02-16-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#21
|
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by underGRADFlame
But she looks nothing like Mara Jade! (In my mind)
|
God I hated her, I was glad when her brat of a Nephew killed her.
She was annoying and way over powered in the books. She was darn near as powerful as Luke, and she nearly beat Vader.
But then again she had the title of the Emperor's Hand, I was really disappointed when they introduced her and that stupid title, and I thought to myself.
"Well that's not what I thought her role would be as the Emperor's hand"
I can just image a giggling Palpatine looking around to make sure that the Imperial Throne room and then undoing his zipper and saying in his evil voice
"Mara Jade, it is time to fulfill your destiny, and take Vaders place in my lap"
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 10:49 AM
|
#22
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 11:00 AM
|
#23
|
|
Norm!
|
Well duh to no Han Solo, any flashback would probably be to a younger Han, and if he appeared as a ghost it would be really really really stupid.
I'm surprised that Chewie might not be in it, but I would assume that Finn is going to take up the role of the Han Solo type and they'll probably give him a different weird alien as a side kick.
Kenny Baker not coming back would be sad, but he's getting up there in terms of age sooo.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 11:26 AM
|
#24
|
|
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Well duh to no Han Solo, any flashback would probably be to a younger Han, and if he appeared as a ghost it would be really really really stupid.
I'm surprised that Chewie might not be in it, but I would assume that Finn is going to take up the role of the Han Solo type and they'll probably give him a different weird alien as a side kick.
Kenny Baker not coming back would be sad, but he's getting up there in terms of age sooo.
|
I think the same goes for Mayhew... the guy can barely stand anymore... they had another actor doing the scenes where chewie wasn't sitting.
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 11:37 AM
|
#25
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm surprised they even bother with an R2 actor anymore. You would think it would be a lot cheaper just to make it remote controlled.
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:03 PM
|
#26
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Well duh to no Han Solo, any flashback would probably be to a younger Han, and if he appeared as a ghost it would be really really really stupid.
I'm surprised that Chewie might not be in it, but I would assume that Finn is going to take up the role of the Han Solo type and they'll probably give him a different weird alien as a side kick.
Kenny Baker not coming back would be sad, but he's getting up there in terms of age sooo.
|
Uh guys? Maybe no spoilers?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#27
|
|
Franchise Player
|
How can we discuss a direct sequel that doesn't mention plot points form the previous movie?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#28
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
How can we discuss a direct sequel that doesn't mention plot points form the previous movie?
|
Not to mention, as CC pointed out...we know that Solo's not in this one already. Chewie is likely there in his new format, as is R2. They don't need the same actor under the suit.
Also, if they aren't there...well, it is quite a bit later, it may be time to move on.
And I also see this thread as having a lot of conjecture as it's likely to be a continuation the SW7 thread.
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#29
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
How can we discuss a direct sequel that doesn't mention plot points form the previous movie?
|
I dont know, I've seen it so I dont care but maybe that should be reflected in the title? Someone might not think about that.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:41 PM
|
#30
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Fair enough, perhaps adding "spoilers for EVII" in the title would help. Otherwise there will be a lot of "you know who" comments, or have the thread will be spoiler tagged.
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 12:47 PM
|
#31
|
|
Self Imposed Exile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I dont know, I've seen it so I dont care but maybe that should be reflected in the title? Someone might not think about that.
|
If you come into a thread for a movie's sequel, and are not expecting spoilers for the first movie, you have to give back your licence to use the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Kavvy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 01:26 PM
|
#32
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy
If you come into a thread for a movie's sequel, and are not expecting spoilers for the first movie, you have to give back your licence to use the internet.
|
Have you met the internet?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 01:45 PM
|
#34
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Agreed. No more big bad spherical bases containing super-weapons. For the love of god.
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 03:14 PM
|
#35
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by underGRADFlame
Spoiler warning added to title... or should i change it to the whole saga?
 |
Why would you spoil this for me??? I haven't seen any of the other movies yet, jerk. I just want to read about episode 8 without seeing any discussion about the other movies.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 03:25 PM
|
#36
|
|
Norm!
|
They should just destroy some of the super weapons from the EU, and use those.
Lets see. How about
The Galaxy Gun
A large sex toy built by the re-encarnation of Palpatine that could fire hyperspace canon shells across the galaxy in minutes that would destroy planets.
Destroying planets not enough for you, how about this beauty the shiny Sun Crusher
This little beauty has it all, its a single man fighter that fires a resonance torpedo into the heart of a sun causing a chain reaction that would destroy an entire solar system. Coated in a crystalline armor it was completely invulnerable to anything.
For the more environmentally friendly despots out there, here comes the World Devestator. These toaster shaped beauties would eat planets on one side and poop out fighters on the other, recycle whole planets, thrill your kids with their own star fighters.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 04:55 PM
|
#37
|
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
They should just destroy some of the super weapons from the EU, and use those.
Lets see. How about
The Galaxy Gun
A large sex toy built by the re-encarnation of Palpatine that could fire hyperspace canon shells across the galaxy in minutes that would destroy planets.
Destroying planets not enough for you, how about this beauty the shiny Sun Crusher
This little beauty has it all, its a single man fighter that fires a resonance torpedo into the heart of a sun causing a chain reaction that would destroy an entire solar system. Coated in a crystalline armor it was completely invulnerable to anything.
For the more environmentally friendly despots out there, here comes the World Devestator. These toaster shaped beauties would eat planets on one side and poop out fighters on the other, recycle whole planets, thrill your kids with their own star fighters.
|
My personal favorites:
Creepiest Looking
Transforms into a giant robot voiced by Orson Welles
...
Last edited by Hack&Lube; 02-16-2016 at 04:57 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hack&Lube For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 06:58 PM
|
#38
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 06:59 PM
|
#39
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
Someone finally figured out who Snoke actually is.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-16-2016, 09:05 PM
|
#40
|
|
Self Imposed Exile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Good explanation on why Snoke may not have use of the force, duplication some of Captain's posts, but still interesting.
Quote:
As we can assume from the movie, Snoke existed during the events of Return of the Jedi. So if Snoke was a living wielder of the Force during Jedi, how would Anakin have been able to bring balance to the Force? With Snoke being able to still wield the Dark Side, the Force would not have been balanced, thus the canon would be broken.
But if Snoke was not a Force wielder but still knew how the Force worked, it would technically fulfill Anakin's destiny, and fit perfectly into the canon of the rest of the series.
|
http://moviepilot.com/posts/3784782
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 AM.
|
|
