[OOT] January 17 with seven games.

[hwy19man]

The Thursday OOT has a big intra Central Division game along with other key western conference teams in action.
http://sportsstats.cbc.ca/news/NHL-P...ate=01-17-2019
https://scores.nbcsports.com/nhl/sco...p?day=20190117




1700h

at on but not the Ontario channel and on SN360

http://sportsstats.cbc.ca/hockey/nhl...summary_6.html
______________________________________

1800h




at on

http://sportsstats.cbc.ca/hockey/nhl-matchups.aspx?page=/data/NHL/matchups/g2_summary_8.htm

______________________________________





1700h Devils at Islanders
1730h Leafs at Lightning---also on on TVA Sports in french

1800h
Ducks at Wild
Jets at Predators

1830h Kings at Stars

[DoubleK]

Ugh. Why isn't Tampa/Toronto national.

[MrMike]

Originally Posted by DoubleK

Ugh. Why isn't Tampa/Toronto national.

Because of the toilet battle between the Rangers and Chicago?

[hwy19man]

The Original Six game is for viewers in the United States. The Blues-Bruins game is for viewers in Canada because they want to remember the 1970 Stanley cup finals. Bobby Orr's famous goal.

The Lightning game is national if you want to hear it in French and if your cable company offers it. Shaw does not!

[GullFoss]

I know its far fetched and fanciful, but I would love Toronto to go on a bit of a slide. It would be great if the team picked by the pundits to be favorites for the cup ended up missing the playoffs or got swept by tampa in the first round.

[Toonage]

Minnesota. Just the worst.

[White Out 403]

Jets goal taken off the board because it was an inch off side that had nothing to do with the goal itself.

Such a stupid system for replay on offside.

[hwy19man]

The Blues and Bruins are tied 2-2 after forty minutes.

The Islanders jumped out to a 3-0 lead and have maintained it.

[thefoss1957]

'Hawks with 2 PPG, but bad defensive turnovers have them down 3-2 midway through the 3rd

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T377A using Tapatalk

[timbit]

Originally Posted by White Out 403

Jets goal taken off the board because it was an inch off side that had nothing to do with the goal itself.

Such a stupid system for replay on offside.

So it was offside and they got it right after review?

It had loads to do with the goal.

How, in any way , do you classify the system as stupid?

[FiveSeven]

There should be a time limit or SOMETHING to make the offside review better.
Oh you're half an inch offside on a play that spent 30 seconds in the zone? No goal!
Personally I think they should just remove the offside review and let the refs do their jobs, or at least, modify it in some manner.

[getbak]

Nevermind, my original comment didn't make sense.

[getbak]

Nevermind.

[hwy19man]

The Kings have a 2-0 lead midway through the second period. Campbell is in net and has had to make only nine saves so far.

[hwy19man]

The Ducks look to end their slump as they lead 3-0 and Gibson looking for the shutout.

[White Out 403]

Originally Posted by timbit

So it was offside and they got it right after review?

It had loads to do with the goal.

How, in any way , do you classify the system as stupid?

The replay review rule was brought in to correct obvious mistakes. The game had an 8 to 10 minute delay while they went frame by frame to see if it's skate was an inch or two off side. If they can't determine the play as being offside within the first minute then it's too close to matter and call on ice should stand.

[TheSutterDynasty]

Originally Posted by White Out 403

The replay review rule was brought in to correct obvious mistakes. The game had an 8 to 10 minute delay while they went frame by frame to see if it's skate was an inch or two off side. If they can't determine the play as being offside within the first minute then it's too close to matter and call on ice should stand.

And one inch is absolutely no advantage either way.

The whole point of the review is to take away unfair advantages that were missed by refs. We've strayed so far away from that now.

[dash_pinched]

nm

[browna]

Originally Posted by TheSutterDynasty

And one inch is absolutely no advantage either way.

The whole point of the review is to take away unfair advantages that were missed by refs. We've strayed so far away from that now.

So the puck one inch over the line on a goal, is no big deal if missed?

A rule is a rule and if you're going make the decision to allow the review of specific said rules, it needs to be reviewed to get the correct and absolute answer, even if its half an inch offside.

[theinfinitejar]

Originally Posted by browna

So the puck one inch over the line on a goal, is no big deal if missed?

A rule is a rule and if you're going make the decision to allow the review of specific said rules, it needs to be reviewed to get the correct and absolute answer, even if its half an inch offside.

Yes, we need to review every call as soon as they happen. Dump in from an inch behind the red line? No Goal! The most important thing in sports is that the rules are followed exactly to the letter each and every time.


Scrap the stupid thing.