|
View Poll Results: Should deal pass?
|
|
Pass it!
|
   
|
12 |
57.14% |
|
Rejected!
|
  
|
9 |
42.86% |
02-02-2018, 02:29 PM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM
- Ferguson, Dylan (G) ECHL
|
How is this guy not in my system?
__________________
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity - Gordie Howe
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TurdFerguson For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 02:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
It's a yes from me, however i don't really see the difference between this deal and the last one
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 02:39 PM
|
#4
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
The last deal had Dave involved. ha.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 02:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
I only want Yandle because Dave did
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 03:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
For me, it works
I wasn't planning on resigning Yandle and Ferguson is a throw in for me
Jooris and Claesson give me NHL ready young bottom 6/4 guys, and I get my 2nd that I wanted too.
Zuhlsdorf gives me a D prospect who has potential to play in a couple years. He's putting up decent numbers (+/-) at U of M, and is supposed to be a solid defensive defenseman
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to manwiches For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 04:52 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Not sure how this is better at all, the 2nd round pick is even worse, at least the one I offered had potential for him to snag a 1st rounder.
Also interesting to note that Grant was quick to comment on the previous trade with his thoughts that it was not a good deal, I have a feeling many simply decided to follow the opinion of our fearless leader considering he was the first to chime in.
No comment from Grant on this one?
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 04:53 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Hdhdhd
Last edited by MJK; 02-02-2018 at 05:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
I mean I also gave up two prospects and an NHL forward
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:09 PM
|
#10
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJK
Not sure how this is better at all, the 2nd round pick is even worse, at least the one I offered had potential for him to snag a 1st rounder.
Also interesting to note that Grant was quick to comment on the previous trade with his thoughts that it was not a good deal, I have a feeling many simply decided to follow the opinion of our fearless leader considering he was the first to chime in.
No comment from Grant on this one?
|
You don't see how this deal is different?
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:16 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJK
Not sure how this is better at all, the 2nd round pick is even worse, at least the one I offered had potential for him to snag a 1st rounder.
Also interesting to note that Grant was quick to comment on the previous trade with his thoughts that it was not a good deal, I have a feeling many simply decided to follow the opinion of our fearless leader considering he was the first to chime in.
No comment from Grant on this one?
|
Lord knows people freely disagree with me all the time on CPHL subjects. Not sure why that would be different in this case.
I'm still mulling this one over. I don't know the players involved so need to read up on them.
So i don't have a strong gut reaction, which probably means its OK.
I think your deal stunk and I said so.
I get that GMs dont' like it when their deals get rejected. They never have. At least now it isn't in the commissioners' hands. The system works well. Except GMs still get in a snit when their deal doesn't go through.
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:18 PM
|
#12
|
|
Franchise Player
|
OK now that I look at it I actually agree that this deal is not better than the one that Dave offered. I don't like the fact the pick sits a year out, and the additional players are largely bit guys that won't amount to anything.
I don't see it being a good return for Yandle.
But if the league feels overall it is good then it goes through!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:21 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
You don't see how this deal is different?
|
I do see how it is different, it’s worse!
I was offering a solid 2018 2nd that is trending to be an early pick in the round. We draft before the NHL so there is an opportunity for him to snag a 1st rounder with my deal.
This new deal the pick is in 2019 and the 3 players added are 4th liners and are a dime a donzen.
So I personally would prefer the opportunity to snag a 1st rounder over what he just got.
When you have crap and then add crap too it, it’s still crap.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:22 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM
OK now that I look at it I actually agree that this deal is not better than the one that Dave offered. I don't like the fact the pick sits a year out, and the additional players are largely bit guys that won't amount to anything.
I don't see it being a good return for Yandle.
But if the league feels overall it is good then it goes through!
|
You should have posted first!
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:24 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJK
You should have posted first!
|
At work, didn't have time to look up the players. Claesson was a guy that I recall liking at one time but he hasn't trended well. So needed time to pull up the players involved. If manwiches likes the prospects that's good.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:30 PM
|
#16
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
Maybe I'm not up to date with Claesson. I thought he was turning into something. Sorry Dave. I may have voted without all the facts on this one.
I still don't like the first deal though.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:33 PM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
Maybe I'm not up to date with Claesson. I thought he was turning into something. Sorry Dave. I may have voted without all the facts on this one.
I still don't like the first deal though.
|
I am 100% at peace with the rejected trade, that’s not my issue. My issue is that this trade is worse and should not be approved.
I think he can do better.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:34 PM
|
#18
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Meh, Claesson is young and on a bad team. Hell, even Karlsson sucks this year, Claesson will be fine. Happy to replace him if need be but I think this deal is more than fair
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 07:20 PM
|
#19
|
|
something else haha
|
Didn’t see a problem with the previous deal. I think this deal is worse but still seems fine. That 2nd is going to be the last pick in the 2nd.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Swayze11 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 09:42 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
|
I don't know what to vote.
I voted for a good deal last time and it got rejected. This is a worse deal IMHO and no disrespect. If we have a system to guide new GM's from making the same mistake each of us made in our first weeks then shouldn't we vote for the best for the new team and not vote against the team receiving
Don't get me wrong, I think getting a 2nd for Yandle would be a move I would be happy with, too bad the new team needs to wait two years before it gets picked.
I don't know what to vote, it's a good deal but the better one got shot down so, therefore, shouldn't this one. Its beocme common place that "I would have offered more" but the reality is most times it's not the case
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hanna Sniper For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 AM.
|
|
