Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
You're right; those projects (Nakiska, Saddledome, etc.) aren't getting upgraded outside of the Olympics. That's why a vehicle like the Olympics is necessary for their long-term survival, and the only chance we have to get them proper funding assistance for overdue upgrades.
Also, if the City's contribution to the Games is $375M, and that's the approximate value of the field house (Olympics or not), why not invest that that now and receive funding from other levels of government to do so much more than just a field house? Because we won't see that potential investment otherwise.
|
Do you believe that it is a good use of public funds to add a new ski hill to Nakiska to expand a privately run facility that is primarily used by upper class Calgariams who already have a wide variety of skiing options within a 2 hr drive? And do you believe that with or without the Olympics that public funds should be spent on Nakiska?
Do you believe the city should spend money on the saddledome and that this should be done with or without the Olympics?
Do you believe the city should spend money on the Big 4 building and that this should be done with or without the Olympics.
Do you believe that the money the province is providing Calgary for the Olympics will be spent in the absence of the Olympics or is it new money financed through debt or taxes?
As an aside it’s funny that the field house has gone from a 200 million dollar asset to a 375 million dollar asset.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3918929