View Poll Results: Pick the best prospect from the following
|
Agostino
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Andersson
|
  
|
2 |
0.68% |
Arnold
|
  
|
2 |
0.68% |
Billins
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Bruce
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Carroll
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Culkin
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Deblouw
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Elson
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Gilmour
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Granlund
|
  
|
138 |
47.10% |
Grant
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Harrison
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Hathaway
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Kanzig
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Karnaukhov
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Klimchuk
|
  
|
89 |
30.38% |
Kulak
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kylington
|
  
|
44 |
15.02% |
Mangiapane
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
McDonald
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Morrison
|
  
|
3 |
1.02% |
Ollas Mattsson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Rafikov
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Sieloff
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Smith
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Van Brabant
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Wolf
|
  
|
1 |
0.34% |
Wotherspoon
|
  
|
7 |
2.39% |
07-11-2015, 08:55 AM
|
#2
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Voting Klimchuk so I don't have to vote Granlund
__________________
Originally Posted by oilboy2
This deal is DONE, im not sure what the worry is. Heatly is an Oiler, just some paperwork to get done. This isnt another Nylander incident
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Captaincanada80 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:00 AM
|
#3
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
I was torn between Andersson, Granlund, Klimchuk and Kylington ... went Kylington on extreme upside (sorry Granlund people)
Have a feeling I may be stuck voting for Kylington for a few rounds though!
Sure sounds like the Flames came away happy with his performance at summer camp. Big year for him.
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:02 AM
|
#4
|
Scoring Winger
|
Klimchuk as he has a higher ceiling than Granlund.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to badger89 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:05 AM
|
#5
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
My 7th straight vote for olliekdot, The Gunfighter from the OK Corral, the Kylington Express, the Sweet Swede, The Big Chill himself.......Oliver Kylington.
He will be our #1 prospect when we do this list next summer.....
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:12 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
Voted Granlund. Already shown he can be an NHLer and I believe is still getting better.
I don't really get the Kylington votes. So he has upside and I guess he had a good development camp.
Howver, he was drafted end of the second round just a few weeks ago. He has already passed Klimchuk,a first round pick? I understand different draft years can be stronger than others but can't help but think his development camp showing is over rated or Klimchuk's performance since his being drafted is really disappointing for some people.
I haven't seen either play nearly enough to come to this conclusion. Alot of the buzz on Kylington is because many think we got great value drafting him when we did. That may be contributing to him being over valued in this poll.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:13 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
I picked Klimchuck, but having regrets with Kylington and Andersson still there.
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:14 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
|
I'm still staying with Granlund. He's shown he can play at the NHL level and I believe his development will slightly improve his skills while (hopefully) bring more consistency to his game.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilboimcdavid
Eakins wasn't a bad coach, the team just had 2 bad years, they should've been more patient.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:22 AM
|
#9
|
First Line Centre
|
Klimchuk for me, really like what he brings. His upside is similar to Granlund but I think Klimchuk is more likely to reach it
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:24 AM
|
#10
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Howver, he was drafted end of the second round just a few weeks ago. He has already passed Klimchuk,a first round pick? I understand different draft years can be stronger than others but can't help but think his development camp showing is over rated or Klimchuk's performance since his being drafted is really disappointing for some people.
|
Totally hear you.
To me though its where a player tops out. Klimchuk is a given and will get my vote soon. But I think he's likely a third line guy. A good one hopefully, but a third line guy.
Guys taken at the end of the first round are usually in that Klimchuk mold.
Kylington dropped like a stone this year, but was as high as 3/4 in the past draft a year earlier because of his talent. If the Flames get him on track he could be a top pairing defenseman.
The warts of his fall kept him out of my top 7 but this is the point in the prospect rankings where guys start to have issues ... either upside, or attitude, or skating, or size, etc.
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:26 AM
|
#11
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
|
I will continue to beat the Klimchuk drum....
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Incogneto For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:31 AM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
Going with Granlund, though Klimchuk was close. I see them as having similar upside, Klimchuk maybe slightly higher, but Granlund has translated some to the AHL and NHL already.
I'd bet a good chunk of NHL teams would like to have this many prospects with top-half-of-the-roster upside fighting it out for 8th best prospect honors.
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:53 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm excited about Kylington's potential, but I think his valuation as a second rounder is closer to being right than earlier top 5 valuations. I'm eager to see how he progresses over the next 3-4 seasons.
Granlund gets my vote again this round.
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:56 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Kylington, klimchuk, Andersson, or gran Lund.
Went with Kylington
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 09:56 AM
|
#15
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
|
Real toss up between Granlund and Klimchuk, went with Klimchuk because I see him as more likely to make it full time as a solid utility player that can run up and down the lines. A more complete player IMO
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 10:03 AM
|
#16
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
What a time to be a Flames fan.
Would have killed to have such depth 10 years ago.
__________________
Media from: @NHLGIFs, @Sportsnet960, @NHL, @NHLFlames
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 10:10 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Stole this approach from someone earlier - which player would I least like to lose?
So now the answer is Klimchuk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 10:15 AM
|
#18
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Klimchuk
Granlund can ROT IN HELL.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2015, 10:18 AM
|
#19
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Yo I'm voting granlund at number 11, after klimchuk, kylington and andersson
|
|
|
07-11-2015, 10:19 AM
|
#20
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Like many others here on CP, I HATE Granlund! But seriously, hopefully he can put on 10-15 pounds of muscle this summer so he's not quite so weak in the corners.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.
|
|