Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-13-2019, 04:14 AM   #21
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Brodie for saad.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 06:43 AM   #22
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

No to 6 year contract. Truthfully i don't feel comfortable at 5 years. I would trade Brodie and wait on an extension for Hamonic. See how the youngsters are doing during season and maybe trade him for forward help at deadline. I would also be all right with them letting him walk as a F/A. I rather he walks than be stuck with a 5/6 year contract for $5 + million per.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 06:44 AM   #23
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Not shocked that this is the scenario. I figured they could keep one of Brodie or Hamonic but not both. Hamonic makes way more sense to keep. I would prefer a 3-4 year deal around $5M per.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:20 AM   #24
flamesforcup
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesforcup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Exp:
Default

6.5*6 is a good deal for both sides i feel.
flamesforcup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:32 AM   #25
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I imagine there is some framework in place for a Brodie trade at the draft.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 07:35 AM   #26
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesforcup View Post
6.5*6 is a good deal for both sides i feel.

Rather they let him walk in a years time than hand out that contract. The league is getting younger, and 1st tier RFA's are getting paid after their entry deal. It's not going to be to long before the 2nd tier rfa's get paid also. The 29/30 year old" get paid free agency" is not going to be along much longer, especially for 2nd tier players. Lets get ahead of the curve instead of behind it, when it comes to older FA's.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 07:44 AM   #27
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Good time to see what his demands are. Try and work out a deal, if one can't be reached, trade him this summer while his value is at it's peak.

Hopefully a deal can be reached somewhere around 4 years. Takes him to approx 33 years old.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 07:44 AM   #28
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesforcup View Post
6.5*6 is a good deal for both sides i feel.
That worries me a ton. I'm afraid by year 3 he may turn into an Andrew MacDonald and we will be saddled with a large unmovable contract.

I hope for 4.85 @ 4 years with a full NMC or somewhere in that area.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:47 AM   #29
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
That worries me a ton. I'm afraid by year 3 he may turn into an Andrew MacDonald and we will be saddled with a large unmovable contract.

I hope for 4.85 @ 4 years with a full NMC or somewhere in that area.
The Flames don't give full NMC
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:50 AM   #30
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The Flames don't give full NMC
I did not know that. Well some form of protection for him to get a hometown discount.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:58 AM   #31
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

In a league where parity is normal and rare to have teams now totally top heavy, I feel the Flames have depth to compete. Where they need to change it up is to get rid of guys who aren't well conditioned, for guys at the very least who are average or better skaters. That's your starting point. So I'd dangle Neal, Monahan and Brodie as the three to change up. Perhaps Frolik can be dealt with a rookie to get a bigger guy as well. Lastly, I'd deal the 1st rounder with any of the above to get a solid top line upgrade. The rest for the most part I'd keep. You just have to have a variety of talents on the team, but the league is quickly moving to a mobile league as your starting point - speed is on trend, and if all 4 lines have it, it wears down other teams.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:58 AM   #32
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

In his prime, reasonable contract, wants to be here, on a relatively soft team he stuck up for a team mate (probably went up a weight class), played through a broken jaw. It would be a shame to trade a guy like that so I hope this rumour is true.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 07:59 AM   #33
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I think people are going to be quite pleasantly surprised at Hamonic's contract. His comparables are quite varied - he doesn't have offensive stats to throw at Treliving, he wants to be here and he seems like a guy not prone to big demands. He likely gets some sort of limited NMC to protect him from expansion.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 08:02 AM   #34
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

4 x $4.75M? Too little?
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 08:04 AM   #35
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Hamonic is the guy you want on your team...captain material.
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 08:04 AM   #36
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
4 x $4.75M? Too little?
I think that's right in the ballpark.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 08:22 AM   #37
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I imagine there is some framework in place for a Brodie trade at the draft.
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2019, 08:27 AM   #38
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
Hamonic is the guy you want on your team...captain material.
Strongly agree...just dont think his body will age well. I would be very hesitant about anything over 4 years.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 08:57 AM   #39
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

I would offer hamonic the same term and dollars as his last deal with a NMC.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2019, 09:02 AM   #40
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure I'd be willing to give him a NMC nor do I think the Flames would be.

Hanifin and Valimaki should be locks for protection spots. A NMC for Hamonic would mean that both Andersson and Kylington are unprotected (along with an old Giordano).
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021