Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Best guess for Tkachuk's contract result
8 @ 7M 10 1.61%
8 @ 8M 41 6.59%
8 @ 9M 21 3.38%
8 @ 10M 8 1.29%
7 @ 7M 21 3.38%
7 @ 8M 61 9.81%
7 @ 9M 19 3.05%
7 @ 10M 3 0.48%
6 @ 6M 4 0.64%
6 @ 7M 48 7.72%
6 @ 8M 126 20.26%
6 @ 9M 27 4.34%
5 @ 6M 3 0.48%
5 @ 7M 56 9.00%
5 @ 8M 66 10.61%
5 @ 9M 10 1.61%
4 @ 5M 1 0.16%
4 @ 6M 4 0.64%
4 @ 7M 19 3.05%
3 @ 4M 2 0.32%
3 @ 5M 4 0.64%
3 @ 6M 46 7.40%
2 @ 4M 3 0.48%
2 @ 5M 15 2.41%
1 @ 4M 1 0.16%
1 @ 5M 3 0.48%
Voters: 622. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2019, 08:11 AM   #1341
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I think Treliving may be holding for another comparable RFA to go.
If you use Marner and Aho as comparable players, a simplistic analysis using PPG would put Tkachuk at around 9M on 6 years based off Marner and 8M on 5b years based on Aho.
No forward in that tier has signed a bridge, no one has maxed term. If we get another signing at 5 or 6 years, that may help land a deal of that term. Get a couple of full term or bridge deals, those become easier.
A 3 year bridge with a bigger amount to qualify, kind of like the McAvoy deal, would be interesting, to allow the team to compete while Gio and Gaudreau are under contract, then recalibrate the salary structure.

If the contract is long term, and putting the flames over the cap, I wouldn't be surprised to see a deal sending Frolik to Columbus with a pick. They are short picks and NHL proven forwards, and have cap space to burn
Imported_Aussie is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:31 AM   #1342
Two Fivenagame
First Line Centre
 
Two Fivenagame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MOD EDIT: NO
Exp:
Default

Sorry if this had already been asked/covered -

Is there a possible LTIR move that BT could leverage for cap relief?

For example: could the flames acquire (via trade) a player that will be put on LTIR?
__________________
MOD EDIT: NO!!!
Two Fivenagame is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:41 AM   #1343
SniperJ
Backup Goalie
 
SniperJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

he sure didn't help Phoenix's financial struggle
__________________
SniperJ is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:45 AM   #1344
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dube View Post
It’s actually called a hot take
Nope. That’s a bold prediction. Hot takes are contrary opinions about present or past events. Eg: James Neal was not given enough ice time (not a real opinion of mine but just an example).
GioforPM is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 09:17 AM   #1345
Vansmack
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Nope. That’s a bold prediction. Hot takes are contrary opinions about present or past events. Eg: James Neal was not given enough ice time (not a real opinion of mine but just an example).
I think the joke was about the "hot takes" thread, which contained mostly "bold predictions" which was the more appropriately named thread.
Vansmack is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vansmack For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 09:37 AM   #1346
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperJ View Post
he sure didn't help Phoenix's financial struggle
Not his job to do so either.
__________________
transplant99 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 09:53 AM   #1347
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Two Fivenagame View Post
Sorry if this had already been asked/covered -

Is there a possible LTIR move that BT could leverage for cap relief?

For example: could the flames acquire (via trade) a player that will be put on LTIR?
Well they could, but why would they do that? How does it help them?

It keeps them at the cap ceiling and gives them aero room for a deadline deal.
The Cobra is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 12:03 PM   #1348
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Two Fivenagame View Post
Sorry if this had already been asked/covered -

Is there a possible LTIR move that BT could leverage for cap relief?

For example: could the flames acquire (via trade) a player that will be put on LTIR?
Adding a contract so that we can get relief for the same amount doesn’t help cap wise - its going to be net zero.

However, if you traded some cap hit away for a LTIR contract, it could help.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 12:24 PM   #1349
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

Anyone know what the hold up is or how far apart they are? Starting to get pretty pissed. Missing training camp is unacceptable
btimbit is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 12:31 PM   #1350
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Anyone know what the hold up is or how far apart they are? Starting to get pretty pissed. Missing training camp is unacceptable
I think that its pretty well expected that he will wait all the way until the day before game one. Anything earlier would come as a surprise. Its the cost of business when trying to get the best deal possible for the team.

Last edited by TheIronMaiden; 09-16-2019 at 12:34 PM.
TheIronMaiden is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 12:42 PM   #1351
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Anyone know what the hold up is or how far apart they are? Starting to get pretty pissed. Missing training camp is unacceptable
Well, this was offered by a site member before the weekend:
Quote:
Originally Posted by the-rasta-masta View Post
I've been told from a good source that the Flames offered $7.75 and Tkachuk's camp wants $9.5. No mention of what the term is.
And then this was reported by Friedman:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Friedman on 960 says that he is hearing Flames and Tkachuk are now talking about term (contract length) that they were not discussing before.
Followed by this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by united View Post
On the most recent episode of 31 Thoughts: The Pocast, Elliotte Friedman indicates that the Flames have already told Tkachuk they acknowledge he will become their highest-paid player, the question is how much higher than Gio/Gaudreau.
I think the lack of much useful information on how the negotiation is progressing is likely a product of how closely Treliving tends to play his cards to his vest.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 01:14 PM   #1352
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

3 years 6.75 with a big QO or 6 years 8.35
bax is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:15 PM   #1353
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

At this point I let him sit until he comes down.

He is the one that will lose out on money sitting part/all of the season. Then we can do it all again next year... I also feel like the flames could potentially stay above water in the conference during his absence, which in my mind cuts some of the urgency on our end. If he really wants to be petulant about it let him toil in the swiss leagues.
Monahammer is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 01:20 PM   #1354
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
At this point I let him sit until he comes down.

He is the one that will lose out on money sitting part/all of the season. Then we can do it all again next year... I also feel like the flames could potentially stay above water in the conference during his absence, which in my mind cuts some of the urgency on our end.
.
I doubt the Flames will take that position, they will want this to be sorted out before the seasons starts.

If for what ever reason the signing does not occur by the December 1 deadline,

This creates a glaring hole within the lineup that would have to be addressed IMO

I personally would avoid, listening to the speculation on what was offered etc.... I would bet its all false.
flambers is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:24 PM   #1355
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

So for forwards you've now had Marner sign 6 years at $10.9M, and Konecny sign at 6 years at $5.5M.

Marner: 241 GP, 224 PTS (94 points last season)

Konecny: 233 GP, 124 PTS (49 points last season)

Tkachuk falls directly in the middle of those two from a points perspective. Marner has 50 more points over his career, (+17 last season), Konecny has 50 fewer (-27 last season)

Tkachuk: 224 GP, 174 PTS (77 points last season)

Assuming that Tkachuk falls right in the middle of those two contracts on a 6 year deal that would put him at $8.2M for 6 years. Tkachuk is a year younger than both, and had a better contract year than Konecny, so you are probably looking at a bit of a premium there, so say $8.5M for 6 years.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 09-16-2019 at 01:28 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:26 PM   #1356
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

6 years, 7.2 million:

Year Salary
1 6
2 6.5
3 6.5
4 7
5 8
6 9.2

Highest paid flame by AAV, but keeps out of the highest yearly salary until some of his comrades have chances to negotiate again. Also keeps him respectful of the captain.
Scales up rapidly as he approaches his UFA years. His QO above 9 million also ensures that's the starting point AAV for next contract.

Plus this allows the flames to work cap wise if we put czarnik in the minors. It would also allow a trade of something like Frolik+Czarnik + 1st for Toffoli (I might get laughed away for this one but I don't mind it as the basis.)
Monahammer is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:28 PM   #1357
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

6 @ $8.19 million

You heard it here first.
Manhattanboy is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:40 PM   #1358
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
6 years, 7.2 million:

Year Salary
1 6
2 6.5
3 6.5
4 7
5 8
6 9.2

Highest paid flame by AAV, but keeps out of the highest yearly salary until some of his comrades have chances to negotiate again. Also keeps him respectful of the captain.
Scales up rapidly as he approaches his UFA years. His QO above 9 million also ensures that's the starting point AAV for next contract.

Plus this allows the flames to work cap wise if we put czarnik in the minors. It would also allow a trade of something like Frolik+Czarnik + 1st for Toffoli (I might get laughed away for this one but I don't mind it as the basis.)
He would be UFA so the last year bump is meaningless. I think you would be paying more in AAV on a 6 year deal easily.
Weitz is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:47 PM   #1359
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

I think they settle at 6x9MM

And I really hope this gets wrapped up like yesterday. Missing camp is not good for anyone.
CroFlames is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 01:50 PM   #1360
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I think they settle at 6x9MM

And I really hope this gets wrapped up like yesterday. Missing camp is not good for anyone.
I will be stunned of the cap number begins with 9.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021