Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2015, 10:17 AM   #1
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default Flames nation article: PCS winners and losers on draft day

Edit : can't seem to change the title to Flames Nation. Stupid phone.
http://flamesnation.ca/2015/7/3/pcs-...the-2015-draft

Interesting read. I've never heard of pcs before. This article reads that the Flames killed it at the draft. Not shockingly the bruins rated awful at pcs

What's pcs?

Read the article. It's a very long read but fascinating stuff.

Quote:
The Flames nailed day two of the draft, grabbing CanucksArmy favorites Rasmus Andersson, Oliver Kylington, and Andrew Mangiapane much later than they were expected to be available. Combining a solid draft with the addition of Dougie Hamilton makes for an outstanding weekend for the Flames. The Pacific division got a lot scarier this weekend.

Last edited by White Out 403; 07-04-2015 at 10:23 AM.
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to White Out 403 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2015, 10:30 AM   #2
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I love guys that run data around, but in this case, the "winner" would be the team that took the guy falling the most every single round, and I've seen in other studies that the opposite is true;

that is, teams that have conviction do better than teams that take the falling stars every round.

I love the Kylington pick, but I won't deny the risk in taking a guy that has fallen that far. Rico Fata was a similar story in 1998. Sometimes there is a big reason not to select a player at any point.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2015, 10:49 AM   #3
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I love guys that run data around, but in this case, the "winner" would be the team that took the guy falling the most every single round, and I've seen in other studies that the opposite is true;

that is, teams that have conviction do better than teams that take the falling stars every round.

I love the Kylington pick, but I won't deny the risk in taking a guy that has fallen that far. Rico Fata was a similar story in 1998. Sometimes there is a big reason not to select a player at any point.
Not all guys are fallers though they are using the criteria PSC/%/Overall etc. If a team took them earlier then their ranking then they're a loser. If a team took them after then they're a winner.

A guy like Maniapane was rated higher with this system but we took him later.

Interesting study. Would like to read more on it.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 10:52 AM   #4
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I love the Kylington pick, but I won't deny the risk in taking a guy that has fallen that far. Rico Fata was a similar story in 1998. Sometimes there is a big reason not to select a player at any point.
I don't know why anyone would ever think Rico Fata was a bad pick, he wasn't a risk, he was a pure reward <3
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 11:52 AM   #5
Pliddy
Backup Goalie
 
Pliddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern Alberta
Exp:
Default

The Flames from the era were VERY rewarding, although no one Fata'd like Rico
__________________
"You just got your asses whipped by a bunch of gawddamned nerds" - Coach Harris
Pliddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 11:54 AM   #6
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

They need to weight for overall quality of pick, too. It's funny that the Bruins are ranked 28th or whatever after moving a bunch of players for picks, but let's not pretend that the Flames' prospect pool is more improved than a team that selected 13th, 14th, and 15th, even if those picks were slight reaches at the time.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 01:59 PM   #7
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Interesting that Kylington's PCS delta is exactly zero: that is, their model says the Flames took him exactly when he should have been drafted. He isn't rated any higher on account of falling.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 04:22 PM   #8
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

For those that don't want to dig through the endless junkpile of articles at Canucks Army, here's the ones that matter:

Andersson
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/6/19/nat...1-acea79dd61f7

Kylington
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/6/23/nat...iver-kylington

Both
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/1/28/the...a-man-s-league

and hearing we stole some favorites out from under nucks fans and in depth bloggers makes this day feel even better.
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2015, 05:27 PM   #9
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
For those that don't want to dig through the endless junkpile of articles at Canucks Army, here's the ones that matter:

Andersson
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/6/19/nat...1-acea79dd61f7

Kylington
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/6/23/nat...iver-kylington

Both
http://canucksarmy.com/2015/1/28/the...a-man-s-league

and hearing we stole some favorites out from under nucks fans and in depth bloggers makes this day feel even better.
Thanks for posting these links. The are, indeed, very worthwhile reads.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021