10-16-2020, 03:51 PM
|
#121
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
Asked Andrew Mangiapane if a longer term contract was discussed prior to signing a two-year deal with Calgary.
Says he’d have been open to it, but team’s tight cap situation essentially dictated a shorter term from the start. #Flames
|
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
AC,
agulati,
cam_wmh,
CF84,
Cycling76er,
Dion,
FanIn80,
FlamesAreOne,
ForeverFlameFan,
Gaudreau is a Ninja,
GioforPM,
OldSam,
SnipeShow,
Stillman16,
Superfraggle
|
10-16-2020, 04:01 PM
|
#122
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I think signing Mang for two years is as big a screw up as signing Tkachuk to a bridge deal was (different scale though). Brutal contract management in the bottom six has caused the team a cap crunch today, and will cause cap issues going forward.
|
Tkachuk scored 61 points last season and has 3 goals and 2 assists in 15 playff games.
If he evens out to 60 point player instead of an 80 point player, which at this point seems like a very realistic possibility, we'll be quite happy in 2022 that Tkachuk isn't getting paid like he can score a point per game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Tkachuk is going to see a huge increase after his deal is up, and he will have all the leverage.
|
See above. I think there's a good chance the increase isn't going to be what it looked like in 2019.
Quote:
Mangiapane looks like he will be in the same boat.
|
Huge maybe. His current season record is 32 points and less than 0.5 PPG. Throwing either term or money at guys this early in their NHL careers is a bad idea.
The reason Mangiapane looks so good is because his tenacity stands out among our top 6. This is not a knock on Mangiapane, but I feel like people have been kind of blinded by relatively low expectations and the contrast which doesn't flatter most of our other guys.
Quote:
Gaudreau's contract comes up. Giordano's contract comes up. Monahan's the year after. Those are all very important deals on core players. The core is not locked-up long term. Treliving is going to have to navigate the next off-seasons incredibly carefully.
|
While true, two years is a lot of time. Gaudreau might not be here. Giordano might not be here.
BTW, Monahan was a 50 point player last season and 4th in TOI/G among forwards, which is not good for a 1st line center. His real claim to fame was being a guy who could put the puck in the net when given the slightest opportunity, but the last we saw that Moneyhands guy was before the 2019 all-star break.
To my eyes it looks like Monahans magic scoring hands are pretty much gone with his injuries, and they've now been gone so long that I wouldn't bet on them coming back. If my guess is right, he'll be lucky to get a raise at all.
To put it bluntly, lately our top players haven't looked like we need to worry about finding cap space for them in two years, as they've been the reason we've been getting crap results.
Last edited by Itse; 10-16-2020 at 04:03 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 04:27 PM
|
#123
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Tkachuk scored 61 points last season and has 3 goals and 2 assists in 15 playff games.
If he evens out to 60 point player instead of an 80 point player, which at this point seems like a very realistic possibility, we'll be quite happy in 2022 that Tkachuk isn't getting paid like he can score a point per game.
See above. I think there's a good chance the increase isn't going to be what it looked like in 2019.
|
Despite a team-wide down season, Tkachuk still followed up his 78-point season with a season in which he led the team in scoring and was on pace for 72 points despite facing the toughest competition every night.
Betting on him to be a 60 point player is quite the interesting, likely bad bet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Huge maybe. His current season record is 32 points and less than 0.5 PPG. Throwing either term or money at guys this early in their NHL careers is a bad idea.
The reason Mangiapane looks so good is because his tenacity stands out among our top 6. This is not a knock on Mangiapane, but I feel like people have been kind of blinded by relatively low expectations and the contrast which doesn't flatter most of our other guys.
|
The reason Mangiapane looks so good is because he is so good. His rates put him among the very elite 2nd liners in the NHL already and he's likely to get better.
Even at his current 5v5 production, his contract is an absolute steal.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:02 PM
|
#124
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Just under $4M left for Kylington plus UFA/PDO/deadline deals/trades.
|
need 3 more D counting Kylington to make 8
Mackey $925
Petrovic $700
Kylington 700
and 4 more 700K forwards to make 14 and that leaves them over by 500K
Somebody needs to get hurt or moved.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:05 PM
|
#125
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
need 3 more D counting Kylington to make 8
Mackey $925
Petrovic $700
Kylington 700
and 4 more 700K forwards to make 14 and that leaves them over by 500K
Somebody needs to get hurt or moved.
|
Don't need 8 necessarily.
I fully expect the Flames to make more moves, but they could roll into the season with 13 forwards, 7 defenseman and 2 goalies for a roster of 22 to be cap compliant.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AustinL_NHL For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:05 PM
|
#126
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
The Flames now have about $3.29M with Gawdin and the 10 forwards listed by CapFriendly. They need to re-sign Kylington and add a forward. That forward could be a prospect or an acquisition. I'd also like to see them acquire a quality RHD for the 3rd pairing.
Personally, I think if Kylington wants to play for the Flames, he will sign for league minimum ($700K) like Gawdin.
So, that would leave the Flames with about $2.59M for the final forward and another RHD. If the Flames are smart, they could potentially get some pretty good pieces with what people have been signing for.
|
You need more then 12 forwards and 6 D-men... You need to plan on a few guys getting sick hit by the puck in the warm up.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:14 PM
|
#127
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
need 3 more D counting Kylington to make 8
Mackey $925
Petrovic $700
Kylington 700
and 4 more 700K forwards to make 14 and that leaves them over by 500K
Somebody needs to get hurt or moved.
|
You only have a 23-man roster. 8 D+14 F+2 G… looks like someone can't count.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:39 PM
|
#128
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
You only have a 23-man roster. 8 D+14 F+2 G… looks like someone can't count.
|
And I think they will start with 22 to bank cap space.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:43 PM
|
#129
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Tkachuk scored 61 points last season and has 3 goals and 2 assists in 15 playff games.
If he evens out to 60 point player instead of an 80 point player, which at this point seems like a very realistic possibility, we'll be quite happy in 2022 that Tkachuk isn't getting paid like he can score a point per game.
|
Tkachuk gets a QO of 9M. He will be getting paid at though he is a ppg player regardless of his scoring over the next 2 years.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:46 PM
|
#130
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Tkachuk gets a QO of 9M. He will be getting paid at though he is a ppg player regardless of his scoring over the next 2 years.
|
This is true.
Tkachuk will write his own ticket pretty much, because if he doesn't like what's being offered he can just take the QO and go UFA 1 off season later.
This is very much why Josh Anderson just got that massive deal from the Habs. They had to give him basically whatever he wanted or he was gone for nothing in one season.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 05:46 PM
|
#131
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
You need more then 12 forwards and 6 D-men... You need to plan on a few guys getting sick hit by the puck in the warm up.
|
Wut
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 06:06 PM
|
#132
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
Despite a team-wide down season, Tkachuk still followed up his 78-point season with a season in which he led the team in scoring and was on pace for 72 points despite facing the toughest competition every night.
Betting on him to be a 60 point player is quite the interesting, likely bad bet.
The reason Mangiapane looks so good is because he is so good. His rates put him among the very elite 2nd liners in the NHL already and he's likely to get better.
Even at his current 5v5 production, his contract is an absolute steal.
|
He is a really good player on a good contract but his .47 ppg puts him in 187 spot among NHL forwards with more than 40 games ...
The first 93 players are #1 line players the second 93 94-186 and Magniapane is the #1 3rd line scorer by ppg in whole league.
Backlund at .64 ppg sits at #107 and could be considered among the elite 2nd liners.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 06:27 PM
|
#133
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
He is a really good player on a good contract but his .47 ppg puts him in 187 spot among NHL forwards with more than 40 games ...
The first 93 players are #1 line players the second 93 94-186 and Magniapane is the #1 3rd line scorer by ppg in whole league.
Backlund at .64 ppg sits at #107 and could be considered among the elite 2nd liners.
|
Last season, Mangiapane played 861:18 at 5v5, which ranked 116th among NHL forwards.
In those minutes, Mangiapane:
- scored 15 goals (tied for 43rd among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- scored at a rate of 1.04 goals per 60 minutes (ties for 54th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- had 11 primary assists (tied for 71st among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- recorded primary assists at a rate of 0.77 per 60 minutes (tied for 83rd among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- had 29 total points (tied for 77th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- recorded points at a rate of 2.02 per 60 minutes (tied for 86th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
All despite playing against elite competition night in and night out on the shutdown line.
By all accounts, Mangiapane produced like a first liner offensively 5v5 last season.
By all accounts, Mangiapane was also a beast defensively with incredible possession + scoring chance rates.
Last edited by AustinL_NHL; 10-16-2020 at 06:35 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to AustinL_NHL For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 06:29 PM
|
#134
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
Despite a team-wide down season, Tkachuk still followed up his 78-point season with a season in which he led the team in scoring and was on pace for 72 points despite facing the toughest competition every night.
Betting on him to be a 60 point player is quite the interesting, likely bad bet.
|
For the record, I think Tkachuk is probably going to be something like a 70 point player.
My point was more that it's not yet clear what Tkachuk is, or what Mangiapane is, and even though it puts me in the minority, I will rather take the risk that comes with a bridge deal.
|
|
|
10-16-2020, 07:02 PM
|
#136
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-16-2020, 07:33 PM
|
#137
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Best they could do under the circumstances. Shame... this was the opportunity to sign a guy longterm for way less then he'll be worth but they pissed away cap space on stupid stuff so now they can't buy the smart stuff.
|
|
|
10-17-2020, 03:49 AM
|
#138
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Best they could do under the circumstances. Shame... this was the opportunity to sign a guy longterm for way less then he'll be worth but they pissed away cap space on stupid stuff so now they can't buy the smart stuff.
|
Two camps have to agree to these terms.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-17-2020, 05:49 AM
|
#139
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
|
Longer term would have been great. I love Mangiapane. Was at the dome for his hat trick and he's now in my good books for life. So fun to root for.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Futzee For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-17-2020, 11:17 AM
|
#140
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
Last season, Mangiapane played 861:18 at 5v5, which ranked 116th among NHL forwards.
In those minutes, Mangiapane:
- scored 15 goals (tied for 43rd among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- scored at a rate of 1.04 goals per 60 minutes (ties for 54th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- had 11 primary assists (tied for 71st among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- recorded primary assists at a rate of 0.77 per 60 minutes (tied for 83rd among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- had 29 total points (tied for 77th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
- recorded points at a rate of 2.02 per 60 minutes (tied for 86th among all NHL forwards - 1st line production)
All despite playing against elite competition night in and night out on the shutdown line.
By all accounts, Mangiapane produced like a first liner offensively 5v5 last season.
By all accounts, Mangiapane was also a beast defensively with incredible possession + scoring chance rates.
|
I mean... He did play the season on our actual first line
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaydee For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:32 AM.
|
|