Originally posted by Reaper@Apr 2 2005, 06:06 AM Question 1:
How motivated do the other kids remain when I stomp through the chest of the first kid to go down like I'm smashing a pack of ketchup?
Question 2:
How many kids remain from the group after I smear the guts from the first smashed kid on my face before commencing to twist the other kids' heads off like they were bottle caps?
Question 3:
Am I allowed to use the skulls of any expired kids as bludgeoning weapons and do I have an empty pillow case to put a few heads in for said purpose?
That is the single most sadistic, unbelievably brutal, and downright funniest post I've read in a while. Nice one!
Originally posted by InCoGnEtO@Apr 1 2005, 11:36 PM I think you guys are a bunch of wussies! Bring on them little brats! I could take down a good 40 before I would be overwhelmed.
I call BS. I am trained in unarmed tactical takedowns, pressure points and unarmed self defense, I can hardly believe that I would be able to take down more than 4 of these kids without causing them serious injuries under the conditions you've described if they all come pile on me at once...given their reverse height advantage. (I'm 6'0, they're 4'5 at best). 40? are you nuts? maybe 40 hampsters.
Originally posted by Incinerator+Apr 4 2005, 10:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Incinerator @ Apr 4 2005, 10:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-InCoGnEtO@Apr 1 2005, 11:36 PM I think you guys are a bunch of wussies! Bring on them little brats! I could take down a good 40 before I would be overwhelmed.
I call BS. I am trained in unarmed tactical takedowns, pressure points and unarmed self defense, I can hardly believe that I would be able to take down more than 4 of these kids without causing them serious injuries under the conditions you've described if they all come pile on me at once...given their reverse height advantage. (I'm 6'0, they're 4'5 at best). 40? are you nuts? maybe 40 hampsters. [/b][/quote]
whoah...who said anything about not causing serious injuries?
Originally posted by Incinerator@Apr 4 2005, 10:37 PM <!--QuoteBegin-InCoGnEtO
Quote:
@Apr 1 2005, 11:36 PM I think you guys are a bunch of wussies!# Bring on them little brats!# I could take down a good 40 before I would be overwhelmed.
I call BS. I am trained in unarmed tactical takedowns, pressure points and unarmed self defense, I can hardly believe that I would be able to take down more than 4 of these kids without causing them serious injuries under the conditions you've described if they all come pile on me at once...given their reverse height advantage. (I'm 6'0, they're 4'5 at best). 40? are you nuts? maybe 40 hampsters.
whoah...who said anything about not causing serious injuries? [/b][/quote]
well...it's just assumed, they're 5 year old kids for crying out loud...maybe it's just my conscience talking :P
Originally posted by Superfraggle@Apr 5 2005, 04:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Incinerator@Apr 4 2005, 10:37 PM <!--QuoteBegin-InCoGnEtO
Quote:
Quote:
@Apr 1 2005, 11:36 PM I think you guys are a bunch of wussies! Bring on them little brats! I could take down a good 40 before I would be overwhelmed.
I call BS. I am trained in unarmed tactical takedowns, pressure points and unarmed self defense, I can hardly believe that I would be able to take down more than 4 of these kids without causing them serious injuries under the conditions you've described if they all come pile on me at once...given their reverse height advantage. (I'm 6'0, they're 4'5 at best). 40? are you nuts? maybe 40 hampsters.
whoah...who said anything about not causing serious injuries?
well...it's just assumed, they're 5 year old kids for crying out loud...maybe it's just my conscience talking :P [/b][/quote]
Are you nuts???!!!
Midgets are wee however they would be much more intelligent and organized.
I say I'd max out at 4. I'm not that tall to begin with and 4 midgets would probably be organized enough to get me on the ground and then start taking it to me.
This thread will likely upset "The Little People of America".
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Hmmm, interesting. But kids have a lot more reach than midgets do.
I'm thinking about 5-10. Sure the midgets can't swing like the kids can, but they are a lot smarter, and I'll bet they can take a punch a lot better too.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Originally posted by Superfraggle@Apr 5 2005, 04:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Incinerator@Apr 4 2005, 10:37 PM <!--QuoteBegin-InCoGnEtO
Quote:
Quote:
@Apr 1 2005, 11:36 PM I think you guys are a bunch of wussies!# Bring on them little brats!# I could take down a good 40 before I would be overwhelmed.
I call BS. I am trained in unarmed tactical takedowns, pressure points and unarmed self defense, I can hardly believe that I would be able to take down more than 4 of these kids without causing them serious injuries under the conditions you've described if they all come pile on me at once...given their reverse height advantage. (I'm 6'0, they're 4'5 at best). 40? are you nuts? maybe 40 hampsters.
whoah...who said anything about not causing serious injuries?
well...it's just assumed, they're 5 year old kids for crying out loud...maybe it's just my conscience talking :P [/b][/quote]
If a group of insane 5 year olds are trying to take me out then I wouldn't care if they got hurt or not. More than likely, I'd be making business for tiny casket makers.
Originally posted by JiriHrdina@Apr 5 2005, 10:29 AM OK. Let's change it up a bit.
How many midgets could you take down?
Midgets are wee however they would be much more intelligent and organized.
I say I'd max out at 4. I'm not that tall to begin with and 4 midgets would probably be organized enough to get me on the ground and then start taking it to me.
This thread will likely upset "The Little People of America".
How much room is there in the fighting area? If I have room to move I know I have enough time to run around and get set up to kick the heads off quite a few midgets. I'm 6'3" with a good vertical so I'm going to go with 10 midgets before I got too tired to avoid resorting to a weapon for defense.
This is the most ridiculous, hilarious thread ever.
Here is my take on it:
If you decided to take on 10-15 of them you could likely pull it off. This would give you enough space and time to give them all a shot and KO them. I don't think they could swarm fast enough.
However, if you got cocky and thought you could take on 30+ then I think you would be in trouble early. With that many of them swarming you all at once you wouldn't be able to move well enough. They would be all over your legs not allowing you to get any power in your kicks. Also I think 5 or 6 of them would be trained to just grab your legs and hold on for dear life. A few kids on each leg and you would topple over in no time and that would be the beginning of the end.
According to AC's link, I would say the average weight is around 35 lbs per kid. So anyone who says they could take more than 30 of these ankle biting mofos (over 1000 lbs) is OUT TO LUNCH. You can only run for so long, before a swarm of 6-8 jump on you and take you down, and pile on Matrix style eventually causing suffocation.
A lot hinges on teamwork though......if they had a clear leader calling the shots and adjusting barking commands to his forces, you might have a chance if he got taken out first with a low throat punch or simple soccer kick to the kidneys. With the ground forces left in disarray, guerilla hit and run style warfare might get you through 25-30 of the bastids.
Having wrestled with a 6 year old and a 3 year old at the same time (while trying not to squish the baby - who likes to be a part of everything) it doesn't take much to knock em down. And they don't hit very hard. The number would be pretty high even if they swarmed. If they came one at a time video game style the only opponent would be boredom
Midgets, on the other hand, would probably only need 2 to take me down. How the hell do fight against someone with such a low center of gravity. Your only hope would be to bop 'em on the head Little Bunny Fu-Fu style.
Having wrestled with a 6 year old and a 3 year old at the same time (while trying not to squish the baby - who likes to be a part of everything) it doesn't take much to knock em down. And they don't hit very hard. The number would be pretty high even if they swarmed. If they came one at a time video game style the only opponent would be boredom
Midgets, on the other hand, would probably only need 2 to take me down. How the hell do fight against someone with such a low center of gravity. Your only hope would be to bop 'em on the head Little Bunny Fu-Fu style.
Little Bunny fu-fu hoping through the forest, scooping on up the field mice and bopping them on the head. And down came the fairy godmother and she said, "little bunny fu-fu I don't want to see you scooping up the field mice and bopping them on the head". I'll give you THREE more chances.
Repeat, until little bunny fu-fu has no more chances. Then the fairy godmother scoops up the bunny and bops him on the head.
It's a childrens song. Complete with hand actions.
Repeat, until little bunny fu-fu has no more chances. Then the fairy godmother scoops up the bunny and bops him on the head.
It's a childrens song. Complete with hand actions.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
100...one kick and they are out for the count. A few mortal combat sweep kicks would go a long way as well, might be able to take a couple out at a time that way.