10-22-2020, 02:07 PM
|
#3721
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Ryan+ Hanifin+ Pelletier +1st 2021 for Toews (40% retained)
Hanifin+Pelletier form the value for Toews, 1st 2021 for the retention, ryan for salary purposes.
Gives us this roster with ~1.5 million to sign the 6th RD. This would be an "all in" move in hopes we're cup hunting over the next two seasons.
|
or something like Hanifin+Ritich+1st for Toews (~40% retained) + Subban
__________________
In Treliving We Trust!
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:21 PM
|
#3722
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Hanifin
2021 1st (top 3 protected, goes to 2022 1st if we in fact pick top 3)
Rittich
Cond. 2022 2nd/3rd (2nd if Calgary makes it to the Conf. Finals in either year of 2021 or 2022)
For
Toews @33.33% retention (3.5m, —> 7,000,000 x 3 years)
Subban
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:29 PM
|
#3723
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
I think both of those leave us too close to the cap.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:32 PM
|
#3724
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Paradise Island, Bahamas
|
How does a team do a rebuild if they are paying players so much to play for other teams?
A rebuild needs draft choices and cap space.
Chicago would be foolish to pay such a high percentage of Toews or Kane's salary.
I realize this may mean they can't trade them but as they are still effective players so that is not a tragedy.
If I am Chicago GM I wouldn't retain more than 10%
Last edited by N26; 10-22-2020 at 02:39 PM.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:35 PM
|
#3725
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
I think both of those leave us too close to the cap.
|
Retaining Toews at 1/3 allows us to offset the cap differences.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:40 PM
|
#3726
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Retaining Toews at 1/3 allows us to offset the cap differences.
|
Im the one who did the posted capfriendly mix.
Subbing Rittich out for ryan in the trade gives you ~900k less room to work with, then you retained a bit less on toews, ~800k, which would give you only 100k and you'd still need a 6th RD.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:45 PM
|
#3727
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Back in Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N26
How does a team do a rebuild if they are paying players so much to play for other teams?
A rebuild needs draft choices and cap space.
Chicago would be foolish to pay such a high percentage of Toews or Kane's salary.
I realize this may mean they can't trade them but as they are still effective players so that is not a tragedy.
If I am Chicago GM I wouldn't retain more than 10%
|
But the more you retain the better the picks/prospects are, and in this offseason without retaining you won't have any suitor.
They likely wouldn't spend to the cap in the next two years anyway in a rebuild with cheaper young players.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 02:45 PM
|
#3728
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N26
How does a team do a rebuild if they are paying players so much to play for other teams?
A rebuild needs draft choices and cap space.
Chicago would be foolish to pay such a high percentage of Toews or Kane's salary.
I realize this may mean they can't trade them but as they are still effective players so that is not a tragedy.
If I am Chicago GM I wouldn't retain more than 10%
|
I don't see why a rebuilding team would need cap space. Typically rebuilding teams can take on cap space in exchange for picks/prospects. Ideally, if you're rebuilding you should have a good portion of players on ELCs and bridge contracts.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurwamac
you should look in the mirror and worry about yourself.. you fight for scraps in Canada - I've got it made keep tap dancing for a bunch of guys son - I've got it good where it counts boy
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VilleN For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-22-2020, 03:05 PM
|
#3729
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
IMO no need to devalue the pick by lotto protecting it. We're not going to the lotto with toews augmenting our forward core.
|
Sounds like something Doug Wilson might have said when he acquired Karlsson.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
Its a small ask but I'd rather see them try and address the 6D so that Kylington isn't on that pair with Valimaki. I'd rather a capable veteran playing with Kylington as the 7D with spot duty
|
I like these pairings the best in a vacuum:
Hanifin-Andersson
Valimaki-Tanev
Gio-Kylington
Gio averages 5:20/game on both PP and PK; dropping his EV time wouldn't be the end of the world (and you probably throw him an extra shift with Tanev now and then).
Flames had pretty even time at EV for their top 5 d-men last year:
Gio 18:28
Hanifin 18:12
Brodie 18:10 (Andersson)
Hamonic 18:00 (Tanev)
Andersson 17:44 (Valimaki...drop it to ~16)
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to powderjunkie For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-22-2020, 03:10 PM
|
#3730
|
Franchise Player
|
I think it's possible that if Hamonic decides to play this year, he could still join the Flames on a PTO. Could be a nice fit with Valimaki
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 03:17 PM
|
#3731
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
I was also hard on the train, if you were conducting I shoveled the coal...
|
Well if Jiri is conducting and you are stoking coal, then I was the hobo hitching a ride on one of the boxcars.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-22-2020, 03:26 PM
|
#3732
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnhitbox
Yes, the top line has not been addressed, but I think they had a bad year and will rebound somewhat.
It wasn't just a tough year. If you look at anything past mid December 2018, you saw the regression start and, BT decided to pick up Oscar Fantenberg. Now let's move on to the mess of a 2019-2020 season. The regression continued with the first line, and BT once again went out and picked up another pair of defenseman in, Erick Gustafsson and Brandon Davidson. Maybe the top line hit a peak, and have come back down to earth?
I agree with all the other points that you make.
Sent from my SM-N986W using Tapatalk
|
Perhaps, but where does the line fall between their peak and the scorched earth?
In 2018–19 Gaudreau, Monahan and Lindholm combined for 97 goals and 259 points. That dropped the following year to 69 (-28) and 160 (-99!). I think the smart money has them producing together somewhere closer to the middle between these figures, @ around 80 goals and 210 points.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 03:31 PM
|
#3733
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
I think it's possible that if Hamonic decides to play this year, he could still join the Flames on a PTO. Could be a nice fit with Valimaki
|
No Hamonic. Especially pairing him with Valimaki. Look at Hanifins growth with Hamonic.
He’s a great person and a warrior, but I never want to see him in a Flames jersey again.
|
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:
|
18YrOldSamBennett,
442scotty,
BigErnSalute_16,
Calgary4LIfe,
dammage79,
Da_Chief,
dissentowner,
FlamesFanInEdmonton,
FlamesNation23,
jaikorven,
Johnhitbox,
Monahammer,
Poe969,
Roof-Daddy,
Sandman
|
10-22-2020, 03:53 PM
|
#3734
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Thanks for reminding me that we could have had Dobson AND Valimaki on the bottom pairing.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:21 PM
|
#3735
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Steinberg thinks it is 60-40 that Monahan is traded next year. He thinks Monahan was in the Andersen deal. To be clear PURE SPECULATION on his part.
Pat has been all over the Lindholm to center bandwagon for months.
What top line RW could the Flames get for Monahan?
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:31 PM
|
#3736
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Steinberg thinks it is 60-40 that Monahan is traded next year. He thinks Monahan was in the Andersen deal. To be clear PURE SPECULATION on his part.
Pat has been all over the Lindholm to center bandwagon for months.
What top line RW could the Flames get for Monahan?
|
Gross AF
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:33 PM
|
#3737
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Steinberg thinks it is 60-40 that Monahan is traded next year. He thinks Monahan was in the Andersen deal. To be clear PURE SPECULATION on his part.
Pat has been all over the Lindholm to center bandwagon for months.
What top line RW could the Flames get for Monahan?
|
What Andersen deal? For Freddie? Please tell me we weren’t bandying Sean Monahan for Josh.
__________________
Mom and Dad love you, Rowan - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:34 PM
|
#3738
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Gross AF
|
Who knows if it is true. Pat was definitely saying it was his speculation from Friedman saying it would have been a big deal. Makes me think a lot more parts would have been involved. Likely one of their goalies. It probably fell apart when they knew Markstrom was hitting the market (that’s my speculation)
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:35 PM
|
#3739
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Steinberg thinks it is 60-40 that Monahan is traded next year. He thinks Monahan was in the Andersen deal. To be clear PURE SPECULATION on his part.
Pat has been all over the Lindholm to center bandwagon for months.
What top line RW could the Flames get for Monahan?
|
I know it probably wouldn’t be an immediate improvement but what about just trading to acquire a couple RH shot youngsters who have good potential?
How much fun would Monahan for Cozens and Thompson be?
Let Cozens play with Backlund like many rookies have before him and learn how to play C from a good pro. Thompson could be a RHed version of Lucic with Bennett and Dube. Our 3 best forwards on the top line.
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Tkachuk
Mangiapane-Backlund-Cozens
Dube-Bennett-Thompson
Lucic-Ryan-Simon/Nordstrom
Would probably be viewed as a step back so not gonna happen and Buffalo might not be interested in trading either youngster.
Hall-Eichel-Olofsson
Skinner-Monahan-Reinhart
Eakin-Staal-Okposo
Rieder-Girgensons-Lazar
Last edited by SeanCharles; 10-22-2020 at 04:50 PM.
|
|
|
10-22-2020, 04:39 PM
|
#3740
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
What Andersen deal? For Freddie? Please tell me we weren’t bandying Sean Monahan for Josh.
|
All we know is that Treliving was right in the mix for Josh Anderson. Steinburg is speculating that Monahan was the key player in the deal on the basis of what Anderson eventually returned from Montreal. I personally think it is nonsense, and as intrigued as I am about Lindholm playing at centre I don't believe he provides an improvement over Monahan.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 AM.
|
|