12-13-2017, 08:42 AM
|
#4241
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
The CSEC is a "massive multi-national company"?
|
I think he was referring to the NHL.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 08:42 AM
|
#4242
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
The CSEC is a "massive multi-national company"?
|
The article is referring to the NHL getting invovled.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 08:43 AM
|
#4243
|
In the Sin Bin
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
The CSEC is a "massive multi-national company"?
|
I think they are referring to the NHL, hence the title of the article.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 08:52 AM
|
#4244
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Fair enough...was just going off the quote.
Even then though...did the NHL "inject" itself in the election? Or did Bettman go to bat for his boss?
It's just so weird to me that people get all up in arms about what the NHL/CSEC is doing in regards to a negotiation. It's obvious they are going to want the best deal possible for the ownership group....to do otherwise would be counter-productive to all ownership groups.
__________________
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 08:58 AM
|
#4245
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Fair enough...was just going off the quote.
Even then though...did the NHL "inject" itself in the election? Or did Bettman go to bat for his boss?
It's just so weird to me that people get all up in arms about what the NHL/CSEC is doing in regards to a negotiation. It's obvious they are going to want the best deal possible for the ownership group....to do otherwise would be counter-productive to all ownership groups.
|
I agree, and the same applies to the "threats" to move (of which there haven't been any serious overt examples. I mean, when an owner or King is asked "if you can't get a deal done what will the Flames do - might they move?", how is it a smart tactic to say "No that could never happen - we will just have to build our own arena."? Of course you have to admit that moving is a possibility, if you are also claiming that you need a deal with city to be able to make a new arena feasible.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 09:35 AM
|
#4246
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
The owners would be persona non grata in Calgary if they ever moved the team. They aren't going to damage their legacies in Calgary.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-13-2017, 09:37 AM
|
#4247
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
The owners would be persona non grata in Calgary if they ever moved the team. They aren't going to damage their legacies in Calgary.
|
The current group? Sure.
If some outside entity came in and bought them? They wouldn't care.
__________________
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 09:54 AM
|
#4248
|
Franchise Player
|
i assumed francis retweeted it because it was originally tweeted by the herald. i assume the herald originally tweeted it because they own the content
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
This right here should tell you everything you need to know about Eric Francis:
|
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 09:58 AM
|
#4249
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
This right here should tell you everything you need to know about Eric Francis:
|
Someone re-tweeted their own article? Are you new to twitter?
In fact I stopped following some people because they kept re-tweeting their articles so many times.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:10 AM
|
#4250
|
Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Someone re-tweeted their own article? Are you new to twitter?
In fact I stopped following some people because they kept re-tweeting their articles so many times.
|
Yeah, it's the same as on Instragram where corporations and fledgling companies start following you randomly in hopes of spiking up their own follower count. It's disingenuous and for self-serving purposes.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:22 AM
|
#4251
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stamps
So if the Flames leave it's about 30 to 45 million dollars lost to the city over 30 years ....
|
They would lose nothing if the team is demanding free transit.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:31 AM
|
#4252
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck
They would lose nothing if the team is demanding free transit.
|
I think asking , not demanding ... not a deal breaker ...
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to stamps For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:36 AM
|
#4253
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RM14
I don't know either. I am under the impression that Murray Edwards has the most shares, but I doubt he has more than 50% control, or enough to make decisions such as moving the team on his own authority.
|
With the Oilers and Katz, the way I remember it is he was negotiating a price with X number of owners and once he got over 50% shares in the team, the dominos started to fall and he got all the rest of them. I imagine there wouldn't be a lot of interest in holding onto your shares in that type of situation, however one big difference between now and then is that franchise values seem to be skyrocketing up and up so maybe they would hold onto their shares.
On the flip side, if an owner held for example 20% of the shares and the majority owner wanted to move the team they would probably bail because they wouldn't want to be associated with the move and/or pay the relocation fee out of pocket.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:38 AM
|
#4254
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
The current group? Sure.
If some outside entity came in and bought them? They wouldn't care.
|
If they sold the team to a group that moved the team, they would still be persona non grata.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:50 AM
|
#4255
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: BELTLINE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
If they sold the team to a group that moved the team, they would still be persona non grata.
|
Nah, for most people Nenshi would wear that one.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:55 AM
|
#4256
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
Nah, for most people Nenshi would wear that one.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...rvey-1.4110440
Most Calgarians would support the city getting involved in the construction of a new arena to replace the Saddledome — as long as it doesn't increase their taxes.
In Quebec's case, Aubut says he was not reviled:
http://montrealgazette.com/sports/ho...turn-to-quebec
Aubut says he was never reviled in Quebec for selling the Nordiques, having been decorated by the city while still being referred to as “the kid of the Grand Allée,” his long-used nickname.
“The people of Quebec have been terrific,” he said. “They were disappointed the team left, but they knew how hard I worked to get a deal done. We were maybe a couple years from winning the Stanley Cup.”
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 11:03 AM
|
#4257
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
“The people of Quebec have been terrific,” he said. “They were disappointed the team left, but they knew how hard I worked to get a deal done. We were maybe a couple years from winning the Stanley Cup.”
|
Didn't they win the Cup the following year? A bit of an odd comment.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 11:09 AM
|
#4258
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilliwack, B.C
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751
Didn't they win the Cup the following year? A bit of an odd comment.
|
Roy would have never been traded to the Nords , if they didn't relocate to Denver
Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to calgaryred For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-13-2017, 11:11 AM
|
#4259
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Calgary
|
I would imagine the split of people blaming the Flames owners vs. Nenshi would pretty much inverse the split of people who support either side right now, which is pretty solidly in support of the mayor. So most would blame the owners and they'd likely feel the backlash in attendance for the Stamps, Hitmen and Roughnecks.
__________________
The Delhi police have announced the formation of a crack team dedicated to nabbing the elusive 'Monkey Man' and offered a reward for his -- or its -- capture.
|
|
|
12-13-2017, 11:12 AM
|
#4260
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
The current group? Sure.
If some outside entity came in and bought them? They wouldn't care.
|
But there aren't any potential markets that are as strong as the market the Flames currently reside. The only reason to move this Flames team would be one of pride, such as, Edwards not willing to publicly lose this negotiation with Nenshi.
An outside entity would not hold the same animosity toward Nenshi, and so I can't see a scenario where relocation would be on the table with a new ownership group.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.
|
|