Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2020, 11:53 AM   #41
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
The Flames have had their chances with adding elite right shooting forwards to the core in Tyler Seguin, Nathan MacKinnon and more recently Mark Stone, next up, William Nylander, Brayden Point, Patrik Laine and Travis Konecny.


Come again? I feel like there is a joke here that I am missing..?
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2020, 01:29 PM   #42
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
I remember before the 2014 draft lottery, a lot of write-ups had the Flames taking the right shooting Sam Reinhart or right shooting William Nylander and most were quite content with that.
Well, the Flames never had a shot at Reinhart - he went second. Can you imagine the commotion if he'd gone to Nylander instead of Bennett, who was number one ranked NA skater as late as April? Nylander wasn't even the top ranked Euro skater - he was behind Kapanen. That year there was Ekblad and the 3 centres.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
The Flames have had their chances with adding elite right shooting forwards to the core in Tyler Seguin, Nathan MacKinnon and more recently Mark Stone, next up, William Nylander, Brayden Point, Patrik Laine and Travis Konecny.
I'm not sure how you suggest the Flames had a shot at Mackinnon, Seguin, or Laine. Treliving tried to get Stone but wouldn't sell the farm (and Vegas isn't exactly lighting it up since he got there). Nylander - see above. Point was a guy everyone passed on twice. You should also include every other later RHS draft pick who blossomed, from Pasternak to Arvidsson to Labanc
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2020, 02:53 PM   #43
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Icon45

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Well, the Flames never had a shot at Reinhart - he went second. Can you imagine the commotion if he'd gone to Nylander instead of Bennett, who was number one ranked NA skater as late as April? Nylander wasn't even the top ranked Euro skater - he was behind Kapanen. That year there was Ekblad and the 3 centres.



I'm not sure how you suggest the Flames had a shot at Mackinnon, Seguin, or Laine. Treliving tried to get Stone but wouldn't sell the farm (and Vegas isn't exactly lighting it up since he got there). Nylander - see above. Point was a guy everyone passed on twice. You should also include every other later RHS draft pick who blossomed, from Pasternak to Arvidsson to Labanc
Feaster allegedly offered all of their picks in that draft to get Makinnon.

We almost landed Seguin from Boston but didnt want to part with the 1st rounder + +.

Hes not wrong.

Laine I dont recall anything about CGY trying to trade up. In fact I think they were locked and set on Juolevi. Tkachuk was the happiest of accidents.

Last edited by dammage79; 01-20-2020 at 02:56 PM.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2020, 03:02 PM   #44
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Feaster allegedly offered all of their picks in that draft to get Makinnon.

We almost landed Seguin from Boston but didnt want to part with the 1st rounder + +.

Hes not wrong.

Laine I dont recall anything about CGY trying to trade up. In fact I think they were locked and set on Juolevi. Tkachuk was the happiest of accidents.
I find the Seguin one hard to believe, since the trade that happened was so different. The Mackinnon one is silly because that's not being close to getting Mackinnon, it's making an offer that anyone would know wasn't going to be accepted, since, as was said, Mackinnon was the best prospect in years.

At the end of the day, I don't consider those to be the Flames "having their chance" since it wasn't going to happen. Plus, the OP was about Treliving anyway, and all of these except for Laine predate Treliving.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2020, 03:19 PM   #45
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Look, if you guys aren't going to start taking this BOD thread seriously, I'm of the opinion that we should just wrap this thing up.
__________________
"We don't even know who our best player is yet. It could be any one of us at this point." - Peter LaFleur, player/coach, Average Joe's Gymnasium
Harry Lime is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2020, 04:30 PM   #46
David Struch
First Line Centre
 
David Struch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Here's one mock pre-draft lottery that had Flames with Reinhart, there were also others...

1. Aaron Ekblad
2. Leon Draisaitl
3. Sam Bennett
4. Sam Reinhart

https://puckprose.com/2014/06/22/201...hl-mock-draft/

Last edited by David Struch; 01-20-2020 at 04:34 PM.
David Struch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2020, 04:45 PM   #47
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
Here's one mock pre-draft lottery that had Flames with Reinhart, there were also others...

1. Aaron Ekblad
2. Leon Draisaitl
3. Sam Bennett
4. Sam Reinhart

https://puckprose.com/2014/06/22/201...hl-mock-draft/
What am I missing here?
VilleN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VilleN For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2020, 06:18 PM   #48
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
Here's one mock pre-draft lottery that had Flames with Reinhart, there were also others...

1. Aaron Ekblad
2. Leon Draisaitl
3. Sam Bennett
4. Sam Reinhart

https://puckprose.com/2014/06/22/201...hl-mock-draft/
You realize because Calgary picked 4th they didn’t really get to choose Reinhart. They totally would have - he’s a legacy Flame.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2020, 10:40 AM   #49
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Feaster allegedly offered all of their picks in that draft to get Makinnon.

We almost landed Seguin from Boston but didnt want to part with the 1st rounder + +.

Hes not wrong.

Laine I dont recall anything about CGY trying to trade up. In fact I think they were locked and set on Juolevi. Tkachuk was the happiest of accidents.


We were in on Seguin, but it wasn’t “adding him to the core”. It was giving up our core for Seguin. The rumored deal was Gaudreau (still a prospect at the time) and our first (turned into Monahan).
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021