Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-20-2021, 10:22 AM   #41
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
Just because a player is going to be UFA at the end of the season doesn't mean that the team is going to lose that player for nothing. There is still a chance of signing with the team he's currently with.

3rd consecutive one year contract. Maybe he likes negotiating every year?
Or maybe he has specific destinations in mind and is not wanting to give up UFA years.
agulati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:23 AM   #42
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
I don't think they're super high on Zadorov, so they didn't want to offer him term.
So why spend a pick to get him?
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:23 AM   #43
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
Just because a player is going to be UFA at the end of the season doesn't mean that the team is going to lose that player for nothing. There is still a chance of signing with the team he's currently with.

3rd consecutive one year contract. Maybe he likes negotiating every year?
more likely each team over estimates what he'll bring on the ice and lets him go.
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:23 AM   #44
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

“It’s a good contract because it’s a bad contract but short so it ends soon”
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:25 AM   #45
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
The dollar figure is still far too high, though.
It's really not though.

Poolman just got $2.5M
Ceci got $3.25M (and 4 years)
Hamonic got $3.0M
Forbort got $3.0M

Maybe a slight overpay of $500k but I think the Flames intention here was to keep it to a 1 year deal. If he ends up fitting in then you can re-sign him in the season, if he doesn't work out then you probably can recoup your pick at the deadline.

Keeping the term down here is a positive, not a negative.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:25 AM   #46
stemit14
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I think it’s a smart move for this season. Good chance for a player like him to thrive under Sutter’s system and he’ll be motivated in a UFA contract year. He can end up costing more to retain if he has a good season but it also minimizes the risk of he’s not a good fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:26 AM   #47
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Well I'm glad we didn't sign him long term as I'm not sold on the player.

But I'm also not thrilled we gave up a pick for a one year rental. Now there is the chance of dealing him at the deadline but IMO there's no way this Sutter coached team isn't in the mix for playoffs.

So I guess it's OK. Hope he's decent.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:27 AM   #48
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
It's really not though.

Poolman just got $2.5M
Ceci got $3.25M (and 4 years)
Hamonic got $3.0M
Forbort got $3.0M

Maybe a slight overpay of $500k but I think the Flames intention here was to keep it to a 1 year deal. If he ends up fitting in then you can renegotiate, if he doesn't work out then you probably can recoup your pick at the deadline.

Keeping the term down here is a positive, not a negative.
And all of those contracts are also very bad.

Anyway the one-year aspect of it is fine. It's just too much money for one year and an indictment of the Flames' decision to trade for this player in the first place. Just a pretty bad bet to acquire a low-upside player with a low-upside contract.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:28 AM   #49
flames_fan13
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Richmond
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
So why spend a pick to get him?
Needed someone to fill Gio's spot this year and maybe they didn't like the other options this year. It also might mean they are keeping their options open for next offseason because they see a player on the list they may be going for.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!!!!
flames_fan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:28 AM   #50
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
So why spend a pick to get him?
Because they had next to no options that they found palatable on the UFA market? Have you seen the list of guys that are available? Here are the top 10 UFAs by games played last year.


PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
1. Zdeno Chara - 44 LD Left 55 2 8 10 0.18 5 67 0.03 18:19 - - - - - NMC UFA $795,000 $795,000
2. Erik Gudbranson - 29 RD Right 45 1 3 4 0.09 -12 58 0.02 17:54 - - - - - UFA $4,000,000 $3,000,000
3. Jason Demers - 33 RD Right 41 0 4 4 0.10 -4 44 0.00 17:14 - - - - - UFA $4,500,000 $3,600,000
4. Sami Vatanen - 30 LD/RD Right 39 2 4 6 0.15 3 55 0.04 17:01 - - - - - UFA $2,000,000 $2,000,000
5. Jordie Benn - 33 LD/RD Left 39 1 9 10 0.26 7 45 0.02 14:45 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $2,000,000 $1,600,000
6. Ben Hutton - 28 LD Left 38 1 4 5 0.13 -13 54 0.02 18:27 - - - - - UFA $950,000 $950,000
7. Erik Gustafsson - 29 LD/RD Left 29 1 11 12 0.41 -1 33 0.03 16:42 - - - - - UFA $3,000,000 $3,000,000
8. Michael Stone - 31 RD Right 21 2 2 4 0.19 -1 41 0.05 16:04 - - - - - UFA $700,000 $700,000
9. Braydon Coburn - 36 LD Left 19 0 2 2 0.11 -3 18 0.00 16:02 - - - - - NTC UFA $1,700,000 $1,600,000


I don't know about you but I don't want any of those guys over Zadorov.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
Cali Panthers Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:28 AM   #51
Burning Beard
First Line Centre
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
It's really not though.

Poolman just got $2.5M
Ceci got $3.25M (and 4 years)
Hamonic got $3.0M
Forbort got $3.0M

Maybe a slight overpay of $500k but I think the Flames intention here was to keep it to a 1 year deal. If he ends up fitting in then you can re-sign him in the season, if he doesn't work out then you probably can recoup your pick at the deadline.

Keeping the term down here is a positive, not a negative.
Agreed. If he fits in this year negotiate a new contract with term. If he doesn't fit then no big loss. Hard to find anything to complain about here for me personally. Obviously CP feels differently but that's a given Hahaha.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:29 AM   #52
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

They traded for Zadorov before the UFA market even opened, though. Maybe they just knew they were going to strike out if they didn't pull the trigger but idk.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:29 AM   #53
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Because they had next to no options that they found palatable on the UFA market? Have you seen the list of guys that are available? Here are the top 10 UFAs by games played last year.

I don't know about you but I don't want any of those guys over Zadorov.
Then don't do anything. Keep the pick and your costs low by elevating Valimaki and playing Kylington or Mackey on the 3rd pair.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #54
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
And all of those contracts are also very bad.

Anyway the one-year aspect of it is fine. It's just too much money for one year and an indictment of the Flames' decision to trade for this player in the first place. Just a pretty bad bet to acquire a low-upside player with a low-upside contract.

I’m hoping the intangibles help like when Engelland was paid an amount people didn’t understand
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #55
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Super happy we didn’t give him a multi year contract

I predict he will be the most hated player by fans on the team this year
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #56
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
I think it’s a smart move for this season. Good chance for a player like him to thrive under Sutter’s system and he’ll be motivated in a UFA contract year. He can end up costing more to retain if he has a good season but it also minimizes the risk of he’s not a good fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doesn’t that make it sort of a lose lose? He plays like he has been he isn’t worth the money if he takes a big step forward under Sutter you immediately have to pay him more
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #57
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

As a reminder, a 3rd round pick has a very low shot of ever making the NHL, never mind playing a full season in a meaningful role. It's a small price to pay for a solid player who should fit well in Sutter's system.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
Cali Panthers Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:30 AM   #58
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Because they had next to no options that they found palatable on the UFA market? Have you seen the list of guys that are available? Here are the top 10 UFAs by games played last year.


PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
1. Zdeno Chara - 44 LD Left 55 2 8 10 0.18 5 67 0.03 18:19 - - - - - NMC UFA $795,000 $795,000
2. Erik Gudbranson - 29 RD Right 45 1 3 4 0.09 -12 58 0.02 17:54 - - - - - UFA $4,000,000 $3,000,000
3. Jason Demers - 33 RD Right 41 0 4 4 0.10 -4 44 0.00 17:14 - - - - - UFA $4,500,000 $3,600,000
4. Sami Vatanen - 30 LD/RD Right 39 2 4 6 0.15 3 55 0.04 17:01 - - - - - UFA $2,000,000 $2,000,000
5. Jordie Benn - 33 LD/RD Left 39 1 9 10 0.26 7 45 0.02 14:45 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $2,000,000 $1,600,000
6. Ben Hutton - 28 LD Left 38 1 4 5 0.13 -13 54 0.02 18:27 - - - - - UFA $950,000 $950,000
7. Erik Gustafsson - 29 LD/RD Left 29 1 11 12 0.41 -1 33 0.03 16:42 - - - - - UFA $3,000,000 $3,000,000
8. Michael Stone - 31 RD Right 21 2 2 4 0.19 -1 41 0.05 16:04 - - - - - UFA $700,000 $700,000
9. Braydon Coburn - 36 LD Left 19 0 2 2 0.11 -3 18 0.00 16:02 - - - - - NTC UFA $1,700,000 $1,600,000


I don't know about you but I don't want any of those guys over Zadorov.
When they traded for Zadorov, a lot more players were available through free agency. I mean he might still be a decent option over many of the contracts handed out. I’m fine with the player and okay with dollar value. I’m not a big fan of walking him to UFA though.
agulati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 10:31 AM   #59
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
And all of those contracts are also very bad.

Anyway the one-year aspect of it is fine. It's just too much money for one year and an indictment of the Flames' decision to trade for this player in the first place. Just a pretty bad bet to acquire a low-upside player with a low-upside contract.
I think it's just the market for d-men.

$10M+ is an elite d-man now.

$7-10M is a top pairing dman (Nurse, Jones, Werenski)

$5-7M is second pairing / above average d-man

$2-4M pretty much gets you replacement level players.

$1-2M gets you 6/7 dmen or guys on show me deal.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2021, 10:31 AM   #60
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Because they had next to no options that they found palatable on the UFA market? Have you seen the list of guys that are available? Here are the top 10 UFAs by games played last year.


PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
1. Zdeno Chara - 44 LD Left 55 2 8 10 0.18 5 67 0.03 18:19 - - - - - NMC UFA $795,000 $795,000
2. Erik Gudbranson - 29 RD Right 45 1 3 4 0.09 -12 58 0.02 17:54 - - - - - UFA $4,000,000 $3,000,000
3. Jason Demers - 33 RD Right 41 0 4 4 0.10 -4 44 0.00 17:14 - - - - - UFA $4,500,000 $3,600,000
4. Sami Vatanen - 30 LD/RD Right 39 2 4 6 0.15 3 55 0.04 17:01 - - - - - UFA $2,000,000 $2,000,000
5. Jordie Benn - 33 LD/RD Left 39 1 9 10 0.26 7 45 0.02 14:45 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $2,000,000 $1,600,000
6. Ben Hutton - 28 LD Left 38 1 4 5 0.13 -13 54 0.02 18:27 - - - - - UFA $950,000 $950,000
7. Erik Gustafsson - 29 LD/RD Left 29 1 11 12 0.41 -1 33 0.03 16:42 - - - - - UFA $3,000,000 $3,000,000
8. Michael Stone - 31 RD Right 21 2 2 4 0.19 -1 41 0.05 16:04 - - - - - UFA $700,000 $700,000
9. Braydon Coburn - 36 LD Left 19 0 2 2 0.11 -3 18 0.00 16:02 - - - - - NTC UFA $1,700,000 $1,600,000


I don't know about you but I don't want any of those guys over Zadorov.

That reminds me. When are we signing Michael Stone?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021