01-21-2018, 04:43 PM
|
#161
|
Voted for Kodos
|
"If a defending player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by an attacking player so as to cause the defending player to come into contact with his own goalkeeper, such contact shall be deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule, and if necessary a penalty assessed to the attacking player and if a goal is scored it would be disallowed."
That's the only relevant paragraph, all the paragraphs about an attacking player don't matter. The word "incidental" isn't found here. A defender must be pushed, shoved, or fouled, or else the rule cannot apply. Clearly Tkachuk did not push, shove or foul. Incidental bump yes, but that cannot matter, by the rule as written.
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 05:04 PM
|
#162
|
Self-Retired
|
I still find myself furious over the officiating from yesterday.
The Monahan “penalty” was such a huge pile of BS. Myers moves into the path of Monahan with no intention of playing the puck, for the sole purpose of impeding Monahan.
Connor Hellebuyck, although Hendricks head touched his shoulder, the delay appeared to be more of Hellebuyck losing site of the puck and not tracking it left to right. Hellebuyck was not impeded with or restricted from making the save, he was late in picking up the puck in the scrum and simply didn’t move in time.
The combination of these events as well as the poor skating and the loss was inevitable. If that goal is allowed, the jets are deflated and the Flames win easily.
I’m still fuming from this one
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 06:12 PM
|
#163
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F
https://www.nhl.com/flames/video/fla...698/c-56861103
Go to 1:00 of that clip. It'd obvious that it's the contact from Tkachuk into the back of Hendricks that causes him to contact Hellybuck in the crease, and that contact causes Hellybuck to move to his left.
As for "He would not have been able to get back into position", (a) that's not part of the rule, and (b) Hellybuck just misses the rebound, so your assertion is nowhere near definitive.
|
That was the right call. If it was the other way around the same people would be calling for a no goal.
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 06:54 PM
|
#164
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang
I still find myself furious over the officiating from yesterday.
The Monahan “penalty” was such a huge pile of BS. Myers moves into the path of Monahan with no intention of playing the puck, for the sole purpose of impeding Monahan.
Connor Hellebuyck, although Hendricks head touched his shoulder, the delay appeared to be more of Hellebuyck losing site of the puck and not tracking it left to right. Hellebuyck was not impeded with or restricted from making the save, he was late in picking up the puck in the scrum and simply didn’t move in time.
The combination of these events as well as the poor skating and the loss was inevitable. If that goal is allowed, the jets are deflated and the Flames win easily.
I’m still fuming from this one
|
How about the two non calls against the jets in the 3rd then a weak call going for the flames.
__________________
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 06:58 PM
|
#165
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PegCityFlamesFan
How about the two non calls against the jets in the 3rd then a weak call going for the flames.
|
How about the blatant highstick and roughing delivered to Mangiapane during the game? Or Brouwer getting hooked right before Brodie scored that wasn't getting called?
I thought there were 5 or 6 blatant penalties missed to Winnipeg during the first and second, and then the 3rd they refs tried to make up for it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2018, 09:37 PM
|
#166
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by c.t.ner
I thought it was a pretty entertaining game overall. I'd enjoy a Jets vs. Flames playoff series.
Should have probably had 2 points, but you take the point and move onto the next one. Flames get to sit in second for at least a few hours.
|
I think we were watching different games. The Jets dominated us the whole game and, but for other world goaltending, we would have got clobbered.
I want no part of that team in a 7 game series.
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 09:43 PM
|
#167
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
The Flames didn't have any finish, but if they had, they would have scored 4 or 5. They got the Jets to turn the puck over and created dangerous counter-attacks, caught them on odd-man breaks much more than they were caught, and were by no means the worse team out there. It was pretty even - unless you come here, where the consensus is more than they should have been soundly thrashed.
|
With all due respect, this is pure homerism. We were dominated and Smith saved the game. Out shot and chanced badly. The ice was tilted the whole game.
Good thing we have a Vezina candidate in net
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 09:50 PM
|
#168
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffalufagus
With all due respect, this is pure homerism. We were dominated and Smith saved the game. Out shot and chanced badly. The ice was tilted the whole game.
Good thing we have a Vezina candidate in net
|
High danger scoring chances were 7-6 WPG.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2018, 09:56 PM
|
#169
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
High danger scoring chances were 7-6 WPG.
|
Fair enough. But anyone watching that game objectively had to see we were getting beat all over the ice. It looked like we were short handed the whole
Second period. Jets had all the jump.
Having said that the disallowed goal was complete bs
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 10:00 PM
|
#170
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Streak snapped 2-1 to WPG.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffalufagus
With all due respect, this is pure homerism. We were dominated and Smith saved the game. Out shot and chanced badly. The ice was tilted the whole game.
Good thing we have a Vezina candidate in net
|
With all due respect, this is pure despondency.
The Flames were outshot in the first period, but then actually outshot the Jets through the rest of the game. Chances were more accurately very evenly split between both teams. The ice was only “tilted” if your perspective of this team is significantly prejudiced at the outset to expect poor showings from the Flames.
Good thing for Winnipeg they survived to see a shootout.
Last edited by Textcritic; 01-21-2018 at 10:11 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2018, 10:04 PM
|
#171
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Streak snapped 2-1 to WPG.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffalufagus
Fair enough. But anyone watching that game objectively had to see we were getting beat all over the ice. It looked like we were short handed the whole
Second period. Jets had all the jump...
|
There is no such thing as watching a hockey game “objectively.” Your interpretation of yesterday’s game is good proof of that.
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 10:46 PM
|
#172
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
There is no such thing as watching a hockey game “objectively.” Your interpretation of yesterday’s game is good proof of that.
|
Lol. Okay.
|
|
|
01-21-2018, 10:49 PM
|
#173
|
Franchise Player
|
I thought it was a pretty even game except for that period after the disallowed goal. Winnipeg came out firing on all cyniders and Flames were on their heels.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.
|
|