Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Best guess for Tkachuk's contract result
8 @ 7M 10 1.61%
8 @ 8M 41 6.59%
8 @ 9M 21 3.38%
8 @ 10M 8 1.29%
7 @ 7M 21 3.38%
7 @ 8M 61 9.81%
7 @ 9M 19 3.05%
7 @ 10M 3 0.48%
6 @ 6M 4 0.64%
6 @ 7M 48 7.72%
6 @ 8M 126 20.26%
6 @ 9M 27 4.34%
5 @ 6M 3 0.48%
5 @ 7M 56 9.00%
5 @ 8M 66 10.61%
5 @ 9M 10 1.61%
4 @ 5M 1 0.16%
4 @ 6M 4 0.64%
4 @ 7M 19 3.05%
3 @ 4M 2 0.32%
3 @ 5M 4 0.64%
3 @ 6M 46 7.40%
2 @ 4M 3 0.48%
2 @ 5M 15 2.41%
1 @ 4M 1 0.16%
1 @ 5M 3 0.48%
Voters: 622. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2019, 08:22 AM   #621
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I think Stone will be one of the better quality blueline pickups for a team come waiver time. He's not useless, and I doubt other teams want to give up any assets for him unless they're trying to dump salary themselves. I see a waiver pickup situation. According to Cap Friendly, there are at least 18 teams right now that could fit his cap hit under their own caps. That's quite a bit.
Ozy_Flame is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 08:29 AM   #622
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
I think Stone will be one of the better quality blueline pickups for a team come waiver time. He's not useless, and I doubt other teams want to give up any assets for him unless they're trying to dump salary themselves. I see a waiver pickup situation. According to Cap Friendly, there are at least 18 teams right now that could fit his cap hit under their own caps. That's quite a bit.
I suppose that he played so little last year that it might take some playing time for teams to have some interest in him. When people say that a player is being "showcased" I don't believe it a lot of the time, but they might have to actually do it with him.

ETA: maybe even preseason games would do it.
GioforPM is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 08:33 AM   #623
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
I think Stone will be one of the better quality blueline pickups for a team come waiver time. He's not useless, and I doubt other teams want to give up any assets for him unless they're trying to dump salary themselves. I see a waiver pickup situation. According to Cap Friendly, there are at least 18 teams right now that could fit his cap hit under their own caps. That's quite a bit.
But a number of those teams still have players to sign.

Calgary would presumably be one of those teams.

If Stone could have been moved for any sort of value, I expect that would have happened already.

There is no way that Treliving will wait until the close of camp and waiver time to figure out Calgary's cap situation.
The Cobra is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 08:39 AM   #624
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
But a number of those teams still have players to sign.

Calgary would presumably be one of those teams.

If Stone could have been moved for any sort of value, I expect that would have happened already.

There is no way that Treliving will wait until the close of camp and waiver time to figure out Calgary's cap situation.
Only way I can see that happening is a buyout, I truly beleive Brad can't trade Stone unless we are taking an anchor contract back - which is probably not what he's looking to do.

Isn't the buyout window coming up for the Flames? If he's not bought out, then it's waiver wire for him - the more likely of the two scenarios.
Ozy_Flame is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 08:46 AM   #625
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Only way I can see that happening is a buyout, I truly beleive Brad can't trade Stone unless we are taking an anchor contract back - which is probably not what he's looking to do.

Isn't the buyout window coming up for the Flames? If he's not bought out, then it's waiver wire for him - the more likely of the two scenarios.
I wonder if trading with 50% retained is an option. Better than a buyout IMO. You keep a $1.75 hit for one year instead of $1.16 for two.

Burying him in the AHL still leave a hit of $2.4 and change, plus it's not something I'd want to do to a vet like him so that's not the way to go, IMO.
GioforPM is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 08:49 AM   #626
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Only way I can see that happening is a buyout, I truly beleive Brad can't trade Stone unless we are taking an anchor contract back - which is probably not what he's looking to do.

Isn't the buyout window coming up for the Flames? If he's not bought out, then it's waiver wire for him - the more likely of the two scenarios.
The Flames do have a short buyout window starting anytime now I believe.

If Treliving doesn't buy out Stone, it's likely because he knows he can move Brodie if he has to for draft picks if required.

It's possible the extra money that got in the Lucic trade could help facilitate a buyout of Stone.
The Cobra is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 08:52 AM   #627
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Buyout window starts tomorrow, runs for 48 hours
Toonage is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 09:07 AM   #628
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
I think Stone will be one of the better quality blueline pickups for a team come waiver time. He's not useless, and I doubt other teams want to give up any assets for him unless they're trying to dump salary themselves. I see a waiver pickup situation. According to Cap Friendly, there are at least 18 teams right now that could fit his cap hit under their own caps. That's quite a bit.
For toughness Prout was playing ahead of Stone. He signed as a UFA for 800k

Fantenberg was ahead of Stone he signed a 1 year deal at $950k.

Of the 18 teams that have 3.5M of cap space how many have RFA's to sign?


Cap friendly shows the Flames with 4.6 M in cap space already with Stone's 3.5 included... so there is no problem keeping him?
ricardodw is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 09:15 AM   #629
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Cap friendly shows the Flames with 4.6 M in cap space already with Stone's 3.5 included... so there is no problem keeping him?
Personally I'd still like to sign Tkachuk, but that's just me...
Superfraggle is offline  
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Superfraggle For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 09:23 AM   #630
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Cap friendly shows the Flames with 4.6 M in cap space already with Stone's 3.5 included... so there is no problem keeping him?
For depth, probably not. If he was 800k instead of 3.5 million you bet. But we need that cap space for Tkachuk.

I just don't see him being bought out or traded, only on waiver wire. And I don't really care if I'm proven wrong lol
Ozy_Flame is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 09:52 AM   #631
kurwamac
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

looks like Tkachuk's on his way out
Quote:

On Tkachuk...

The Flames are very much interested in Brayden Point's deal. There has been almost no movement at all so far.
https://tinyurl.com/y22lejzd
kurwamac is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 09:58 AM   #632
squirtle
Crash and Bang Winger
 
squirtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurwamac View Post
looks like Tkachuk's on his way out
Eklund garbage
squirtle is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 09:59 AM   #633
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

If you post Eklund you should be put in the sin bin. If you believe Eklund, banned.

/s (sort of)
Toonage is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 10:05 AM   #634
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurwamac View Post
looks like Tkachuk's on his way out
Funny considering Friedman recently said he's heard negotiations are progressing nicely.
AC is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 10:16 AM   #635
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

The comment that "Tkachuk is on his way out" didn't come from Eklund, but from the poster.
The Cobra is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 10:20 AM   #636
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirtle View Post
Eklund garbage
He refers to Yzerman as the Tampa GM is he even trying anymore?
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2019, 10:21 AM   #637
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

If the trade for Kadri was for Brodie +, then we wouldn't have moved much salary out on that deal. Has to be another plan to create room in Tre's back pocket. I hope it isn't another buyout. I like Stone for depth. After Frolik's agent antics last year, I have no problem with Frolik being sent for spare parts even.
dustygoon is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 10:34 AM   #638
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
If the trade for Kadri was for Brodie +, then we wouldn't have moved much salary out on that deal. Has to be another plan to create room in Tre's back pocket. I hope it isn't another buyout. I like Stone for depth. After Frolik's agent antics last year, I have no problem with Frolik being sent for spare parts even.
It hard to trade players for picks etc. these days unless the player being traded is very sought after.

Frolik is decent enough, but he's in the downward trend of his career, and moving that much cap without taking much back isn't easy these days.

You can get UFA's for $1M who are a good or better than Stone.

I think Treliving's back pocket deal now is to trade Brodie for picks.
The Cobra is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 10:34 AM   #639
---Hatrick---
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Red Deer
Exp:
Default

The “interest” in the Point contract, is probably speculated based off of interest in what is contract is going to come in at
__________________
It was in.
---Hatrick--- is offline  
Old 07-29-2019, 10:37 AM   #640
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---Hatrick--- View Post
The “interest” in the Point contract, is probably speculated based off of interest in what is contract is going to come in at
Every team is interested in that deal, as it's sets a benchmark for their own negotiations with their own elite RFA's.
The Cobra is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021