11-16-2022, 09:01 AM
|
#61
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
How would we handle the entry draft when two more teams are added back into the league?
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 09:14 AM
|
#62
|
|
something else haha
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
How would we handle the entry draft when two more teams are added back into the league?
|
I would imagine we do how the NHL does it. Which I am a little fuzzy on how it works but didn't Seattle get the 3rd best odds in the lottery or something?
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 09:30 AM
|
#63
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
CPHL has done expansion in the past (years ago), challenge is its allot of work for the GM
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 10:01 AM
|
#64
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
I struggle to find arguments for expansion that would really benefit the league. Yeah, I get it's fun and stuff, but I do fear it might dilute the overall balance. Does expansion close or widen the gap between asset-rich and poor teams?
|
Last time it widened it.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 10:11 AM
|
#65
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
I kindly request that if an expansion happens that my team can relocate from this ####hole and move to my family’s second home of Winnipeg and Edmonton can be one of the expansion teams
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to savardandjokinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 10:35 AM
|
#66
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm all for contracting Edmonton, if only for the delicious passive aggressiveness of it.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 10:53 AM
|
#67
|
|
something else haha
|
Totally agree, relegate the Oilers to the AHL
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Swayze11 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:02 AM
|
#68
|
|
First Line Centre
|
I'm all for expansion if we are confident that it won't create too much turnover in GM's. I have been in this league for 6 months and we've had a couple GM's quit. I'm not sure what the turnover was like before but if we think we can keep 30 or 32 active GM's I'm all for it.
My vote would be 2 teams next summer, see how it goes and potentially do another expansion in a few years? 4 teams at once might be a bit much.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:04 AM
|
#69
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
CPHL has done expansion in the past (years ago), challenge is its allot of work for the GM
|
How? It adds an additional element, but that's no different than if you were an actual GM.. And we only spend minutes a day on this forum, some less.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:06 AM
|
#70
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Last time it widened it.
|
The difference is checks and balances. You didn't have the vast majority of checks in place then, as you do now. Have faith in your own rules.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:14 AM
|
#71
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
The difference is checks and balances. You didn't have the vast majority of checks in place then, as you do now. Have faith in your own rules.
|
The rules help but my belief is that major factor is the relationship between the number of NHL assets and CPHL assets. If you have more of the former, it helps asset distribution in the latter.
It impacts all the ways that teams acquire players: the draft (our draft has less picks than rounds than the NHL, so there are more better prospects to go around), prospect signings, trades, and free agency,
You dilute all of that. And that will be the most material thing that harms asset distribution. Checks and balances won't be sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:31 AM
|
#72
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sec 224 Row 12
|
I'm a new GM, so my opinion is not as informed as others, but I am somewhat opposed to expansion as I believe it will dilute the asset pool. That said: I am enjoying the discussion here and am open to hearing more opinions (with my final vote still up for grabs).
I would love to see Boston & Winnipeg in the CPHL; relocate Arizona already! Back to Winnipeg, haha! CLB or Florida maybe as well?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rumy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:35 AM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
|
If we want Winnipeg and Boston back in I'm pretty sure we can find a path. Would require a combination of a little bit of work for me in the sim (easy) plus some unknown work from Jon and Cam on the site. But I suspect doable b/c we are just changing the name.
I like Arizona to Winnipeg
And then ?? to Boston (CBJ or Nashville)
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:40 AM
|
#75
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Newfoundland
|
Nashville to Boston ��
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 11:57 AM
|
#76
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
I'm all for relocating one or two teams, if possible. Not having the Bruins in the league does feel a bit weird, and bringing back the Jets makes sense too.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 12:10 PM
|
#77
|
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
I would happily move out of Ottawa to do the Bruins... run that organization right into the ####ing ground and feel the greatest sense of schadenfreud I've ever felt.
__________________
THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 12:20 PM
|
#79
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Orrr it can go to a hardcore Bruins fan?!? I only see one of those.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2022, 12:25 PM
|
#80
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Or we can just leave it retired lol
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 AM.
|
|
