01-19-2019, 02:49 PM
|
#1561
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Regrettably we're in the process of building a sewage treatment plant as mandated by the feds, even though the majority of the experts (marine biologists, etc.) have stated that it's completely unnecessary and probably constitutes more of a strain on the environment than the current setup.
|
I'm not sure if that science passes the smell test.
If anyone wanted to run a negative ad campaign, I'm sure 'swim the majestic waters, ripe with a million poops a day!' would be all that they would need.
It seems so shockingly third world, but I am glad that something is being done about it.
__________________
"We don't even know who our best player is yet. It could be any one of us at this point." - Peter LaFleur, player/coach, Average Joe's Gymnasium
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 03:03 PM
|
#1562
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I'm not sure if that science passes the smell test.
If anyone wanted to run a negative ad campaign, I'm sure 'swim the majestic waters, ripe with a million poops a day!' would be all that they would need.
It seems so shockingly third world, but I am glad that something is being done about it.
|
It only works because they pump it into a fast moving current (Juan de Fuca) so it dissipates quickly. If everyone did this or if there wasn’t a fast moving straight to pump it into it would obviously be a problem.
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 04:45 PM
|
#1563
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sundre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
It only works because they pump it into a fast moving current (Juan de Fuca) so it dissipates quickly. If everyone did this or if there wasn’t a fast moving straight to pump it into it would obviously be a problem.
|
What about all the inorganics that get flushed, medications, plastics and rubbers?
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 04:55 PM
|
#1564
|
Participant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duruss
What about all the inorganics that get flushed, medications, plastics and rubbers?
|
Fish need birth control too. Their body, their choice.
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 04:57 PM
|
#1565
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duruss
What about all the inorganics that get flushed, medications, plastics and rubbers?
|
It’s filtered prior to release,
Modern sewage treatment doesn’t remove hormones like birth control either
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 04:58 PM
|
#1566
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I'm not sure if that science passes the smell test.
If anyone wanted to run a negative ad campaign, I'm sure 'swim the majestic waters, ripe with a million poops a day!' would be all that they would need.
It seems so shockingly third world, but I am glad that something is being done about it.
|
An article from 2 years ago where Divers are claiming that years of dumping raw sewage are killing the ocean floor, including video
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...oria-1.3762234
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-19-2019, 05:05 PM
|
#1567
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
|
I think that is acknowledged by the dumpers of raw sewage that there are small local affects but overall the affects aren’t measurable and therefore is the best way to dispose of waste.
Citing an article like that is like posting a list of pipeline spills and saying they aren’t safe. It is the best technology available for the given task.
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 05:14 PM
|
#1568
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think that is acknowledged by the dumpers of raw sewage that there are small local affects but overall the affects aren’t measurable and therefore is the best way to dispose of waste.
Citing an article like that is like posting a list of pipeline spills and saying they aren’t safe. It is the best technology available for the given task.
|
Except it’s not. Unless you have a mechanism to disperse it quickly. It will be an issue eventually. Toxins are building up, albeit slowly.
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 08:03 PM
|
#1569
|
Franchise Player
|
Double post
|
|
|
01-19-2019, 08:04 PM
|
#1570
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Except it’s not. Unless you have a mechanism to disperse it quickly. It will be an issue eventually. Toxins are building up, albeit slowly.
|
Do we have any evidence that supports this theory of toxins building up over time as opposed to higher concentrations closer to the tale pipe as they are dispersed?
|
|
|
01-20-2019, 02:33 AM
|
#1571
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Do we have any evidence that supports this theory of toxins building up over time as opposed to higher concentrations closer to the tale pipe as they are dispersed?
|
The 1996 study everyone quotes that it’s adtually a good thing?
|
|
|
01-20-2019, 10:40 PM
|
#1572
|
Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Was perusing Twitter today and came across the @UniteAlberta Twitter account, the "Official Twitter account for the office of @JKenney, Leader of the United Conservatives and Alberta's Official Opposition."
I gotta say, that is some mind-bending and combative stuff coming from the social media outlet representing him. Is this really the Twitter account that represents him? I see the UCP and Kenney himself have their own Twitter accounts, but if this really is his representative Twitter handle that's just nuts. I can't imagine this is actually representing him. Can anyone verify or does anyone know?
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 07:52 AM
|
#1573
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
All food/beverage production requires insane amounts of L water/kg production:
Chocolate - 17,200
Almonds - 16,100
Beef - 15,400
Cashews - 14,200
Chickpeas - 10,100
Lentils - 5,900
Chicken - 4,300
Rice - 2,500
Oats - 2,400
Coffee (1kg of Brewed) - 2,300
Bread - 1,600
Avacado - 1,200
Milk - 1,000
What would be interesting to see is rather than L/kg of production, it was L/g protein or some other nutritional component. Coffee and Chocolate would obviously look awful in this scenario.
|
I heard almonds was a huge drain and is part of the problem in California.
more than beef, though? wow. that's an insane amount of water.
as for chocolate, no wonder half the "chocolate" out there doesn't really have any or very little compared to what it used to.
I noticed this Christmas a lot more items being listed as "chocolate flavored"
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 08:05 AM
|
#1574
|
Franchise Player
|
Do cocoa trees actually get watered though? Same with coffee beans. I assume becuase these usually come from 3rd world countries they are just using rainwater so any negative effects to their production are probably nowhere near as high crops like California almonds hat actually need them to be manually watered.
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 09:23 AM
|
#1575
|
Franchise Player
|
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...xqTKoQsch0_Ze8
Lawyer questions Jason Kenney's Alberta residency while claiming living expenses in Ottawa
Quote:
A lawyer and political activist is accusing Alberta United Conservative Party Leader Jason Kenney of claiming his primary residence was in Calgary while living in Ottawa, an allegation Kenney disputes.
|
Quote:
The documents show Kenney collected secondary residence subsidies in Ottawa between 2012-15 of about $10,000 each year, while his mother's retirement home in Calgary was listed as his address with Elections Canada.
|
Quote:
Morrow said if the bungalow was Kenney's secondary residence, he believes the flight records don't back that up — showing that Kenney only expensed 10 parliamentary flights in 2013-14, and only four in 2014-15.
"This infrequent travel to Calgary seems to suggest that he was not, in fact, permanently residing in Calgary," Morrow said.
"I am concerned that Mr. Kenney engaged in a scheme similar to the one employed by Senator Mike Duffy. If Mr. Kenney has nothing to hide, he should immediately release his tax returns, his tenancy agreement, and his travel itineraries for the period in question."
|
This from the former President and CEO of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 09:51 AM
|
#1576
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
|
I never understood why people would be so greedy as to jeapardize their reputations over what really amounts to a minor financial gain compared to their regular incomes.
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 10:15 AM
|
#1577
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Biggest joke back when Kenney was an MP in SE Calgary was that he'd win the constituency without even showing up. Looks like that was kind of true!
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 10:23 AM
|
#1578
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius
I never understood why people would be so greedy as to jeapardize their reputations over what really amounts to a minor financial gain compared to their regular incomes.
|
Uh, did you not read the article?
He lived in his mother's retirement home's non-existent basement to recoup $900 a month because he loves his mother, you unempathetic cretin.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
|
|
|
|
01-21-2019, 10:36 AM
|
#1579
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
All food/beverage production requires insane amounts of L water/kg production:
Chocolate - 17,200
Almonds - 16,100
Beef - 15,400
Cashews - 14,200
Chickpeas - 10,100
Lentils - 5,900
Chicken - 4,300
Rice - 2,500
Oats - 2,400
Coffee (1kg of Brewed) - 2,300
Bread - 1,600
Avacado - 1,200
Milk - 1,000
What would be interesting to see is rather than L/kg of production, it was L/g protein or some other nutritional component. Coffee and Chocolate would obviously look awful in this scenario.
|
I am really late to this point, but water usage of animals to plant products is not always a fair comparison. For example, A lot of the water it takes to produce beef is actually tied up in the feed of beef, that is pasture grass and barely, both of which require quite a bit less water than most crops. Also, the water which cows drink is often recycled through urine. Also, in this equation they include the water cows which are not slaughtered consume.
We know cows require a lot of water, that being said, their relative environmental impact as it relates to water usage is far less intense than lentils for example which need a lot of water and nutrients from a small amount of land, as apposed to cows which take up a water from a larger catchment radius.
That being said, other meat products take far less water than cows, goats, pigs and chickens for example are, from a water consumption perspective, more environmentally conscious than other protein sources lentils included.
Last edited by TheIronMaiden; 01-21-2019 at 10:41 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.
|
|