Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-18-2020, 02:57 PM   #161
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo View Post
Not specifically about Mangiapane and apologies if this has been discussed but do we know what happens to contracts if the NHL has to continue when the next season starts (January?) with no (or limited) crowds.

I assume most contracts are based on teams having revenues of ~40 games with ~20,000 fans paying ~$100 per ticket. If that revenue (plus all ancillary revenue from concessions to parking to game day merchandise sales) is gone, how to teams honour their contracts with players which are all staying (roughly) where'd you'd expect them to be B.C. (Before Covid).
Escrow has been set @ 20% in anticipation of much lower revenues, and in the event that players take home +50% of HRR, this will be corrected gradually over subsequent years when revenues reestablish until the owners are made whole.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2020, 10:24 PM   #162
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

There is zero doubt that players will be taking home in excess of 50% of HRR this year. IMO it’s a question of how many years of 20% escrow and a flat cap before it balances out.

If the season is shortened, you’d think there would be some discussion of prorating salaries. A 40 game season with arenas at say 20% capacity would be maybe a 75% hit to HRR? You could probably ball park this knowing the TV money.

If owners are paying out salaries at 80% of pre covid levels, will a team in the league be cash flow positive? Probably not even close. Presumably some owners wouldn’t want to play under that scenario.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2020, 08:51 AM   #163
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

By the numbers: Grading every NHL team’s contract efficiency, 2020 edition

By By Dom Luszczyszyn Nov 6, 2020 has Maniapane's contract as the very best value contract for the Flames.

Quote:
He looks like a legitimate top-six player and that’s a steal at his price point.
Team friendly agent working for Mangiapane?

The Flames rank 10th in the league in overall value contracts up from 12th in 2019.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2020, 09:05 AM   #164
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
By the numbers: Grading every NHL team’s contract efficiency, 2020 edition

By By Dom Luszczyszyn Nov 6, 2020 has Maniapane's contract as the very best value contract for the Flames.



Team friendly agent working for Mangiapane?

The Flames rank 10th in the league in overall value contracts up from 12th in 2019.
Why do you look for things that just don't exist?

The Flames and Managiapane couldn't fit a longer term contract into the cap, so they went shorter term. That puts the risk on both sides, but given his trajectory more on the team since two more good seasons means a bigger contract.

No conspiracy theory here.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2020, 09:30 AM   #165
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Why do you look for things that just don't exist?

The Flames and Managiapane couldn't fit a longer term contract into the cap, so they went shorter term. That puts the risk on both sides, but given his trajectory more on the team since two more good seasons means a bigger contract.

No conspiracy theory here.
Whatever the motivation it turns out to be a fantastic contract for the Flames.

Flames 2 Managiapane 0
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2020, 09:39 AM   #166
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Whatever the motivation it turns out to be a fantastic contract for the Flames.

Flames 2 Managiapane 0
Any time you go shorter term on a deal with a young player it has the potential to be a huge win for the player.

Both sides understand this.

Not only is there no fire here ... there's no smoke.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2020, 10:51 AM   #167
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Any time you go shorter term on a deal with a young player it has the potential to be a huge win for the player.

Both sides understand this.

Not only is there no fire here ... there's no smoke.
Right - that analysis seems to ignore the next step on a lot of these contracts. Which is the next contract.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021