Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2020, 02:56 PM   #21
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I heard from a reliable source earlier in the year that Vatanen would have been part of the Hall trade to Calgary.

Wouldn't be completely surprised if we pursue him again.
Makes sense IMO. I always thought hed be an amazing fit with thos group.

And I see NJ as the 2and best trade partner for the Flames. They have a lot to offer.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 02:56 PM   #22
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Reminder that Martinez is not a rental. He still has another year after this season.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 02:58 PM   #23
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I heard from a reliable source earlier in the year that Vatanen would have been part of the Hall trade to Calgary.

Wouldn't be completely surprised if we pursue him again.
That would have been a massive deal. Any idea what was rumoured to be going to NJ?
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:00 PM   #24
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hyperbole Chamber
Exp:
Default

It really is D-Day.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:04 PM   #25
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Imagine trading away 2 2nd round picks and still having three left in the next two drafts.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:05 PM   #26
IamNotKenKing
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I seriously doubt Brodie is available. Nothing in the history of this team would show that they're willing to be proactive and sell. Not while the organization's top priority is still on the table (sneaking into the playoffs). Unlike the Glencross trade, moving Brodie would sink the season given that Hamonic and Giordano are weeks away from returning.

It may be short sighted, but it's how we do things.
I just cannot see any team in a playoff race trading its best, healthy defenseman. I don't see it as not being proactive, or short-sighted, but instead telling the team "we're done". I just don't see that happening.

If good news comes back on Gio or Hammer before the deadline, then I could see it, not overly likely, but could see it.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2020, 03:08 PM   #27
FlamesNation23
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FlamesNation23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really wish we would sell if this is the market and then retool in FA and draft. Unfortunately we have too many injuries so tre wont do anything and we will be in the same place next yr.
FlamesNation23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:16 PM   #28
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

Yah, when every team in a playoff position is active in adding defensemen, why would Calgary trade theirs? They won't. I suppose I understand the fear of losing Brodie and Hamonic to the market for "nothing" but, in a cap world, cap space is something. I'm okay if both those guys sign somewhere else after the season and we're left with cap space. And I'm okay if they're both re-signed. But, I'd be p'od if they were traded for draft picks while we're in the middle of a playoff race.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:16 PM   #29
Beatle17
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Imagine trading away 2 2nd round picks and still having three left in the next two drafts.
And you know why that is also right? Or is this just another shot at the GM.
Beatle17 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Beatle17 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2020, 03:18 PM   #30
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Those D injuries are reallllly dragging us down. What crappy luck.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:19 PM   #31
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

no surprise

https://twitter.com/user/status/1229893005521440771
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:20 PM   #32
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Would much rather pay 2 seconds for Martinez, who has some term left, than a second + for Scandella.

I wonder how many D buyers are left after today.
1qqaaz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:30 PM   #33
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I heard from a reliable source earlier in the year that Vatanen would have been part of the Hall trade to Calgary.
It certainly seems like they were working on a blockbuster. I’d kill to know all the details of that trade.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:37 PM   #34
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1229897627464077313
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 03:48 PM   #35
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would much rather pay 2 seconds for Martinez, who has some term left, than a second + for Scandella.

I wonder how many D buyers are left after today.
I'd be upset if the Flames made either of those moves.

If the plan is to compete with this core, at this stage, they are better off saving all of their assets and figuring it out on the UFA market.

I actually like the Flames current stance that they won't trade away significant futures for a rental.

I realize that Martinez isn't a rental, but the Flames are getting Valimaki and Giordano back at some point. Valimaki may not return this year, but he'll be back next year. Both Andersson and Kylington look able to take over a Martinez role IMO too.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2020, 03:48 PM   #36
Rando
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Imagine trading away 2 2nd round picks and still having three left in the next two drafts.
Imagine paying half a billion dollars for an NHL team and being given the best expansion rules in NHL expansion history to acquire players.
Rando is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rando For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2020, 09:13 PM   #37
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would much rather pay 2 seconds for Martinez, who has some term left, than a second + for Scandella.

I wonder how many D buyers are left after today.
After seeing some of the other returns this deal actually seems kind of reasonable.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 10:49 PM   #38
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Imagine trading away 2 2nd round picks and still having three left in the next two drafts.
It would be awful nice to be handed a team and a half worth of NHL quality depth, and not have to do any work to have an excellent team on day one. I'd be pissed if I was the former expansion teams who basically got waiver fodder to choose from.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2020, 05:24 AM   #39
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
It would be awful nice to be handed a team and a half worth of NHL quality depth, and not have to do any work to have an excellent team on day one. I'd be pissed if I was the former expansion teams who basically got waiver fodder to choose from.


It is funny that that is the prevailing view now.

At the time he was heavily criticized for not taking the best current team he could, and trading for too many futures.

In reality, he had to do a massive amount of work.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2020, 07:18 AM   #40
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
It is funny that that is the prevailing view now.

At the time he was heavily criticized for not taking the best current team he could, and trading for too many futures.

In reality, he had to do a massive amount of work.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not to mention the GM did an amazing job of drafting players that gelled together and were far more than the sum of their parts. What Vegas did was unheard of in professional sports.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021