05-03-2021, 10:06 AM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
You think his value is going to go up a year or 2 from now?
|
It’s going to be more than zero. Which is what you get if Gaudreau thwarts any trade post NTC and then walks. This exercise makes that a problem.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:07 AM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
You think his value is going to go up a year or 2 from now?
|
Doesn't mean you can't trade both Johnny and Gaudreau this off season. The latter should yield a strong return, while Monahan may get you a mid-level return at best. Either way, Flames should have good foundation to build with if they trade both of them this off season.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:09 AM
|
#43
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
1. Tkachuk (has most value, some troubling red flags)
2. Monahan (too soft for playoff hockey)
3. Gaudreau (could be persuaded to keep)
Last edited by troutman; 05-03-2021 at 10:17 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:10 AM
|
#44
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
How is this a toss up? Team is weak as heck down the middle Monahan needs to be gone even if short term the team gets worse.
|
Team is weak down the middle so you trade the team’s best C?
Depends what you’re getting back but that logic seems odd to me. Wouldn’t it be better to create a package around wingers/dmen/prospects to get a #1 C, allowing Monahan to be an excellent #2C? Then you have the depth that you say is lacking.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:10 AM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
You think his value is going to go up a year or 2 from now?
|
Depends on if his current struggles are related to a correctable injury or not.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:13 AM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
|
Out of that list, I would trade Gaudreau, Backlund and Giordano.
Gaudreau has had a decent year considering how everyone else has played and should net a fair return, with the current contract expiring he's a no-brainer.
Backlund and Giordano need to move on as they are getting long in the tooth.
I think we'd be selling low on anything else.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:19 AM
|
#47
|
Scoring Winger
|
I think Lindholm is the only untouchable skater, while not elite he's the type of player you use to build a team.
Don't know the room obviously but his compete seems high and he plays 200 ft
__________________
I have Strong opinions about things I know very little about.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:20 AM
|
#48
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
Team is weak down the middle so you trade the team’s best C?
Depends what you’re getting back but that logic seems odd to me. Wouldn’t it be better to create a package around wingers/dmen/prospects to get a #1 C, allowing Monahan to be an excellent #2C? Then you have the depth that you say is lacking.
|
There are a few options: Lindholm-Backlund-Ryan-rookie in a rebuild starting with moving Monahan. Elite C (or closer anyway)-Lindholm-Backlund-Ryan if Monahan is part of a trade for a better C or you get one in another deal (other than Eichel I have no idea who).
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:24 AM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Sean Monahan is the absolute slam dunk answer here. Get something for him now before his value really craters.
|
I think it likely already has. Not sure you could move him without take back a contact you might not like.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:25 AM
|
#50
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
In it's current state this team can not be successful with both Monahan and Backlund. Monahan is not outproducing Backlund anymore and Backlunds game is far more rounded. They need to get Monahans salary slot to be a top 6 producing right winger.
I don't think switching out one player does much of anything though. By this time next year they need to have all three of Monahan, Giordano, and Gaudreau traded in my opinion and be working towards pretty much changing out every player within the next 4 years. But I don't see that happening.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:30 AM
|
#51
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Depends on if his current struggles are related to a correctable injury or not.
|
What do you consider recent? 2018-2019 he has a strong season, then:
Among centers
2019-2020 34th in scoring (48) -16
2020-2021 57th in scoring (28) -6
Has he been injured for 2 straight seasons? You tell me, and if so sounds like a long term problem that can't be fixed. Either way he can't be the #1 center.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:31 AM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Gaudreau, get value back for him
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:34 AM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
|
If you're trading for culture shake-up, for effectiveness (or lack there of) I'd go with Monahan.
If you're trading for contracts, because you can't re-up, then Johnny.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:34 AM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
What do you consider recent? 2018-2019 he has a strong season, then:
Among centers
2019-2020 34th in scoring (48) -16
2020-2021 57th in scoring (28) -6
Has he been injured for 2 straight seasons? You tell me, and if so sounds like a long term problem that can't be fixed. Either way he can't be the #1 center.
|
Both of those seasons are COVID seasons, with a weird and unpredictable off-season which makes treatment pretty hard. So it’s possible.
Monahan isn’t now a 1C and at best is a marginal one. But he’s paid like a strong 2C around the league.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:36 AM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hyperbole Chamber
|
Can’t be just one this summer.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:37 AM
|
#56
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Fort McMurray
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
Monahan - he's done here. Needs a fresh start as does the org
Gaudreau - not sure he's a long term asset, so must look at moving asap
Giordano - symbiotic move at this stage
My opinion is that 2of 3, at least, must be moved.
|
I agree with this.
I believe this organization is still in the mindset of "win now" whether or not we agree with that. Hopefully like the Hamilton trade, Treliving can turn Johnny and Monahan into valuable player for player trades.
Lindholm, Tkachuk, Mangi, Dube, Tanev, Hanifin, Andersson, Markstrom are good pieces to still compete with.
If the Flames keep Treliving employed, this will be the biggest offseason in Flames history. He absolutely has to win these trades and free agency.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:37 AM
|
#57
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
In it's current state this team can not be successful with both Monahan and Backlund. Monahan is not outproducing Backlund anymore and Backlunds game is far more rounded. They need to get Monahans salary slot to be a top 6 producing right winger.
I don't think switching out one player does much of anything though. By this time next year they need to have all three of Monahan, Giordano, and Gaudreau traded in my opinion and be working towards pretty much changing out every player within the next 4 years. But I don't see that happening.
|
Backlund is 6 years older..
You don’t keep Backlund over Monahan even if he has struggled lately.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:43 AM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles
Backlund is 6 years older..
You don’t keep Backlund over Monahan even if he has struggled lately.
|
Both need to go if possible but the OP was choose one. I keep Backlund over Monahan.
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:45 AM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles
Backlund is 6 years older..
You don’t keep Backlund over Monahan even if he has struggled lately.
|
I guess it depends on what Monny is likely to be in the future. Presumably the Flames have a better handle than us as what his problems are.
Does he have a chronic type injury which suggest his offence will never be what it was?
|
|
|
05-03-2021, 10:55 AM
|
#60
|
Self Imposed Retirement
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Calgary
|
I'd pick Rasmus Anderson from your list there. You can still get good return for him and he's probably the most easy to replace.
I think a big issue with Sean Monahan here now and even to extent Johnny Gaudreau is coaching.
Where are the set plays to get Sean the puck, maybe I'm missing them but I don't think they're there. If he gets traded to a team like Tampa, he'll do nothing but score because that's how they play. Monahan is a goal scorer who doesn't need multiple chances and for that reason I would keep him.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.
|
|