Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2020, 07:39 PM   #101
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
If you are exposing him, you might as well trade him at the deadline because he gets taken 100%.

Gives the team legitimacy and they'll be looking to make an impact just like Vegas did in their first year and what a player to add for the next few years.
Depends on who else is available including from other teams.
They will want a combination of youth and experience.
If the Flames expose Sam or Kylington, I could see them easily taking one of them over Gio.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2020, 07:58 PM   #102
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Depends on who else is available including from other teams.
They will want a combination of youth and experience.
If the Flames expose Sam or Kylington, I could see them easily taking one of them over Gio.
In my opinion Gio would be worth more to them for even currency for trade. He’s worth at least a first round at the deadline if not more for a team pushing to win a cup.

Can’t say that Bennett or Kyllington is worth that.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 08:04 PM   #103
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
Sentimentality aside, there is no good reason to use an expansion slot on a 38 year old signed for one year.

The fact that he has more trade value than others you would protect is a very good reason.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 08:30 PM   #104
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Depends on who else is available including from other teams.
They will want a combination of youth and experience.
If the Flames expose Sam or Kylington, I could see them easily taking one of them over Gio.
I don't see any way the Flames can protect either of Bennett or Kylington and I think it's pretty likely Flames will have to expose a better asset than either of them.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 08:32 PM   #105
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
I don't see any way the Flames can protect either of Bennett or Kylington and I think it's pretty likely Flames will have to expose a better asset than either of them.
Why would they have to expose a better asset?

Literally that is who is their at this point. They'd be crazy to sign anyone to a NMC this offseason. Tre is preparing.

Even if we sign Hall, I feel like Gaudreau is gone after next season before the expansion draft for assets that aren't needed to be protected.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 08:35 PM   #106
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Why would they have to expose a better asset?

Literally that is who is their at this point. They'd be crazy to sign anyone to a NMC this offseason. Tre is preparing.

Even if we sign Hall, I feel like Gaudreau is gone after next season before the expansion draft for assets that aren't needed to be protected.
If the Flames don't re-sign Brodie or Hamonic or replace them with anyone worthwhile and don't add to the forward core at all, then they can keep everyone and also be in the draft lottery next year.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2020, 09:04 PM   #107
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
If the Flames don't re-sign Brodie or Hamonic or replace them with anyone worthwhile and don't add to the forward core at all, then they can keep everyone and also be in the draft lottery next year.
Replace Brodie or resign, but don't give a NMC to them. One of Brodie/Hamonic/Gustafsson/Forbot.

Or one of the many other UFA's that will have a hard time finding work because the cap is not going up.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 09:10 PM   #108
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm all for Sami Vatanen. I think an all Finn pair of D men in Valimaki/Vatanen would be awesome.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2020, 09:12 PM   #109
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I'm all for Sami Vatanen. I think an all Finn pair of D men in Valimaki/Vatanen would be awesome.
Is he headed to UFA?

He got traded to Carolina when they loaded up with like 8 top 4 D men didn't he?

He also reminds me of Gustafson. Very talented D man on a stacked team (Anahiem). But he is injury prone.

I hope we fill that number 4 spot with an offensive specialist like Vatanen or Gustafsson.

Last edited by MrMike; 07-30-2020 at 09:14 PM.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2020, 08:30 AM   #110
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Replace Brodie or resign, but don't give a NMC to them. One of Brodie/Hamonic/Gustafsson/Forbot.

Or one of the many other UFA's that will have a hard time finding work because the cap is not going up.
Okay but if the Flames re-sign and expose TJ Brodie, that's definitely a better asset than Bennett or Kylington.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2020, 09:45 AM   #111
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

I don't mind Sami Vatanen as a player, but he's extremely injury prone. Durability problems tend to only get worse with age.
If he was to be signed, it would be on a contract that assumes he plays 50-60 games per year.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2020, 12:50 PM   #112
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_H8_Crawford View Post
If the Flames ask Lucic to waive for expansion, does that waive the NMC completely?

If so, that's a big reason for him NOT to waive... so he doesn't get his useless ass sent to ECHL

The NMCs are basically as situation specific as the player wants them to be..



So Lucic would agree to waive his NMC for Seattle in the expansion draft, allowing him to be left unprotected for the draft, but not necessarily for a trade afterwards (as unlikely a scenario as that would be).



Similar to players giving a list of teams they'd accept a trade to. Or Iginla basically limiting his NMC to Pittsburgh at the last minute when the two offers were on the table. Scott Hartnell put a time limit on his ('I'll agree to waive to go to these teams before training camp'. No deal was made in time, so he withdrew his waiver).
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2020, 03:18 PM   #113
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Mangiapane
Dube
Bennett

Andersson
Hanifin
Kylington

Rittich

I love Gio and Backlund but they are getting older and have big cap hits.

I expect a lot of backlash from Bennett/Kylington doubters - which is fair.

I expect to have a different list by the time the draft is happening. Hopefully Tre is active this offseason.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2020, 04:03 PM   #114
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

If you trade Kylington, you're not getting much in return. Maybe a 3rd
If you trade Gio, especially at the 2022 trade deadline to a contender, you likely get a 1st
that is why I'd protect Gio
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2020, 07:27 PM   #115
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
If you trade Gio, especially at the 2022 trade deadline to a contender, you likely get a 1st
that is why I'd protect Gio
With that logic, better off to trade him a year sooner for guys you don't need to protect anyway (and/or more picks)

I love Gio, but the more I think of it there's no way the Flames should be wasting a protection on him for the expansion draft, vs what they could gain.

Expansion drafts should be asset management, not sentiment management.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021