Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-30-2021, 01:48 PM   #341
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
I don't understand - is O'Toole indirectly suggesting that COVID originated out of Canada now? What the f*** was the point on this video? Seems to use a lot of time and words to explain a whole lot of... nothing, really.
I believe the point is "Trudeau bad and scary, vote for me!"
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2021, 02:50 PM   #342
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
I believe the point is "Trudeau bad and scary, vote for me!"
It's hard to think that the cons actually believe they can win the next election with their current Trump-lite approach. If I was a conspiracy believer I would almost think their real goal is to keep Trudeau in power as long as possible, because their tactics are going to accomplish just that
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hemi-Cuda For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2021, 03:06 PM   #343
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudoreality View Post
The title of this thread still really bugs me. It is not as bad as before, but the origins of coronaviruses is not what is being discussed, but rather the originals of SARS-CoV-2 specifically.
THE Coronavirus, as in the one we are all talking about.

It's the same way that there are many dudes, but only one gets 'The' in front.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2021, 03:35 PM   #344
pseudoreality
Powerplay Quarterback
 
pseudoreality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
THE Coronavirus, as in the one we are all talking about.

It's the same way that there are many dudes, but only one gets 'The' in front.
That's what they said about "The" World War or "The" Great War. Or in this case, it is like calling F7 "the" Fast and Furious Movie.
pseudoreality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2021, 10:14 AM   #345
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudoreality View Post
Or in this case, it is like calling F7 "the" Fast and Furious Movie.
I think you could be forgiven for talking about "the Fast and Furious Movie" in the context of "the Fast and Furious Movie that has somehow killed the equivalent of the population of Los Angeles worldwide".

Everybody knows you aren't talkin' Tokyo Drift.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2021, 06:49 PM   #346
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Chinese government is despicable.

Journalist who reported on Wuhan near death in Chinese prison.

https://apple.news/Az4-_HaYAS6-dweVZnw0lCg

How anyone can have anything to do with that country is beyond imagination.

Damn Trudeau have some balls and boycott their Olympics.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-09-2022, 05:46 PM   #347
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

So in 24 months this went from crazy racist fringe theory to ya maybe probably.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/who-c...data-1.6483210
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2022, 01:33 AM   #348
curves2000
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch View Post
So in 24 months this went from crazy racist fringe theory to ya maybe probably.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/who-c...data-1.6483210

The truth of the matter is that a whole host of people who are suppose to know, who's job it is to protect us and a lot more people in charge knew a lot more than they let on.

Plenty of evidence from the start that lot's of things about Covid were not what people were letting on. From a potential lab leak, to the potential and probable aspect of it being airborne to more.

I see the same thing happening with our financial sector these days. We are past the point of no return in a lot of ways with what is happening and how far we have gone.

The people who's sole job it is to protect and regulate and spot the dangers aren't in the position to protect us. It's scary
curves2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2022, 07:24 AM   #349
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch View Post
So in 24 months this went from crazy racist fringe theory to ya maybe probably.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/who-c...data-1.6483210
That article does not say probably, it’s saying possibly.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2022, 02:12 AM   #350
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

The WHO, that is the World Health Organization, created and funded to protect the “World”from just this very thing, is a puppet of the Chinese government and an epic failure.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2022, 02:48 PM   #351
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
That article does not say probably, it’s saying possibly.
The “maybe probably” was my tongue in cheek way of saying it has legs, and likely more that anyone cares to admit publicly.

The COVID came from US mail China has been pushing has gone nowhere. Rightfully so as it was and is a full crock.

However If there wasn’t much hanging around the trail would have gone cold here too, but this is feeling more and more like there is serious smoke, and China is going to cover it up until the coast is clear.

Honestly is what it is. If China doesn’t want transparency fine, but its court of opinion as the alternative.
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 02:49 AM   #352
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

So after testing over 100,000 bats plus other animals in China and not one positive result for COVID 19 but we're supposed to believe that's where it came from, lets don't talk about the first cases were in Wuhan that's a 1000 miles away from these nasty bats that shut down the world for 2 years, lets don't talk about that government controlled virology lab in Wuhan that studies coronaviruses!

Sure China sure
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 05:42 PM   #353
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

nm
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2022, 12:24 PM   #354
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

There was an interesting study released yesterday on the genetic diversity of the earliest coronavirus cases. Based on the evidence in the paper, it's unlikely that the earliest SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans came from a single source (as you'd expect with a lab leak). There were two distinct lineages in the samples taken in the first couple of weeks of the pandemic with mutations that would have been unlikely to have occurred in humans in such a short period of time. So based on that, the authors suggest that the most plausible explanation is that the virus was circulating in animals long enough to produce the mutations, and then there were multiple independent zoonotic introductions in Wuhan, two of which were successful (for lack of a better word) at producing spread within humans.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8337

Also of note, at least one of the co-authors of the paper had in the past publicly called for an open and independent investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and said we cannot dismiss the lab leak hypothesis. So this likely isn't a case of scientists trying to find evidence to support a preferred conclusion.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 09:28 AM   #355
jjgallow
Crash and Bang Winger
 
jjgallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
That article does not say probably, it’s saying possibly.
It is still a full 180 on their original position as science keeps causing problems for them
jjgallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:34 AM   #356
jjgallow
Crash and Bang Winger
 
jjgallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
There was an interesting study released yesterday on the genetic diversity of the earliest coronavirus cases. Based on the evidence in the paper, it's unlikely that the earliest SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans came from a single source (as you'd expect with a lab leak). There were two distinct lineages in the samples taken in the first couple of weeks of the pandemic with mutations that would have been unlikely to have occurred in humans in such a short period of time. So based on that, the authors suggest that the most plausible explanation is that the virus was circulating in animals long enough to produce the mutations, and then there were multiple independent zoonotic introductions in Wuhan, two of which were successful (for lack of a better word) at producing spread within humans.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8337

Also of note, at least one of the co-authors of the paper had in the past publicly called for an open and independent investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and said we cannot dismiss the lab leak hypothesis. So this likely isn't a case of scientists trying to find evidence to support a preferred conclusion.

However, it doesn't take much to conclude that the Virus originating separately in two places and then emerging at the same time is basically impossible. The study is actually stating that both lineages have a common origin.

So, to clarify, the study is in fact clearly saying that there was a single source.

The notion that the virus passed through animals is not inconsistent with lab theories. One of many examples:
https://www.science.org/content/arti...de-mice-sicker

Last edited by jjgallow; 07-30-2022 at 10:19 AM. Reason: Na
jjgallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 11:18 AM   #357
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjgallow View Post
However, it doesn't take much to conclude that the Virus originating separately in two places and then emerging at the same time is basically impossible. The study is actually stating that both lineages have a common origin.

So, to clarify, the study is in fact clearly saying that there was a single source.
Obviously they both have a common origin. But they're different enough from one another that the chance of the mutations happening in the period of a couple of weeks with a few dozen infections in humans is extremely low. Which means there likely would have been enough spread among animals to generate the two mutations and then the different lineages were transmitted to humans (at least) two separate times from animals. That's inconsistent with a lab leak hypothesis, where a single variant would have come out of the lab into humans.

Further bolstering the theory that both lineages came from animals separately is the fact that:

a) both lineages were found at the wet market,

b) lineage A is more closely related to bat coronaviruses than lineage B (and is thus likely the older of the two lineages). But lineage A was found in later infections than lineage B, which is the opposite of what you'd expect if the mutations happened in humans.

Taken together, that would imply that both lineages existed in animals before being transmitted to humans.

Quote:
The notion that the virus passed through animals is not inconsistent with lab theories. One of many examples:
https://www.science.org/content/arti...de-mice-sicker
Can you come up with a plausible scenario where two different versions of the same virus would escape from a lab separately? I mean, I guess it's theoretically possible (e.g. there were multiple breaches in a BSL-4 lab, it came out of the lab into animals where it mutated before coming back into humans, animals from the lab were sold to wet markets, etc.) but it makes the hypothesis a lot less likely.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 01:24 PM   #358
jjgallow
Crash and Bang Winger
 
jjgallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
Can you come up with a plausible scenario where two different versions of the same virus would escape from a lab separately? I mean, I guess it's theoretically possible (e.g. there were multiple breaches in a BSL-4 lab, it came out of the lab into animals where it mutated before coming back into humans, animals from the lab were sold to wet markets, etc.) but it makes the hypothesis a lot less likely.
We're talking about one of the most contagious multi-species viruses ever, so, yes, but, also not needed.

I would assume most likey that there was one initial escape from the lab. Now, we're giving the lab possibly more credit than they deserve in assuming that.

What happens after that, however, is inherently random and we can actually expect to see multiple transmission paths and lineages.

All the humans who worked at the lab also had close contact with mice, bats, etc. As did surrounding residents with at least mice.

So it could have gone:

Human->mouse->human->bat->mouse->Human

Bat->human->mouse->bat->human

Mouse->human-farm animal->mouse->bat->farm animal at the market->human


Or about 10000 other combinations.

None of which rule out the lab in any way or explain away the clear splices seen in the virus .

I honestly never heard of a human-only theory. I believe you that there surely was one but can't have been well thought out.

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4374287

https://www.propublica.org/article/h...-coronaviruses

Last edited by jjgallow; 07-30-2022 at 01:44 PM.
jjgallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 02:23 PM   #359
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Aside from the intellectual curiosity, what value can be assigned to knowing if the was lab leaked overall?

I don't think the knowledge would have any tangible effect on the world. There are people who have far better experience and information in the area them me, who will write the history books. The seen to be leaning that this was not lab leaked right now, so I lean that way. If they change they're minds I will listen to the new and old explanations and will probably follow them to their new conclusion
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 02:23 PM   #360
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjgallow View Post
We're talking about one of the most contagious multi-species viruses ever, so, yes, but, also not needed.

I would assume most likey that there was one initial escape from the lab. Now, we're giving the lab possibly more credit than they deserve in assuming that.

What happens after that, however, is inherently random and we can actually expect to see multiple transmission paths and lineages.

All the humans who worked at the lab also had close contact with mice, bats, etc. As did surrounding residents with at least mice.

So it could have gone:

Human->mouse->human->bat->mouse->Human

Bat->human->mouse->bat->human

Mouse->human-farm animal->mouse->bat->farm animal at the market->human

Or about 10000 other combinations.

None of which rule out the lab in any way or explain away the clear splices seen in the virus .
So on the one hand it's one of the most contagious multi-species viruses ever in existence. But at the same time you think it transmitted undetected in humans long enough to go to and from a bunch of animal reservoirs, remained transmitting in the animal populations long enough to develop the different lineages (without infecting basically any humans), and then jumped back into humans where it took off quickly. That doesn't seem very plausible given the growth rates we've seen in immunologically naive human populations.

And it's also at odds with basically every lab leak hypothesis I've seen. The primary foundation of most of the lab leak hypotheses is that there is zero evidence (or even plausibility) that SARS-CoV-2 spread in humans undetected for a period of time. Their whole argument is that it came out of nowhere via a lab leak, which is why it went from nothing to a pandemic in a few weeks. That doesn't really fit with the idea that it spread around in humans and animals around Wuhan long enough to generate the genetic diversity that existed.

Quote:
I honestly never heard of a human-only theory. I believe you that there surely was one but can't have been well thought out.
That's basically the only legitimate and plausible theory of the lab leak. The theory is that a worker (or workers) at the lab unknowingly became infected with a coronavirus they were working on and/or that animals in the lab had been infected with. Some posit that it was a virus that an animal came into the lab infected with (the same idea as the bat virus that killed those miners in 2012), while others suggest that it was the result of gain of function research. Either way, the worker(s) would have then spread it outside the lab and it took off quickly from there.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021