05-19-2012, 11:02 AM
|
#1
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
|
How do you like Wind? - Shaw Purchases Wind
Is anybody on wind mobile here?
How has your expierience been? Would you recommend it? Their prices seem much better. I've heard $15 a month means you pay $15 at the end of the month not $72.
How's the coverage?
Their customer service also seems to be better.
Last edited by stampsx2; 12-16-2015 at 04:39 PM.
|
|
|
05-19-2012, 11:20 AM
|
#2
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
i did a lot of research on it a few months ago and it sounded like although they are expanding coverage via new towers, there are still some dead zones which get worse depending on what phone you use. there was a google map kind of thing that had reception quality at various locations recorded online somewhere
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:14 AM
|
#3
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
In terms of how their coverage is in their zone, it's fine. It has its bad spots just like Rogers, Bell, or Telus. Coverage is never perfect.
The drawback of course is outside the cities you're jumping on Rogers networks and pay more for it. Doing that you're still going to pay alot less then on similar plans with the big three.
Customer service can be a pain, but overall I've been with Wind for a year and a half and am happy with the service.
My plan, 40 bucks a month for every damn think can't be beat.
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:22 AM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Its fine. The reception can be better but the company is still fairly small. Overall i'm fine with it.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:55 AM
|
#5
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary.
|
I have been with Wind for 9 months and have loved the experience.
The coverage within the city is identical to other carriers.....finding a place without connectivity isn't easy and urban connectivity really shouldn't be a factor in the decision. And just to be clear, Wind offers a trial window (7 day, iirc) in which a no fee cancellation can be made if you're not satisfied.
Once you leave the city (Cross Iron Mills area) you start roaming. Connectivity is never a problem (QE2, Hwy2) and the rates are perfectly normal. You won't break the bank to use your phone and it would take A LOT of roaming voice/data to get your bill into the $70, $80, $90 range that the big three charge for their plans.
My bill doesn't really fluctuate. The plan is $29/month (Unlimited voice, unlimited data, unlimited text, voicemail, call forward ) and comes out to $30.45 with tax. No connection charges, no "Government" fees, nothing. Depending on my out of town usage, the bill has gotten up to about $35.00.
I tallied my 9 bills this morning and can say that for $282.31 I have obtained 9 full months of superior quality voice/data service (on a subsidized smartphone no less). That's $31.37 on average and easily half (probably a third) of a Telus/Rogers/ Bell bill.
There have been comments in other threads that Wind is going to close down (or be bought out or run out of money) because of foreign ownership rules. The Canadian Government has made it clear that competition is here to stay, and has relaxed ownership rules to ensure it remains.
Further, with the fear mongering behind them, Wind has finally begun to achieve the user growth it expected. They increased the year-to-year Q1 subscription rate by 52.9% and sit at well over 400,000 users.
In short - there really isn't any reason for Calgarians to continue overpaying for cell service.
__________________
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:57 AM
|
#6
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I switched from Rogers to Wind back in September and have never looked back.
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 08:03 AM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilsonFourTwo
In short - there really isn't any reason for Calgarians to continue overpaying for cell service.
|
This is one of the main reasons why we switched to wind. Rogers was a pain and they lied to us about a lot of stuff. They ripped of my mom and she told them to go to hell. It was rather sad how Rogers tried to keep us with them by saying all of this bad stuff about wind which is a bunch of bull. Wind has been better for my mom and for me i don't even really notice much of a difference other than reception is some areas. I defiantly recommend wind for people who don't use their cell phones as much as others.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 11:55 AM
|
#8
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NW Calgary
|
I'd recommend it. Found some deadspots in the NW Costco and for some reason a certain spot in Edgemont's World Health (might be my phone) but other than that have had no problems. Even did some texting in Montreal and rates were normal out of town texting rates. My plan is amazing as i pay $40 ($42 with gst) for unlimited everything compared to Telus where I paid $47-$50 dollars (why does it fluctuate) for limits on everything and no data .
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 12:23 PM
|
#9
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlW
I'd recommend it. Found some deadspots in the NW Costco and for some reason a certain spot in Edgemont's World Health (might be my phone) but other than that have had no problems. Even did some texting in Montreal and rates were normal out of town texting rates. My plan is amazing as i pay $40 ($42 with gst) for unlimited everything compared to Telus where I paid $47-$50 dollars (why does it fluctuate) for limits on everything and no data .
|
Yeah, I've had this plan since December 2010 and have never paid over 42 bucks. Several months later I finally realized I never used my house phone so dropped that too, I was only keeping that for long distance, so saved however much per month there.
I can't recall correctly but I think my home phone service through Shaw was higher per month then all of my cell bill because of the long distance.
What a scam.
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 12:31 PM
|
#10
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
I really wish I had gotten onboard the unlimited data Wind plan. I would listen to internet radio all day long.
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 12:37 PM
|
#11
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Langley, BC
|
Switched over from Telus to Wind back in Dec 2010 and have never looked back. I don't often travel outside of Vancouver or Calgary so roaming is never an issue.
There are some deadspots inside malls and such, and they have no coverage in the underground portions of the Skytrain in Vancouver, but overall its quite reliable.
I was paying $55+ for a bare bones Telus plan with no data and limited calling and texting, I now pay $36.75/month for unlimited calling text and data. Dropping my Telus home phone also saves another $40 a month! Unless you travel outside the home zones a lot, I really don't see any reason to not go with Wind.
__________________
"I would love to be a goal scorer, but this is how I have to play. You do whatever brings meatloaf to the table."
Ville Nieminen
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 12:48 PM
|
#12
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
I really wish I had gotten onboard the unlimited data Wind plan. I would listen to internet radio all day long.
|
I think it's a permanent plan now, unless there is some minor detail I'm missing.
http://www2.windmobile.ca/en/Pages/v..._utmk=20235320
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 04:19 PM
|
#13
|
Had an idea!
|
How much does it actually cost to go out of the home zone?
Considering they are putting up their own towers, I'd imagine Wind will just keep getting better and better with more and more coverage.
For me I know if I actually bother to check the amount of time I spend in my 'home' area its WAY over 90%. Probably closer to 97%. So for me their plans would work perfectly.
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 11:31 PM
|
#14
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
are there any issues with being in what they say is home zone but your phone is roaming? i know you can get them to lock roaming to prevent roaming charges and it might not be that applicable here, but i did remember reading lots of problems with this (roaming in a home zone) in the GTA and some in VAN. also what phones are you guys using with them?
i have been mulling over switching for a while now, but i keep hearing rumors that the new iphone might be compatible with their frequency and for me that'd seal the deal.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 07:19 AM
|
#15
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary.
|
Yes, there's been a lot of pressure to have an iPhone operating on AWS and it looks as though its actually going to happen. The big push comes from T-Mobile who have almost 150 million customers worldwide and are the fourth largest in the USA.
__________________
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 08:00 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
I read an article on The City of Calgary cellphone expense and it was astronomical!
5,816 users
$3.2 million
$550.21 average cost per public servant!
Crazy Cellphone use paid for by our taxes!
Being that Wind is a $40.00 cost/month I think the city should switch over...
5816 x 40.00 = $232,640
Last edited by To Be Quite Honest; 05-21-2012 at 08:05 AM.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 08:31 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
interesting tid-bit (observed in TO, but likely similar nationally):
wind piggy backs a lot off roger's network for rural area coverage, however, this can disrupt your signal carrier in urban areas....
This means when you are coming out of a basement/garage/etc, the signal strength algorithm on the phone/bs may result in you first catching signal with rogers (show's as a gsm connection) where you won't actually have any service at all.
This was frustrating, as it could mean that you woudn't have service for 10-15 mins until you reach a handoff point to a stronger signal wind network bs.
Solution: Change your network settings to "3g only" and it has made my service/signal restoration period much more satisfactory.
i don't pay for my phone (work), but once i set up the above, i really have no complaints with wind. If you're saving $, especially if it's substantial, it's not a bad carrier thus far.
Last edited by bubbsy; 05-21-2012 at 08:39 AM.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:24 AM
|
#18
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
|
How is their data? The guy at future shop told me not to get it, it's really slow.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:41 AM
|
#19
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Olympic Saddledome
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by To Be Quite Honest
I read an article on The City of Calgary cellphone expense and it was astronomical!
5,816 users
$3.2 million
$550.21 average cost per public servant!
Crazy Cellphone use paid for by our taxes!
Being that Wind is a $40.00 cost/month I think the city should switch over...
5816 x 40.00 = $232,640
|
You are comparing apples apples and oranges...the editorial is using an annual figure, and you are giving a monthly figure...that $550.21 a year is actually fairly near what you are advocating,.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 12:49 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio
You are comparing apples apples and oranges...the editorial is using an annual figure, and you are giving a monthly figure...that $550.21 a year is actually fairly near what you are advocating,.
|
I've only have 4 hours of sleep in the last 2 days... Is that a valid excuse?
Okay. So not every phone needs Long distance or large amounts of data.
Wind 25 is fine for most and for the managers and executives Wind 40.
5,816 users
10% or 581 Managers and Executives (guessing): 40 * 12 = $480/year * 581 = $278,880
90% or 5235 regular use users: 25 *12 = $300/year * 5235 = 1,570,500
$1,849,380 VS 3,200,000 is a difference of $1,350,620.
Heck that can even create a job or two in cell phone monitoring to catch frequent abusers and still clear 1 250 620 in savings!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.
|
|