Trump permanently suspended from Twitter

[PsYcNeT]

Originally Posted by Matata

I remember the joe rogan podcast where he had Tim Pool grill Jack Dorseyand his Lawyer. Half the podcast went like this:

Tim: "Look at this example of someone on the left and right making essentially the same tweet. The person on the right was punished, the person on the left was not. Why is that?"

Lawyer: "The difference is context" *goes on to define the context based entirely on their political ideology*

So either they're playing politics, or they are so consumed by their ideology they are incapable of seeing past it, not sure which one is more dangerous.

Ah yeah, Tim Pool, a guy so smart he lost a debate to Vaush.

Vaush

[OldDutch]

Originally Posted by calculoso

IMO, this has nothing to do with Net Neutrality, but that’s just me

Your right. The argument is about as unpolitical as a Don Trump Jr tweet.

Kinda sorta has something to kinda sorta do with it in the loosest terms. Now watch opposite political talking head spike the ball hard in front of a crowd of uniformed.

[rubecube]

Originally Posted by PsYcNeT

Ah yeah, Tim Pool, a guy so smart he lost a debate to Vaush.

Vaush

My favourite Tim Pool moment was Tim citing The Avengers in a debate with Sam Seder and then promptly getting his lunch fed to him. Dude is a joke.

[afc wimbledon]

Originally Posted by PsYcNeT

Ah yeah, Tim Pool, a guy so smart he lost a debate to Vaush.

Vaush

I have no idea who either of those people are and on some level I feel proud of this.

[PsYcNeT]

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

I have no idea who either of those people are and on some level I feel proud of this.

You're not missing much on either side is the point really.

There are much better "idea guys" out there.

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

I have no idea who either of those people are and on some level I feel proud of this.

The less I understand about Psycnet's posts, the more I feel I'm hanging out on the correct parts of the web. If they ever start making sense to me, I'm going to step back from the internet.

[Yamer]

Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus

I followed Trump on twitter, not for his crazy statements but for the comments following them. The negative comments were at least 10-1 with the R-wingers getting their lunch handed to them.

I'll miss the comedy

The person that uses Twitter for the comments is a masochist.

[bob-loblaw]

Looks like it might be the end of Parler.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1348464441013186562

[Snuffleupagus]

Originally Posted by Yamer

The person that uses Twitter for the comments is a masochist.

I feel no pain

[Snuffleupagus]

Hahaha, keeps getting better.

PGA of America cut ties to President Donald Trump when it voted Sunday to take the PGA Championship event away from his New Jersey golf course next year.

[Yamer]

Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus

I feel no pain

*Gasp*...Sadist!

[#-3]

Originally Posted by Matata

I remember the joe rogan podcast where he had Tim Pool grill Jack Dorseyand his Lawyer. Half the podcast went like this:

Tim: "Look at this example of someone on the left and right making essentially the same tweet. The person on the right was punished, the person on the left was not. Why is that?"

Lawyer: "The difference is context" *goes on to define the context based entirely on their political ideology*

So either they're playing politics, or they are so consumed by their ideology they are incapable of seeing past it, not sure which one is more dangerous.

Well there are a few problems here,

#1 you are using the Joe Rogen podcast as a source of information, even worse you seem to find it entertaining.

#2 the lawyer made a terrible argument, he shouldn't be special pleading similar things in favour of his side.

#3 they were almost certainly working from a cherry picked data set. I'm certain it's pretty ease to find left wing people on twitter who were banned for something a right wing person said who was not banned. These isolated instance do not equate to proof of bias on either side.

#4 Even if once side is subject to more bans than the other side, it does not equate to proof of bias, because it's genuinely possible that one side it just more likely to break the terms of service and get reported, both of which would be required to be considered for a ban.

[Scorch]

[djsFlames]

Originally Posted by bob-loblaw

Looks like it might be the end of Parler.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1348464441013186562

I love that all these providers are closing their doors.

They'll have to write letters and gather in person soon.

But it'll be too much effort for them to keep up the cause for more than a few weeks. I know America.

[Robo]

Originally Posted by djsFlames

I love that all these providers are closing their doors.

They'll have to write letters and gather in person soon.

But it'll be too much effort for them to keep up the cause for more than a few weeks. I know America.

Plus I don't know how many of his followers can actually read or write

[sleepingmoose]

Originally Posted by djsFlames

I love that all these providers are closing their doors.

They'll have to write letters and gather in person soon.

But it'll be too much effort for them to keep up the cause for more than a few weeks. I know America.

Who would've thought that this is why Trump would regret gutting the USPS...

[Boreal]

https://twitter.com/user/status/1348502987451191297

Gab should go the way of Parlour soon enough, these people can’t help themselves.

Quite the Trump GIF to select for celebration, next to Epstein.

[djsFlames]

Oh lord.. to have that fly on the wall POV footage of Trump's reaction to all this.

I wonder how childish his tantrum was. More than the passenger blocked from flying? Probably.

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by photon

I've seen the wedding cake thing brought up in lots of places but the SCOTUS didn't decide the store could refuse to bake cakes, they dodged the question entirely and made a much more narrow ruling that the "Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which originally ruled against the baker, had been shown to be hostile to religion because of the remarks of one of its members."

So it's not going to support the idea that Amazon/Apple/Google et al can ban Parler or ban Trump.

Overly pedantic look at the issue

It is a simple obvious way to poke at the hypocrisy of the Republicans

[KevanGuy]

Parler is in the process of shutting down.
Edit: And it's gone.