07-07-2020, 03:35 PM
|
#1
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Bringing Coal Back
Thought this was an excellent, in depth read on the current changes to Coal regulations in Alberta with the pros, cons, history, and comparison to BC's policies laid out. Some commentary on the closure of parks, increased lobbying from the coal industry, and of course, the possibility of well paying jobs in poorer areas of the province. Thought this was wide-ranging and important enough that it deserved a new thread rather than piling on in the AB politics thread.
Quote:
Stand atop Mount Erickson in southeastern British Columbia and it feels like you can see forever.
Look north, and peer along the jagged ridgelines of the High Rock Range, which stretch to the horizon. To the south, snow-capped peaks in the Crowsnest Range cut into the blue sky, rising above dense green forests. Across the valley to the west, row upon row of sawtoothed summits fade into the distance, melding into mesmerizing array.
And then you look down.
Down the austere slope, in the valley below, is a massive, open-pit coal mine.
The word “mine” evokes images of soot-smeared workers in underground tunnels, but this is actually a mountain in the process of being deconstructed. A geologic wound. Its slopes are blackened and tiered, abuzz with enormous yellow trucks that look tiny from this distance, kicking up grey plumes of dust as they haul the pulverized mountain away, load by load.
This is one of five coal mines owned by Teck Resources in B.C’s Elk Valley. Together, these operations produce the bulk of the mining revenue in a province that has made coal its top export.
Now, turn on your heel and look to the east: past the Continental Divide, over the invisible border into Alberta’s Crowsnest Pass. There’s the distinctive, rounded peak of Crowsnest Mountain and, just beyond that, the Livingstone Range. The same, high-quality coal is locked away in these mountains, yet there are no operational mines here. The last one closed in 1983.
The difference dates back to 1976. That’s when the Progressive Conservative government of premier Peter Lougheed adopted its Coal Development Policy, which restricted open-pit mines across most of the province's Rocky Mountains and Foothills. For the last 44 years, this policy protected some of Alberta's most pristine and iconic landscapes. It also chased mining companies into neighbouring B.C., limiting potential livelihoods for thousands of Albertans.
Now, this long-standing tradeoff between environmental protection and economic opportunity is poised to change.
|
Grab a cup of coffee, this is a long read.
https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/long...ging-coal-back
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-07-2020, 05:24 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Bringing Coal back at the same time as easing restrictions on hiring 13 and 14 year-olds.
Curious timing...
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-07-2020, 07:16 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in a swamp, tied to a cypress tree
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to missdpuck For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brewmaster For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-07-2020, 07:55 PM
|
#5
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Its a short term solution that will have a long term impact, unfortunately the eastern slopes wont be the same. Its funny just 2 years after cracking down on OHV use in the eastern slopes they start cutting up the mountain sides for core sample drilling.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 10:22 PM
|
#6
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Honestly it seems like there is a fine balance to be struck here. Should there be a mine around Coleman/pincher and potentially elsewhere? Sounds like yes. Should it be open season on the Eastern slopes of the Rockies? Most Albertans would probably say no.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2020, 07:55 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewmaster
While we don't like the reality of it, the steel we use in almost everything is made using metallurgic coal and there is currently no replacement, unlike thermal coal used for electricity.
|
I would put myself in the camp of "in favor of thoughtful development of Alberta's met coal resources." This is actually a good time to do so, because Teck is moving their exports away from the Westshore terminal in BC to a terminal they co-own with Canpotex. That means Westshore is highly motivated to find new sources of export coal - I suspect low terminal costs could be negotiated.
But the quoted portion about no alternatives to met coal just isn't true. Certainly in N. America steel production has been moving from blast furnaces (which use met coal) to electric arc furnaces (which don't). The Chinese haven't made this switch yet.
The reason for that (imo) is largely historical. EAF production has mostly used scrap steel in the past. Our mature economies generate a lot of scrap compared to how much steel we produce. Eg the number of new cars isnt much more than the number of 20 year old cars getting scrapped. Growth in China means they are making way more cars now than in the past, so not much scrap as a ratio to new steel.
But electric arc furnaces can also use direct reduced iron pellets. That hasn't happened much in the past, but its technologically mature, it's just an economic question. And low gas prices and high met coal prices make the production of DRI pellets cheaper (DRI is the same iron ore reduced to iron using nat gas), and electric arc furnaces use tons of electricity which is also made cheaper by cheap natural gas.
So while China has built tons of blast furnaces (that will presumably remain operating for quite some time) there absolutely is a viable substitute for metallurgical coal.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2020, 10:07 PM
|
#8
|
Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
I'm not against it if there is a market, but I hope it's done responsibly. That includes following ultra strict environmental regulations, not selling crown land or closing provincial parks that would otherwise be used by Albertan residents. I also think this has to be done with a much better, more comprehensive and forward-thinking diversification plan.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.
|
|