Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What will happen to Brad Treliving after the end of the season?
He should and will be fired 167 17.06%
He should be fired, but will continue as the Flames GM 277 28.29%
He should not and will not be fired 288 29.42%
He should not but will be fired 27 2.76%
Unsure if he should be, but he will be fired 37 3.78%
Unsure if he should be, but he will not be fired 183 18.69%
Voters: 979. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2021, 03:58 PM   #4321
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
Thanks, but I am still on keto, so dumplings are no-go, but beef and broccoli can still work. Not sure where hot & sour soup falls.
Usually right in my lap, but that's a different conversation.
__________________
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:09 PM   #4322
Brad Marsh
Scoring Winger
 
Brad Marsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dar es Salaam
Exp:
Default

Wow this discussion/debate got 1000x better over the last 5 pages or so! Great job CP! Both sides of the debate engaging in actual dialogue, and even though we're far from consensus, everyone making good points and counter-points. The CP I've grown to love! It's nice when both sides of the debate are cordial and drop the escalating sarcasm.

I certainly see both sides of this coin. I actually have really liked Brad Treliving as GM. It's funny, and maybe it's one of the reasons that I'm not a GM or in hockey or anything like that, but I've actually really liked most of Treliving's work "at the time". Most of what he's done has had my support. Trades, free agent signing, RFA extensions, etc. So many times I've come away thinking he really is the Wizard! That would include the Neal signing, and even the Hamonic trade. At the time they seemed like the right moves and I was excited about them.

But here we are 7 years in and it feels like the sum is less than the parts, and that somehow we've digressed. It's crazy.

The difference is that as a fan, I have the luxury of being wrong about any given transaction, but there's a different level of accountability for the GM.

I agree with the poster that cited the Sam Bennett pick and our failure at nailing that #1 C spot with our highest draft pick ever. That one stings and accounts for a lot of the other problems, at least as far as the roster is concerned and the philosophy of building p the middle.

But I think by far the greatest contributor to the team's lack of success over the last few years in particular has been the coaching decisions. Even Peters, but also Ward, and especially Gulutzen. Not often that a GM will get 4 cracks at a head coach.

So here we are today.......I feel really good about Sutter. I'm in the camp that would like to see a bigger shake-up and re-tool, but the likelihood of that happening is getting lower by the day (although could still happen). Instead it looks like the team might give it another shot with this core group under Sutter - and I think I can live with that. Gaudreau is still super dynamic, and I'm still a fan of Monahan. Some Sutter "types" acquired (Pitlick) or rumored (Coleman) could be some of the missing ingredients - I could see it working. So I'd be ok with that. Especially if Markstron can stay healthy. The margin between winning and losing is so slim, that we just need a couple of things that went wrong last to go right this year, and this entire thing could turn around fairly quickly. I do think that could happen.

But I also agree that there are a couple of critical decision points that are on the immediate horizon that will be fascinating to follow: the Gaudreau contract and what to do with the Tkachuk situation. Both of those will in large part define the Treliving era for me at this point, and while the jury is still out on both, we should have a pretty good read fairly soon on how those two situations have been handled.

Last edited by Brad Marsh; 07-25-2021 at 04:14 PM.
Brad Marsh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Brad Marsh For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:13 PM   #4323
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

In 2017, 18 and 19, Treliving made 15 picks total - he’s had four total drafts where he picked 5x or less.

The last two drafts, they selected 15 players. Including 2nd rounders both years - so, we can bitch about a lack of direction all we want, but at least for the last 18 months, they haven’t done anything brain-breakingly stupid.

No overpay for Stone or Hall.

No awful UFA signings since Neal.

Hired a proper coach.

Didn’t pay 1st and 3rd to retain a 37 year old D.

Remove the Smith/McDonald picks from the record, and his 2nd round resume is

-Rasmus
-OK
-Dube
-Parsons
-Kuznetzov
-Stromgren

Nothing wrong with that.

Drafting since Treliving took over has been solid. Not spectacular, but solid.

-Two top-6 wingers - Chucky and Bread
-Two top-4 D - Rasmus, Vali
-6th D - OK
-Two Middle-6 forwards - Dube, Bennett
-One Norris trophy winner - Fox

That’s eight NHLers out of seven drafts. If you don’t consider Kylington graduated, fine.

I’m fine moving off Brad and the whole scouting department, don’t get me wrong, but they seem to find players reasonably well, given their lack of selections.
__________________
Mom and Dad love you, Rowan - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:40 PM   #4324
AustinL_NHL
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Been enjoying the last few pages but had to step in reading these two posters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
I think he had full autonomy and was the decision maker yes, based on everything him and Burke told us. Also his comments on what type of team he wants to build tracks with the moves he made early on (Jiri is probably right that the philosophy changed at some point)

Plus I think it’s more likely that if you felt unprepared for a draft you would defer down the ladder to the scouting department as opposed to up the ladder to the President.

So who really pushed for Hunter Smith? Much more likely it was Button or a regional scout than Burke at that point
How can you possibly think a GM who was only on the job for 7 weeks had complete control over the draft? The scouting team literally builds prospect profiles over the course of multiple years based on the drafting philosophy of the people in charge. You think Treliving came in, said "Scrap all the work you've done over the last year or two and start over. We're doing this my way."? Yea, ok.

It very likely was Button or a regional scout, but that's because they were building their prospect rankings/profiles based on the philosophy set by the man in charge. I can guarantee you that Treliving didn't come in and change the drafting philosophy in his first 7 weeks. That would've been a disaster.

Hell, even if you want to blame him for the 2014 draft, go ahead. The results since then have been tremendous based on the value the Flames have extracted based on their draft slots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
IMO, Tod Button is as good a scout as his brother Craig as a GM
Too bad, Craig didn’t have 20 yrs to see if he got lucky a couple times
I mean, considering the majority of draft models have the Flames ranked right near the top in terms of the value they've been able to extract from their draft picks based on their draft slots (especially since Treliving took over), I guess that means Craig was an excellent GM?

Hate on Tod all you want, but the statistics show that the Flames have been an excellent drafting team with him in charge the last half decade or so. Absolutely no idea how you can argue the Flames have been a poor drafting team, when they've graduated 7 players from Treliving's first 3 full drafts (2015-17), including 5 players outside of the 1st round.

It's hard to ask for much better draft pick value then what the Flames have done under Treliving. There's been some misses like with every other team, but they've graduated prospects at a pretty rapid pace, and quality players at that.

Not to mention in the few years since then, most prospect models and micro-data charts have loved the majority of Flames selections

Find me 20 teams that have been better than the Flames at finding value based on draft slots in that time frame if you think Tod is so bad. Better yet, find me 10. Hell, find me 5 teams.

Hint: you won't

Last edited by AustinL_NHL; 07-25-2021 at 04:55 PM.
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to AustinL_NHL For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:42 PM   #4325
TheChief
Scoring Winger
 
TheChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

You can say whatever you want about Sutter as a GM..one thing he didn't do was sit on his hands.



He was able to actually obtain the top UFA of the summer one year. (Brad may have the record for making the most phone calls though...that counts for something, right?)



He basically did us a favor by jettisoning Dion. Hindsight being 5050.



Yeah he didn't draft good, and yeah he traded lots of picks.... His home runs turned into franchise players for us... He was rather unlucky with the injuries the final Mike Keenan season, I think the flames had their BEST teams since the cup team under Sutters management.
TheChief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheChief For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:42 PM   #4326
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

At this point lots of people want to see change, and since they arent seeing it in the roster, they want it with the management.
TheIronMaiden is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 04:45 PM   #4327
TheChief
Scoring Winger
 
TheChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

I dont blame other teams for not wanting Sean Monahan. Honestly if you trade John your in full rebuild, so really what can Brad do?


Bedard is being drafted in 2023, just saying.

Last edited by TheChief; 07-25-2021 at 04:48 PM.
TheChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 04:54 PM   #4328
flamesgod
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL View Post
Been enjoying the last few pages but had to step in reading these two posters, as it's actually funny how off they are with their posts.



How can you possibly think a GM who was only on the job for 7 weeks had complete control over the draft? The scouting team literally builds prospect profiles over the course of multiple years based on the drafting philosophy of the people in charge. You think Treliving came in, said "Scrap all the work you've done over the last year or two and start over. We're doing this my way."? Yea, ok.

It very likely was Button or a regional scout, but that's because they were building their prospect rankings/profiles based on the philosophy set by the man in charge. I can guarantee you that Treliving didn't come in and change the drafting philosophy in his first 7 weeks. That would've been a disaster.

Hell, even if you want to blame him for the 2014 draft, go ahead. The results since then have been tremendous based on the value the Flames have extracted based on their draft slots.



I mean, considering the majority of draft models have the Flames ranked right near the top in terms of the value they've been able to extract from their draft picks based on their draft slots (especially since Treliving took over), I guess that means Craig was an excellent GM?

Hate on Tod all you want, but the statistics show that the Flames have been an excellent drafting team with him in charge the last half decade or so. Absolutely no idea how you can argue the Flames have been a poor drafting team, when they've graduated 7 players from Treliving's first 3 full drafts (2015-17), including 5 players outside of the 1st round.

It's hard to ask for much better draft pick value then what the Flames have done under Treliving. There's been some misses like with every other team, but they've graduated prospects at a pretty rapid pace, and quality players at that.

Not to mention in the few years since then, most prospect models and micro-data charts have loved the majority of Flames selections

Find me 20 teams that have been better than the Flames at finding value based on draft slots in that time frame if you think Tod is so bad. Better yet, find me 10. Hell, find me 5 teams.

Hint: you won't
Ya, I actually quite like our scouting staff. Because of the last couple of years, I’m actually feeling quite confident in their drafting. Quite the contrast to a few years ago ( before Treliving).
flamesgod is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to flamesgod For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 04:56 PM   #4329
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChief View Post
You can say whatever you want about Sutter as a GM..one thing he didn't do was sit on his hands.



He was able to actually obtain the top UFA of the summer one year. (Brad may have the record for making the most phone calls though...that counts for something, right?)
IIRC Markstrom was the top UFA goalie when he was signed and Tanev wasn’t exactly low ranked as a UFA either (Pietrangelo was the top).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2021, 05:13 PM   #4330
TheChief
Scoring Winger
 
TheChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

^^ Not exactly the same as signing at the time a 26 year old UFA. Markstrom and Tanev both being north of 30
TheChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 05:27 PM   #4331
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChief View Post
^^ Not exactly the same as signing at the time a 26 year old UFA. Markstrom and Tanev both being north of 30
No, they are not the same signing. Thanks. I wouldn’t have known that 26 =/= 30. But I thought the point was signing a top ranked UFA.

And most people thought he overpaid Jaybo.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 05:41 PM   #4332
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Markstrom was 4th in voting for a major NHL award the Summer Brad signed him and the top UFA in his position...he also took him from the Oilers
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 05:43 PM   #4333
TheChief
Scoring Winger
 
TheChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

to compare a 26 year old UFA D (I believe youngest player to ever hit UFA) to a 30 year old late bloomer G...


Lets put it this way, the market for Jbouw would have been at the time 29 teams.
TheChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 05:50 PM   #4334
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChief View Post
to compare a 26 year old UFA D (I believe youngest player to ever hit UFA) to a 30 year old late bloomer G...


Lets put it this way, the market for Jbouw would have been at the time 29 teams.
He wanted to play in Western Canada though
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2021, 06:10 PM   #4335
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChief View Post
to compare a 26 year old UFA D (I believe youngest player to ever hit UFA) to a 30 year old late bloomer G...


Lets put it this way, the market for Jbouw would have been at the time 29 teams.
He paid a 3rd and a player for rights that normally cost a 5th or so. And then he signed him to a really rich contract. And sent some good players packing to do it.

It’s a lot easier to sign a UFA if you guarantee them their ask, which Sutter essentially did by paying a big price just for rights.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2021, 08:44 PM   #4336
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

So many teams being active and creative to improve their roster.

No way this thread should drop off the first page views until the genius in charge makes even a single move....
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2021, 09:00 PM   #4337
Macman
Self Imposed Retirement
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think Brad is also in a tough spot, you don't want to deal the good players you do have for less than what you think is at least fair. Who knows what the offers are, better to stick with the team you have and become a seller at the deadline.

Maybe they think the team is good enough, probably need at least 2 top six forwards and a top 4 D yet.
Macman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2021, 09:12 PM   #4338
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macman View Post
I think Brad is also in a tough spot, you don't want to deal the good players you do have for less than what you think is at least fair. Who knows what the offers are, better to stick with the team you have and become a seller at the deadline.

Maybe they think the team is good enough, probably need at least 2 top six forwards and a top 4 D yet.
If he's been trying to move Monahan for 12+ months as rumoured, and can't find a deal, then perhaps what he thinks of his own players is incorrect. If they think the team is anywhere near good enough then they are horrible at their job and incredibly stubborn.

That being said, tomorrow is the big day. It's time Treliving gets back to operating at a "Treliving circa 2015" level. Hopefully this is just a case of a Wizard arriving precisely when he means to.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2021, 09:14 PM   #4339
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
So many teams being active and creative to improve their roster.

No way this thread should drop off the first page views until the genius in charge makes even a single move....
Who has improved though?
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2021, 09:17 PM   #4340
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Who has improved though?
Apparently, Edmonton. They added Darnell Nurse, Mike Smith, Tyson Barrie, and Ryan Nugent-wait a sec
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021