Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2019, 09:26 AM   #21
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Alberta Liberal Party (LIB)
69%

Alberta New Democratic Party (NDP)
69%

Alberta Party (AP)
64%

United Conservative Party (UCP)
45%

Freedom Conservative Party of Alberta (FCP)
27%

Alberta Advantage Party (AAP)
Did not participate

Green Party of Alberta (GRN)
Did not participate
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:26 AM   #22
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Freedom Party of Alberta?! Who’s been screwing with this thing?(if you answer “I don’t know” for every question this is the party you get aligned with)

In all seriousness some of these questions can’t be accurately answered with the options available. Ex: Environmental issues should be solved by industry, not government. IMO they should be solved by industry, the problem is that historically industry hasn’t always done so willingly. It’s like asking “should employers improve labour standards for their employees?”. Of course they should, but history has proven that more often than not it doesn’t happen naturally.
iggy_oi is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to iggy_oi For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:27 AM   #23
Regorium
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snootchiebootchies View Post
Yeah, the questions are too vague. For example, I agree with the carbon tax but it needs some serious modifications. The carbon tax needs to actually promote behaviour change. Taxing natural gas for home heating when there is no real feasible alternative available that is less carbon-intensive than natural gas smacks of a cash grab.
This defeats the point of the carbon tax. It's supposed to hit your pocketbook. You are supposed to turn down the heat and put on a sweater rather than emit carbon, or buy a higher efficiency furnace.

You're supposed to consider public transit or carpooling rather than a 40 minute solo commute.

If it doesn't hurt, then it actually doesn't promote any behaviour change.
Regorium is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:27 AM   #24
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snootchiebootchies View Post
Yeah, the questions are too vague. For example, I agree with the carbon tax but it needs some serious modifications. The carbon tax needs to actually promote behaviour change. Taxing natural gas for home heating when there is no real feasible alternative available that is less carbon-intensive than natural gas smacks of a cash grab.
Y’all realise there are “neutral” and/or “I don’t know” answers right?

It also lets you look through each issue individually at the end and see where each party falls in it. For carbon tax I picked a non-answer as I know it’s required but I like the Federal version better than Alberta’s.
PepsiFree is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:29 AM   #25
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerplunk View Post
Apparently I mostly agree with the Alberta Party, while being closest on the grid to UCP.
This was my result also. There were a couple questions I was kind of mixed and I think that if I picked my other answer there I was more in line with the UCP (hope my usual sparring partners are sitting down!)
Slava is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:29 AM   #26
snootchiebootchies
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium View Post
This defeats the point of the carbon tax. It's supposed to hit your pocketbook. You are supposed to turn down the heat and put on a sweater rather than emit carbon, or buy a higher efficiency furnace.

You're supposed to consider public transit or carpooling rather than a 40 minute solo commute.

If it doesn't hurt, then it actually doesn't promote any behaviour change.
I disagree. Even if you already have a high efficiency furnace and have weatherized your home, you are still being hit with the carbon tax. They should have benchmarks like they do with industry -- if your emission intensity is greater than the benchmark, you pay for the incremental cost. If you are below, you should not have to pay.
snootchiebootchies is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to snootchiebootchies For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:32 AM   #27
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

About equally close to UCP and Alberta party for me. My dilemma appears to be a conflict between social issues and economic issues as that seems to be where my differences mainly lie between each of the two parties. I'm much closer to one party socially and much closer to the other economically.
Lubicon is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:33 AM   #28
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Scores between 61% and 65% for all three of Liberals, AP, and NDP, which pretty-much matches how I feel about those three.
octothorp is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:36 AM   #29
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
Exp:
Default

Lib: 78
ndp: 69
ap: 62
ucp: 46


Clearly I am a Red Menace!
__________________
https://www.mergenlaw.com/
http://cjsw.com/program/fossil-records/
twitter/instagram @troutman1966

Last edited by troutman; 03-20-2019 at 09:51 AM.
troutman is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:38 AM   #30
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Alberta party at 67% followed by UCP at 63% and NDP at 59%. Knowing myself it makes sense. I guess I am going to start going through the Alberta Party platform a bit more. I wish they had an actual shot.
agulati is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:38 AM   #31
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

I align closest to AP as well, almost 80%. They won't get my vote though because of Mandell. Forcing out Clark and the Edmonton Arena deal where they got taken to the woodshed are two things that rub me the wrong way.

Maybe get someone else AP.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:39 AM   #32
Travis Munroe
Realtor®
 
Travis Munroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Y’all realise there are “neutral” and/or “I don’t know” answers right?

It also lets you look through each issue individually at the end and see where each party falls in it. For carbon tax I picked a non-answer as I know it’s required but I like the Federal version better than Alberta’s.
Well aware...

I do know and am not neutral on many topics, just wanted to see more in the form of the question to make a decision.

I checked I don't know to a number of questions that were too vague to answer and am wondering if that is why the FCP showed up so high on my radar as a previous poster mentioned "I dont know" lines up with FCP lol.
__________________

OFFICIAL CP REALTOR & PROPERTY MANAGER
Travis Munroe | Century 21 Elevate | 403.971.4300

Residential Buying & Selling
info@tmunroe.com
www.tmunroe.com

Property Management
travis@mpmCalgary.com
www.mpmCalgary.com
Travis Munroe is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Travis Munroe For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:39 AM   #33
Looch City
Looooooooooooooch
 
Looch City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

LIB 75%
NDP 68%
AP 63%
UCP 47%
FCP 32%

I'm leaning AP for this election, although I still need to learn more about them and the candidates.
Looch City is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:44 AM   #34
puckedoff
First Line Centre
 
puckedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

If this thread of results is any indication, shows that most people fall into that middle "I want good economic policy without dinosaur regressive views". How come parties can never gain traction with this platform!?! I find it very frustrating.
puckedoff is offline  
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to puckedoff For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2019, 09:45 AM   #35
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
If this thread of results is any indication, shows that most people fall into that middle "I want good economic policy without dinosaur regressive views". How come parties can never gain traction with this platform!?! I find it very frustrating.
The Alberta Party's public outreach has been very poor. I'm willing to bet most people don't even know they exist.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:45 AM   #36
dsavillian
First Line Centre
 
dsavillian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: losing CPHL bets
Exp:
Default

Pretty close to the NDP/Liberals, with AP a close third.
__________________
Formerly CPHL - LA Kings
dsavillian is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:49 AM   #37
Superflyer
Close, but no banana.
 
Superflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

I guess I am 74% liberal???
Alberta Party 69%
NDP 65%
UCP 50%
Freedom 30%

Huh, not the results I thought
Superflyer is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:49 AM   #38
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Just on some play testing with results, this might be the first time I haven't seen a massive bias in the results. Going straight neutral on all questions, for example, puts you at 52% UCP, 50% AP. Vote Compass usually tries to pull everybody left.

Oddly, they also have the UCP much closer to centre than they typically put the CPC federally. Which is actually rather unexpected.
Resolute 14 is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:51 AM   #39
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

Liberal
Alberta
NDP
UCP
habernac is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:53 AM   #40
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
If this thread of results is any indication, shows that most people fall into that middle "I want good economic policy without dinosaur regressive views". How come parties can never gain traction with this platform!?! I find it very frustrating.
I think that it's one thing to have it in your platform, and another thing when it comes to delivery. In my case, while I align most closely with the Alberta Party, that's a super inexperienced group and it's hard to think that the "unicorns and rainbows" platform they have could translate to anything meaningful.
Slava is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021