Quote:
Originally Posted by White Out 403
Had their been any coordination between Japan and the Germans the Soviets would have had a harder time with the Nazis. Not to mention the Italians having to be bailed out delayed the invasion months.
|
Yeah, these are both really valid points. The lack of a Japanese invasion of the East allowed the Soviets to shift a whole army of hardened winter troops to the Western Front. The Soviet experience in winter warfare and the time that was given by the fighting retreat and the change in weather conditions allowed Stalin to not only rally the people, but consolidate his forces.
The Italians really didn't have a good war, Mussolini's imperial aspiration were thwarted in Africa and the Southern front of Fortress Europe was poorly defended and forced Hitler to shift some of his more elite forces to defend his southern flank as the Italian Army turned out to be a paper tiger.
When you study military history you see a lot of examples of leaders that decided to open fronts without consolidating what they had, this was clearly the case here as Germany while it had a vast and extremely well trained and equipted military couldn't fight on three fronts at a time (Southern, Russia, Western Front).
The logic of it is that Hitler had a pretty firm alliance with Stalin and could have spent a lot more time on dealing with Great Britain and tried to beat the English into submission. Instead Hitler scattered his forces and became weak all over.