Quote:
Originally Posted by gamesaver
At this point I have to ask you though, are you actually watching Flames games?
|
Let me simplify this for you then.
The claim made is that Brodie is *directly* responsible for as many goals as he had points, 34.
That doesn't mean 100 giveaways, it means at least 34 giveaways *leading to goals*.
Yes, I watch the games
, and I remember some bad plays leading to goals. But *not* 34. You show a couple of Youtube videos, guessing they don't show 34 goals either.
So yes, if someone makes such an hyperbolic claim, it should be challenged. Even as simple a stat as +/- shows Brodie to be a net positive.