Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-13-2017, 09:03 PM   #341
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnie View Post


(but not really)
When this first happened, and was even posted in this thread, it was rumoured that the kid that did it was a Bernie supporter.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 09:09 PM   #342
Minnie
Franchise Player
 
Minnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
When this first happened, and was even posted in this thread, it was rumoured that the kid that did it was a Bernie supporter.
I know. I saw, here and in reports online. Figured it was a smokescreen from idiots. My comment/gif isn't a dig at you, it just means "Oh looky there, shocking but not, that he was a white terrorist thug seen at a hate rally, with other white domestic terrorist thugs."
Minnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 09:17 PM   #343
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

There's now an exemption to Godwin's Law... https://twitter.com/sfmnemonic/statu...84949634232320

Quote:
Mike Godwin‏ @sfmnemonic

By all means, compare these ####heads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 08-13-2017, 09:24 PM   #344
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
@BettyBowers
All patriotic Americans want to know: Why didn't James Alex Fields' Christian family and pastor inform authorities of his radicalization?
https://twitter.com/BettyBowers/stat...55103913730048
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 08-13-2017, 10:03 PM   #345
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I had to take some time out of my day to list all the times I strengthened my argument by unironically quoting Hitler and/or unironically displaying a swastika.

I'm running out of parchment.
__________________
Mom and Dad love you, Rowan - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 10:04 PM   #346
Duruss
Scoring Winger
 
Duruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sundre
Exp:
Default

Gah, the trolls are out in force over this. Stopped by the huffpo and the comments are trash dog whistle about the left, but when you go full on fascist everything is to the left including common sense and decency.
Duruss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 10:24 PM   #347
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

4 years.



I can't even

https://twitter.com/memebrulee2/stat...67113385705472
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 10:28 PM   #348
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

The new uniform.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nguard-america

The man accused of murdering a woman by deliberately driving into her during protests against a far-right rally was photographed earlier in the day standing with the white supremacist, neo-Nazi group Vanguard America.

Photographs from earlier that day appear to show Fields rallying with Vanguard America and carrying a shield bearing the group’s insignia. He wears the white polo shirt and khaki pants that are the group’s uniform.


chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chemgear For This Useful Post:
Old 08-13-2017, 10:37 PM   #349
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/BettyBowers/stat...55103913730048

All patriotic Americans want to know: Why didn't James Alex Fields' Christian family and pastor inform authorities of his radicalization?
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chemgear For This Useful Post:
Old 08-13-2017, 10:41 PM   #350
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
Trump won't condemn the white nationalists because those are his supporters and he doesn't want to alienate them. And it's not just the white nationalists in Charlottesville, it's all over the country. If he condemns them and he's basically condemning his entire voter base.

I mean think about that for second, the president of the United States of America won't condemn Nazis in his own ####ing country because he doesn't want to alienate his supporters.
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 10:57 PM   #351
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear View Post
no one should be remotely surprised by this....

While not all Trump supporters are racists, there are many racists who see Trump's message as one of White Identity Politics and flock to him for that very reason....

I just watched Obama's A More Perfect Union speech again, and am struck by how great an orator he is, but also how much he tried to appeal to white voters that felt they were disenfranchised and didn't try to trivialize those that had those feelings.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2017, 11:01 PM   #352
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

So Trump's defense is likely to be that the local police allowed this to happen under McAuliffe's watch if the usual Breitbart signals are to be believed. He can flip the blame to a Democrat for being soft on crime and try to avoid the negative fallout (not that it will work this time)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...tream-account/

Quote:
“I have a message to all the white supremist [sic] and the Nazis who came into Charlottesville today … You came here today to hurt people and you did hurt people,” McAuliffe told reporters at a press conference Saturday night.

The governor repeatedly emphasized the violence of “nazis” but made no reference to violence by any left-wing group, despite being asked repeatedly about what role such groups may have played in Saturday’s melee. The implication was clear that the violence was an unavoidable result of far-right white identity political groups being allowed to hold a rally.

But a report on police conduct during and after the rally by ProPublica, a left-leaning investigative journalism non-profit, as well as eyewitness accounts by those who participated in the rally itself, have called the simplicity of this characterization into question. Both suggest mismanagement of police resources by political leadership may have exacerbated, rather than controlled, the violence surrounding the rally and the counter-protests, which included mainstream liberals and local faith-based “anti-racism” groups as well as radical leftist “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) and “Anti-Fascist Action” (Antifa) outfits
Quote:
All four also took issue with the idea they or anyone associated with them had been the prime movers in the violence that broke out around the Lee statue. Asked when the Antifa attacks began George told Breitbart News, “Immediately. The very first convoy was already being hit by Antifa. As we got into the entrance, you would have people pushing you.”

“We initiated, from what I saw, literally none of the violence. I would say, of the violence initated 98 percent Antifa, two percent ours, and that’s just out of margin of error,” George said.
Quote:
The media widely reported the rally as a “Ku Klux Klan” or “neo-Nazi” march. None of the Alt-Right activists or other attendees with whom Breitbart News spoke denied that self-identified “KKK members” and “Nazis” including a contingent of the decades-old National Socialist Movement (NSM) were present at the rally. All, however, downplayed their significance and claimed these groups mostly kept to themselves on one side of Emancipation Park. “I was on the side with mostly Alt-Right. The other end was the NSM,” George said.




Wow. Don't believe what you saw people. Or the reporters on the ground. Or the guys that were marching. Or the flags. Or chants. Or 3%ers militia with their guns. These guys were just there to peacefully demonstrate their love for US history

Last edited by Street Pharmacist; 08-13-2017 at 11:07 PM.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 08:25 AM   #353
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Angry white racist photographed at nazi rally shocked and disappointed that he is being viewed as being an angry white racist:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7891791.html
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-14-2017, 09:20 AM   #354
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

This leads to the conversation of how much freedom of speech is too much freedom of speech, how much freedom to protest and assemble is too much freedom to protest and assemble.

We walk the fine line when we see images of angry white supremacists marching with lit torches. Its the old if they're not violent they can do what they want. However what we're seeing is distinct groups protesting each other and confronting each other and like a match being thrown on old newspapers it goes up in flames quickly.

Why give anyone the freedom to march? Why not make rallies illegal unless your going to rally in this abandoned industrial area on Sunday at Midnight that the police have set aside for you.

It just seems to me, that these fringe groups the Nazi's the white supremacists, the Antifa, aren't protesting, they're not practicing their freedom of speech and expression and discontentment. Wait, some in those groups might absolutely be doing that, but these protests by design are made to inflame and get two distinct angry groups in close relation to each other.

Do we need to change the old saying "I might not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it to my dying breath". to "Shut your mouth you can't say that". And then who defines what's out of bounds.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:25 AM   #355
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Well, hate speech isn't and shouldn't be protected and I think more of the argument is they can't drive cars into crowds and murder people. Oh my, truly begs the question of who will watch the watchmen doesn't it?

They're not exactly demonstrating peacefully. How the hell is "Nazis are bad" a hot take now that's somehow considered up for debate?
ResAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ResAlien For This Useful Post:
Old 08-14-2017, 09:30 AM   #356
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
Well, hate speech isn't and shouldn't be protected and I think more of the argument is they can't drive cars into crowds and murder people. Oh my, truly begs the question of who will watch the watchmen doesn't it?

They're not exactly demonstrating peacefully. How the hell is "Nazis are bad" a hot take now that's somehow considered up for debate?
Ok, but what and who defines hate speech? Should the only thing that should be restricted is incitement of violence?

Its not a hot take, Nazi's and Skinheads and the other groups are bad period end of story.

And yeah, I know driving a car into a protest, or brawling during a protest are all criminal actions, that falls outside of any kind of constitutional argument and into the duh argument.

What happens when a government gets to decide what constitutes speech that's not protected by Constitutional rights?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:36 AM   #357
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

One thing I learned yesterday watching the National is that "American History X" was based on a true story. They were interviewing the guy the movie was based on. Crazy.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:37 AM   #358
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Also, that's completely and utterly wrong. Hate speech is protected by the first amendment. Technically it's also protected freedom of expression here under s.2(b), it's just overridden by s.1 of the Charter in certain circumstances. But it's absolutely protected speech in the USA.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:47 AM   #359
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
This leads to the conversation of how much freedom of speech is too much freedom of speech, how much freedom to protest and assemble is too much freedom to protest and assemble.
Don't forget, assembling and protesting while packing guns.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:50 AM   #360
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
This leads to the conversation of how much freedom of speech is too much freedom of speech, how much freedom to protest and assemble is too much freedom to protest and assemble.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on this in National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, when Nazis planned a march through a Chicago neighbourhood full of holocaust survivors. Even Nazi marches and swastikas are protected by the first amendment.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021