Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-29-2020, 12:41 AM   #21
Number 39
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Number 39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oakville, ON
Exp:
Default

Nope
Number 39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 02:33 AM   #22
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Exp:
Default

I wouldn’t.

Free up that spot for friendly competition. I’d like to see a Lucic - Ryan - Gawdin line with Gawdin taking some draws.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 02:43 AM   #23
Crown Royal
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
If we do sign Hall we may need every extra dollar and cent for cap space. I think we can find a replacement 4th Line Center in the PTO bin dame was as Rieder and Rinaldo.
I think if Hall is a possibility we see Ryan dealt and the difference in salary between Ryan and Janko would be more than Janko and a replacement and we can't really afford to move on from 2 PKers in Ryan and Janko
Crown Royal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 08:39 AM   #24
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Qualifying Jankowski would be braindead, and thankfully Brad has shown he understands when not to qualify and just keep negotiating towards something more reasonable. No way you pay $1.75mil for Jankowski right now.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 08:58 AM   #25
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

As bad as he was this season I wouldn't be shocked if they do qualify him.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 09:11 AM   #26
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

They definitely shouldn't qualify him.
I don't even think they should sign him as a UFA, but if they do, it'll be fine.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 09:12 AM   #27
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
They definitely shouldn't qualify him.
I don't even think they should sign him as a UFA, but if they do, it'll be fine.
I believe he has potential still, but we can’t be waiting for both Bennett and Jankowski spending that much. If the cap space is needed, move on from him.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 09:17 AM   #28
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Yes. If they took that stance with players coming off of bad seasons they would dump 9/10ths of this roster. They also have to think about asset management and not giving away player. I think Jankowski, along with Bennett, can be used in a trade to improve the team. There are teams that will still look at untapped potential and want to roll the dice on guys like Jankowski and Bennett, so the Flames should use that to their advantage. Frankly, the quicker they move on from both of these guys the better, but they need to get something for the investment they put into those players.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2020, 10:39 AM   #29
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I don't think he's worth what his QO would be. But if I'm Mark Jankowski, I'm looking to sign a 3 year deal at whatever amount keeps me in the NHL
Geeoff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 12:57 PM   #30
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Who is giving Mark Jankowski three years of term after a seven-point season?
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 01:05 PM   #31
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Who is giving Mark Jankowski three years of term after a seven-point season?
Nobody.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 01:08 PM   #32
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Yes. If they took that stance with players coming off of bad seasons they would dump 9/10ths of this roster. They also have to think about asset management and not giving away player. I think Jankowski, along with Bennett, can be used in a trade to improve the team. There are teams that will still look at untapped potential and want to roll the dice on guys like Jankowski and Bennett, so the Flames should use that to their advantage. Frankly, the quicker they move on from both of these guys the better, but they need to get something for the investment they put into those players.
Who are those teams who think they should give anything for a 26 year old guy who will be starting his Draft plus 9 season? Especially with the cap uncertainty that the next few seasons project to bring.

Back when the Rangers got Brian Boyle for a third round pick, he was pretty cheap, and the cap was going North a fair bit ever season. Plus I think picks are considered more valuable today than they were 10 years ago. I don't think Boyle is very physical for his size, but I think he would at least bump into a turnstile if he had to....not sure Jankowski would, and at this point a Boyle like career is likely the high high ceiling for Jankowski.

So I don't know if the Flames will find another team willing to pay a third round pick for Jankowski carrying a salary number of 1.7. Maybe if the Flames eat half the salary, but than they are at a point where the retained salary plus replacment player is costing them 1.7 million to try and get back a 3rd of 4th round pick type of thing.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 01:08 PM   #33
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane
Dube-Bennett
Lucic-Ryan


If we want to improve the forward ranks we need to make room in the top 12. Barring any trades that starts with Jankowski and Reider losing their regular spots.

You definitely don’t qualify Janko. Maybe re-sign him for 1yr, at a lower cap hit, and have him for depth.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 01:22 PM   #34
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane
Dube-Bennett
Lucic-Ryan


If we want to improve the forward ranks we need to make room in the top 12. Barring any trades that starts with Jankowski and Reider losing their regular spots.

You definitely don’t qualify Janko. Maybe re-sign him for 1yr, at a lower cap hit, and have him for depth.
I personally would want this, assuming we don’t trade Gaudreau:

Hall - Monahan - Gaudreau
Tkachuk - Lindholm - Mangiapane
Bennett - Backlund - Dube
Lucic - Ryan - Gawdin
Rinaldo, Quine

Jankowski should be traded to a team that needs a bottom 6 center. I would even trade him for a mid pick, maybe a 4th turning into a 3rd based on performance.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2020, 01:52 PM   #35
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Letting Jankowski walk definitely has to be a consideration at this point.

With the possibility of signing Hall, there has to be a lot up in the air at this point though. There is likely a very dramatic set of differing possibilities for how the Flames future will look.

But yes, not qualifying our worst forward last year has to be a possibility at this point.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 01:58 PM   #36
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Canucks are probably patiently waiting to see what happens here as I imagine they will be one of the first teams to contact Jankowski's agent if he becomes a free agent. Leafs thought enough of Jankowski last offseason to take him in a Brodie for Kadri trade. He did have a bad season but I wouldn't discount that a lot of teams may be willing to give him a chance with a change of scenery.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 02:16 PM   #37
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I personally would want this, assuming we don’t trade Gaudreau:

Hall - Monahan - Gaudreau
Tkachuk - Lindholm - Mangiapane
Bennett - Backlund - Dube
Lucic - Ryan - Gawdin
Rinaldo, Quine
Love this lineup. Might be the deepest group of Flames forwards since the 80s.

The only weakness is at the #1 centre position. However, Gaudreau is also one of the best playmaking wingers in the league, and that might be the best group of #2-4 centres in the league. People also underestimate Hall's physical game. He can throw hits. That lineup has at least one solid hitter on each line.

When was the last time a franchise UFA had ties to Calgary? The organization needs to make that happen.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 02:42 PM   #38
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Canucks are probably patiently waiting to see what happens here as I imagine they will be one of the first teams to contact Jankowski's agent if he becomes a free agent. Leafs thought enough of Jankowski last offseason to take him in a Brodie for Kadri trade. He did have a bad season but I wouldn't discount that a lot of teams may be willing to give him a chance with a change of scenery.
That’s the thing. Janko has a really bad year this season but his first 2 years in the NHL were decent. 17 goals as a rookie then a 14 goal 32pt sophomore year where he played a key role in the PK.

Like Bennett you see flashes that keeps you intrigued so I doubt the team walks away but he could be a throw in for a trade. I also think he would be eager to sign a one year prove it deal with any team and come back focused.

Who knows maybe we see a different player come late July?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 02:46 PM   #39
Dan403
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

He is an asset with some value so he gets qualified.

Whether he starts the season her or not is an entirely different reason.

Might be time for a change of scenery.
Dan403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2020, 03:05 PM   #40
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

Like the guy but he won't be worth his qualifying offer. I say don't qualify, but still try and re-sign
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021