10-04-2022, 08:34 AM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I would imagine size was probably the biggest factor that led to them taking Stromgren over Stankoven.
|
|
|
10-04-2022, 08:51 AM
|
#62
|
Truculent!
|
The last couple Flames drafts have been incredibly bad.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
|
|
|
|
10-04-2022, 09:17 AM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Stromgren's production in his draft year was actually really good, and with his size and skill profile I see what the Flames liked.
Lots of fans were clamoring for Stankoven who looked like he had first round talent, so it stings but I don't think this was the case where the Flames took a big guy just because he was big. Stromgren looked big and skilled in that draft year, and he was playing where as Stankoven didn't play at all that season because of COVID.
I would have preferred Stankoven too, but I think this is where teams overthink it and could see why they wouldn't want to take another smaller forward after taking Coronato with the first round pick.
I also wouldn't be that worried about the production just yet. He's still very young for the SHL which is an older league now than it was ever been and it's not easy to crack a lineup as a guy who only just turned 19 in July (Stromgren was young for his draft year).
There are only about 20 guys that are 20 or under playing a full time role in the SHL this year so far. With the leading scorers having 4 points, and only 9 guys having a point at all.
So not a league he's going to put up huge numbers in.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-04-2022, 09:34 AM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth
The last couple Flames drafts have been incredibly bad.
|
How are you judging this?
|
|
|
10-04-2022, 09:36 AM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
|
I will preface this by saying that I think Stankoven is a good prospect.
But he also hasn't proven he can be an NHLer.
The underlying premise is that there continues to be a bias against smaller players in the NHL, such that you can get good draft value by drafting those guys earlier. And there may be. The shining example of this is Alex Debrincant, drafted in a similar spot as Stankoven.
But there are also very few players like him in the NHL.
Stankoven has a lot to like as a prospect, but will still need to buck the trend to make the NHL or be an impact player.
|
|
|
10-04-2022, 10:25 AM
|
#66
|
Truculent!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
How are you judging this?
|
The production levels of the players drafted since 2018.
Outside of Coronato and Wolf the team hasn't hit on a single player that has star potential.
And especially in the last two drafts they have drafted for size and character.
Similar drafting attributes to the last time Sutter was in the Org, and those years led to a dearth of talent in the system.
Their system is ranked low for a reason.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
|
|
|
|
10-04-2022, 10:48 AM
|
#67
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth
The production levels of the players drafted since 2018.
Outside of Coronato and Wolf the team hasn't hit on a single player that has star potential.
And especially in the last two drafts they have drafted for size and character.
Similar drafting attributes to the last time Sutter was in the Org, and those years led to a dearth of talent in the system.
Their system is ranked low for a reason.
|
Well you are moving the goal posts. Are you talking about the last 2 drafts or since 2018.
Their system is ranked low because of lack of picks including in the top 2 rounds.
The 2022 draft looks not good because they had no picks in the 1st, and only 3 overall. Really hard to offer any real judgement 3 months later from that.
For the 2021 draft, Coronato looks like a good 1st rounder. Stromgren didn't have a great D+1 season so I'll give you that. The middle rounds have some intrigue, lead by Jack Beck who had a major increase in his production YoY.
I just it's far too early to offer any judgements of the last 2 drafts.
Not sure if you are including 2020 but if you are I would say:
- Zary is tracking nicely despite some injuries
- Yuzentzov is developing along, including a lot of praise in the WJCs. Probably limited upside by high floor
- Poirier is the opposite. Unreal talent but needs to really develop his defense
- Then you have Kerins who has popped.
Again the problem has been lack of picks.
When people say that the last two drafts have been "incredibly bad" it seems like a very knee jerk opinion not based on much.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-04-2022, 01:36 PM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Yeah the 2022 draft is bad...but that's just because we had no picks.
2021 is perfectly fine at this point. Coronato still looks great, Stromgren regressed but him playing in the SHL is actually a good step forward even if the points haven't come yet, the rest of that draft is too early to tell but some good progression.
Not taking Stankoven doesn't automatically make the entire draft bad.
2020 actually looks pretty good IMO. Zary, Kuznetsov, Poirier, Kerins all have potential.
2019 as well. Pelletier and Wolf had amazing AHL rookie seasons and look like they could both be NHL contributors.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2022, 09:13 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
We need better European Scouts.
Outside of Kylington, when was the last European League pick that panned out or even looked promising?
Singling out Kylington because he was a top 10 forecasted player before that draft season.
Last edited by Samonadreau; 10-07-2022 at 12:52 AM.
|
|
|
10-06-2022, 11:27 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I watched Stromgren pretty closely in the U-18’s, and he was a fantastic blend of size, skating, and stickhandling. It’s not over the moon that he was picked where he was, or the fact that he was picked over Stankoven. Some analysts had him going in the late first at various points in his draft year.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2022, 05:54 AM
|
#71
|
Scoring Winger
|
At least he's getting into games. Can't say the same about Topi Ronni in Liiga.
|
|
|
10-07-2022, 09:11 AM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau
We need better European Scouts.
Outside of Kylington, when was the last European League pick that panned out or even looked promising?
Singling out Kylington because he was a top 10 forecasted player before that draft season.
|
It's hard to judge because they haven't drafted many.
In the last number of years:
Topi Ronni: Way too early
William Stromgren
Daniiil Chechelev: 2020 goalie, 4th round, progression has been good
Ilya Nikolaev: 2019, 3rd round. Progression has been solid
Lucas Feurk: 2019 4th round
It's just hard to make such a blunt judgement when there are so few picks made out of Europe.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2022, 07:54 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
It's hard to judge because they haven't drafted many.
In the last number of years:
Topi Ronni: Way too early
William Stromgren
Daniiil Chechelev: 2020 goalie, 4th round, progression has been good
Ilya Nikolaev: 2019, 3rd round. Progression has been solid
Lucas Feurk: 2019 4th round
It's just hard to make such a blunt judgement when there are so few picks made out of Europe.
|
Fair enough.
Last edited by Samonadreau; 10-07-2022 at 09:04 PM.
|
|
|
10-09-2022, 12:45 AM
|
#74
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
1 point in 8 SHL games.
|
|
|
10-09-2022, 07:28 AM
|
#75
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Spin all you want but all indications show this dude is a bust
|
|
|
10-09-2022, 09:25 AM
|
#76
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoller
At least he's getting into games. Can't say the same about Topi Ronni in Liiga.
|
Ronni was injured and now he's sick.
|
|
|
10-10-2022, 11:07 PM
|
#77
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
Spin all you want but all indications show this dude is a bust
|
The kid is 19 years old...
|
|
|
10-11-2022, 09:44 AM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Well you are moving the goal posts. Are you talking about the last 2 drafts or since 2018.
Their system is ranked low because of lack of picks including in the top 2 rounds.
The 2022 draft looks not good because they had no picks in the 1st, and only 3 overall. Really hard to offer any real judgement 3 months later from that.
For the 2021 draft, Coronato looks like a good 1st rounder. Stromgren didn't have a great D+1 season so I'll give you that. The middle rounds have some intrigue, lead by Jack Beck who had a major increase in his production YoY.
I just it's far too early to offer any judgements of the last 2 drafts.
Not sure if you are including 2020 but if you are I would say:
- Zary is tracking nicely despite some injuries
- Yuzentzov is developing along, including a lot of praise in the WJCs. Probably limited upside by high floor
- Poirier is the opposite. Unreal talent but needs to really develop his defense
- Then you have Kerins who has popped.
Again the problem has been lack of picks.
When people say that the last two drafts have been "incredibly bad" it seems like a very knee jerk opinion not based on much.
|
That's fine if you are looking at the Flames in a complete vacuum, but you need to compare that to other teams and find where you rank. Every team is going to have low level prospects 2 years after a draft. You need more 'pops' because even the 'pops' are question marks to make it but they at least have a chance vs the other guys who are likely already on the outside looking in.
|
|
|
10-11-2022, 03:29 PM
|
#79
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
That's fine if you are looking at the Flames in a complete vacuum, but you need to compare that to other teams and find where you rank. Every team is going to have low level prospects 2 years after a draft. You need more 'pops' because even the 'pops' are question marks to make it but they at least have a chance vs the other guys who are likely already on the outside looking in.
|
So it's not perfect but Byron Bader has a tool that does exactly this with his model.
Under Treliving (2015-2022: personally don't count 2014 as he had been on the job for like 2 weeks) the Flames rank 4th.
# of NHLers: 5 (Tied 1st)
# of Stars: 2 (Tied 2nd)
Star Success Rate: 4.5% (Tied 2nd)
# of Picks: 44 (Tied 22nd - which is the issue. We don't pick enough)
If you look at our current prospect base though it looks below average (Byron ranks it 19th) because the last couple years we've drafted later, and had few picks.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-13-2022, 03:15 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
So it's not perfect but Byron Bader has a tool that does exactly this with his model.
Under Treliving (2015-2022: personally don't count 2014 as he had been on the job for like 2 weeks) the Flames rank 4th.
# of NHLers: 5 (Tied 1st)
# of Stars: 2 (Tied 2nd)
Star Success Rate: 4.5% (Tied 2nd)
# of Picks: 44 (Tied 22nd - which is the issue. We don't pick enough)
If you look at our current prospect base though it looks below average (Byron ranks it 19th) because the last couple years we've drafted later, and had few picks.
|
I don't think there is any doubt that 2015 and 2016 drafts were home runs even if Fox didn't show up. But once you get past those 2 drafts - its not looking great.
2017 is looking like a whiff with Valamaki being waived, you're left with Ruzicka who is still fighting to earn a job.
2018 is probably a complete whiff which is to be expected when you don't pick before the 4th round. Too early to tell on the rest - but a lot of hope rests of goalies (who are voodoo) panning out.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 AM.
|
|