Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2019, 07:40 AM   #41
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

Thanks, getbak. We didn't have to wait long for someone to come explain the obvious difference between the two leagues. Apples and oranges.

Funny how the Leafs fan is the one arguing for arbitrarily raising the salary cap. Go figure.
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2019, 08:03 AM   #42
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Shouldn't it be settled by Thursday so that teams know what they're working with going into the Draft?
You would think so but both Friedman and McKenzie said the number would be official on the weekend.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2019, 08:48 AM   #43
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
You look at what the other 3 top leagues pays their stars.

https://howmuch.net/articles/sports-leagues-by-revenue

This is from 2016 but still the NHL is in the same ballpark as the NBA.

Ibaka makes 22 million a season. There are countless guys like this in the NBA who are good but making salary like that.

Hockey stars are realizing they deserve to get paid. Should McDavid be the top paid player in the NHL but be paid half of what a played of Serge Ibaka makes in the NBA?

Doesn't seem right to me. Someone is taking home a nice big piece of the pie and it ain't the players.

The revenue is the revenue, and saying that the owners don't deserve a big piece of the pie to you know, run their teams is silly.


the players are getting, about half of the total revenue, there's no more money to give.


some of the owners it seems are sliding into the ludicris dollars area on contracts again.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2019, 08:48 AM   #44
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

The NBA also has a soft cap which I believe increases available revenue and helps keep smaller teams afloat.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2019, 08:49 AM   #45
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
The NBA also has a soft cap which I believe increases available revenue and helps keep smaller teams afloat.

And leads to tiered competitiveness.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2019, 09:32 AM   #46
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
How many teams are considered in "cap trouble" this off season?

Half the league? The cap is too low.
The only thing you do by raising the cap is increase escrow and competitive imbalance. Half the league will still spend to the new cap, but without an increase in revenues, it's all going to get clawed back from the players.

Last edited by Resolute 14; 06-19-2019 at 09:35 AM.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2019, 09:43 AM   #47
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
Doesn't seem right to me. Someone is taking home a nice big piece of the pie and it ain't the players.
The problem is that you don't understand that the pies are different sizes. Both the NHL and the NBA share revenue 50-50 between players and teams.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 01:45 PM   #48
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

News Update

AP reporting that the cap will be between $81.5 and $82 million

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...t-projections/
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 01:59 PM   #49
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Love it.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:01 PM   #50
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:03 PM   #51
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Seems to be a lot of complaining about the salary cap this season...

Suddenly these fans are all so mad at a hard cap, and think a soft cap with revenue sharing is the right solution...

A lot of the complaining seems to be coming from fans in the GTA...

Wonder why it’s such an issue all of a sudden?
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 02:03 PM   #52
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

The Flames will have just over 13 Mil to split between two goalies, Mangiapane,Bennett and Tkachuk. Not impossible, but very tight. I think that it is a forgone conclusion that Brodie will be traded.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:04 PM   #53
Murph
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Murph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
And leads to tiered competitiveness.
How do you figure?

Market size rank for the 4 teams in this year’s conference finals...

Toronto - 6
Golden State - 11
Portland - 22
Milwaukee - 27
Murph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:06 PM   #54
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

As much as I'd love the extra cap space I really want to see teams that are right up against it squirm this summer
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:09 PM   #55
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

I know the Flames are not the TIGHTEST team to the cap, but this has to be bad news for the Flames too. A) Lots to sign, and B) less trade options for Brodie/Stone/Neal/Frolik.
Incogneto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:13 PM   #56
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Players should sign a contract = % of cap.

Example:

Johnny - 8% of cap. If cap goes up to $100m, Johnny makes $8m. If cap goes down to $50m, Johnny makes $4m.

Not sure why this wouldn't work.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 02:14 PM   #57
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Players should sign a contract = % of cap.

Example:

Johnny - 8% of cap. If cap goes up to $100m, Johnny makes $8m. If cap goes down to $50m, Johnny makes $4m.

Not sure why this wouldn't work.
Cool idea! ... how would they ever make that transition, though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 02:14 PM   #58
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incogneto View Post
I know the Flames are not the TIGHTEST team to the cap, but this has to be bad news for the Flames too. A) Lots to sign, and B) less trade options for Brodie/Stone/Neal/Frolik.

I would think that this makes Brodie more appealing then fishing for a UFA D man. His 4.65M contract is reasonable for what you get in return. True for the other guys though.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 03:04 PM   #59
Brick
#1 Goaltender
 
Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
I would think that this makes Brodie more appealing then fishing for a UFA D man. His 4.65M contract is reasonable for what you get in return. True for the other guys though.
Teams may prefer players that are signed for more than one year.

It gives them cost certainty.
Brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 03:07 PM   #60
Stillman16
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius View Post
Cool idea! ... how would they ever make that transition, though.
Not too hard, can grandfather, work out the cap percentage and it goes to that, use the cap percentage it was at time of signing...just have to agree with NHLPA.

The hard part, IMO, would be getting the NHLPA to agree, since they are increasingly signing contracts that are signing bonus heavy. How would that work with this model???

But it would make understanding the amount of cap available, and what players would fit easier to figure out come trade deadline...
Stillman16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021