View Poll Results: What do you think of the trade after a week of getting your head around it?
|
Love it, think Lucic is an upgrade
|
|
109 |
16.80% |
Like it, clears some cap space even if Lucic is no better
|
|
197 |
30.35% |
Indifferent, both teams getting a failed project
|
|
187 |
28.81% |
Dislike it, Neal needed another year to bounce back
|
|
107 |
16.49% |
Hate it, Neal will be better in Edmonton
|
|
49 |
7.55% |
07-19-2019, 04:23 PM
|
#741
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CN10
I have a feeling the deal blows up in Tre's face and we've just improved our rival, but I would love to be wrong. Hopefully the conditional pick is real and a good one and the owners use the cash savings between the rest of Neal and Lucic's contract term to improve the pro scouting to the point where we can avoid some of these bad fit UFA contracts that we have seen recently.
|
Trading them Neal will improved them? Honest question, how?
It's a garbage for trash, poo for dung trade.
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:23 PM
|
#742
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
736 post and not even finalized
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
__________________
In Treliving We Trust!
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:24 PM
|
#743
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Chaisson basically doubled his goal production going from the Flames (one year of Capitals in between) to the Oilers getting a career high 22 goals. I know Flames fans are going to cling to Neal not bouncing back but it's virtually a certainty that he in fact does that as he's going to benefit from playing with McDavid and having a top 6 role. This is why the deal is so bad because Lucic couldn't play top 6 with the Oilers and they got a player in return that can and will play top 6 for them.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:25 PM
|
#744
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
This is true.
Neal is looking for a 2nd chance this season after one bad season.
Lucic is looking for a 3rd chance to redeem himself. Most do not receive that (or deserve it).
Even when Lucic was tearing it up in Boston, he was the type of player that you knew would fall off earlier than most. It surprised no one that he hit 30 and collapsed.
|
3rd chance? He went to the Oilers as a UFA prize not a project. As bad as it's been good first season there was pretty solid
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:25 PM
|
#745
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
When others have labeled Lucic’s contract as “buy out proof”, this is what they mean:
If he is bought out next summer, his cap hits are:
20/21: $5,500,000
21/22: $4,000,000
22/23: $5,500,000
2023 through to end of 2026: $500,000
Bought out summer 2021:
21/22: $4,083,333
22/23: $5,583,333
2023 through to end of 2025: $583,333
Bought out summer 2022:
22/23: $5,333,333
23/24: $333,333
So, as you can see, a Lucic buyout offers negligible cap savings for his contract years.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:26 PM
|
#746
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
We're really putting the "better after Edmonton" theory to the test here.
History says it will hold true. Let's pray.
|
I know we bet on that with Talbot, but I didn't think we would immediately double-down with Lucic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOCH
(You all know you're gonna.)
|
Yup. Cheering for laundry. It's all about rooting for the clothes...
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:26 PM
|
#747
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I’m going to take the stance here that Lucic is better than Neal and that will be proven this coming season. While Neal May score more due to gifted minutes with McDavid, Lucic will make us a better team.
|
Players are gonna think twice about pushing around our small star playerswhen they got a 6'3" 235lb powerhouse with a short fuse to deal with
__________________
Marc Andre Fleury is the modern Patrick Roy
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheOnlyBilko For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:29 PM
|
#748
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJolg
3rd chance? He went to the Oilers as a UFA prize not a project. As bad as it's been good first season there was pretty solid
|
Lucic has had 2 terrible seasons in a row compared to Neal's 1.
So I guess it's more accurate to say Neal is looking for his first chance at redemption and Lucic is looking for his 2nd.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:29 PM
|
#749
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
McKenzie says no conditional pick
Bobby Margarita @TSNBobMcKenzie
I do feel obliged to say this: the Lucic-Neal CGY-EDM trade is one for one. ��
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:30 PM
|
#750
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOnlyBilko
Players are gonna think twice about pushing around our small star playerswhen they got a 6'3" 235lb powerhouse with a short fuse to deal with
|
Oh?
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:31 PM
|
#751
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by midniteowl
Trading them Neal will improved them? Honest question, how?
It's a garbage for trash, poo for dung trade.
|
It is a doofus for doofus trade, but I think the doofus we just sent them fits a team need for one of the leagues top offensive players in McDavid so I am worried that Neal recovers his 20G+ form as he can probably finish the plays he's set up for even better than Chiasson who went from around 10G to over 20G. Even if he plays 2nd line with RNH I think we can both agree that he will likely score more than he did with Jankowski and Bennett, while Lucic is unlikely to get anywhere close to reasonable production for a $5.4M cap hit.
Last edited by CN10; 07-19-2019 at 04:37 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CN10 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:31 PM
|
#752
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
When others have labeled Lucic’s contract as “buy out proof”, this is what they mean:
If he is bought out next summer, his cap hits are:
20/21: $5,500,000
21/22: $4,000,000
22/23: $5,500,000
2023 through to end of 2026: $500,000
Bought out summer 2021:
21/22: $4,083,333
22/23: $5,583,333
2023 through to end of 2025: $583,333
Bought out summer 2022:
22/23: $5,333,333
23/24: $333,333
So, as you can see, a Lucic buyout offers negligible cap savings for his contract years.
|
What was Chiarelli thinking when he made that deal? I think the Canucks were the other team interested in Lucic at the time but considering the player lost a step already at that time he should have been thinking about making the contract up so the last few years were somewhat buyout friendly.
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#753
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
What was Chiarelli thinking when he made that deal? I think the Canucks were the other team interested in Lucic at the time but considering the player lost a step already at that time he should have been thinking about making the contract up so the last few years were somewhat buyout friendly.
|
this was the cost of going to the Oilers.
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#754
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I think the whole draft pick rumour was just because people assumed there had to be something more coming back considering Lucic is a much bigger anchor and waste of space.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#755
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
When others have labeled Lucic’s contract as “buy out proof”, this is what they mean:
If he is bought out next summer, his cap hits are:
20/21: $5,500,000
21/22: $4,000,000
22/23: $5,500,000
2023 through to end of 2026: $500,000
Bought out summer 2021:
21/22: $4,083,333
22/23: $5,583,333
2023 through to end of 2025: $583,333
Bought out summer 2022:
22/23: $5,333,333
23/24: $333,333
So, as you can see, a Lucic buyout offers negligible cap savings for his contract years.
|
Flames owners weren't writing a 15 million dollar check to buyout Neal, so it doesn't matter to them.
The questions is do you help Edmonton with a potential buy out next year to save 7 million in real cash.
(Assuming both players are still useless next year which I essentially think they will be)
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#756
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cgy
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Chaisson basically doubled his goal production going from the Flames (one year of Capitals in between) to the Oilers getting a career high 22 goals. I know Flames fans are going to cling to Neal not bouncing back but it's virtually a certainty that he in fact does that as he's going to benefit from playing with McDavid and having a top 6 role. This is why the deal is so bad because Lucic couldn't play top 6 with the Oilers and they got a player in return that can and will play top 6 for them.
|
LOL then why didn't Tobias Reider have a career year? You can't just pick one guy going to Edmonton having a career year as being the norm for every guy going to Edm.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dienasty For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#757
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hyperbole Chamber
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphusk
Oh?
|
Yep, they're going to think about doing it again because Lucic was too slow to catch them the first time.
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#758
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
There has to be more to this.....Neal asking to be traded? Peter's scratching him? was it that bad?
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:32 PM
|
#759
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Chaisson basically doubled his goal production going from the Flames (one year of Capitals in between) to the Oilers getting a career high 22 goals. I know Flames fans are going to cling to Neal not bouncing back but it's virtually a certainty that he in fact does that as he's going to benefit from playing with McDavid and having a top 6 role. This is why the deal is so bad because Lucic couldn't play top 6 with the Oilers and they got a player in return that can and will play top 6 for them.
|
Neal did have some playing time in our top 6 and power play he was freaking awful I dont see how going to the Oilers will change that... he had his chances here he blew it
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 04:34 PM
|
#760
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
Flames owners weren't writing a 15 million dollar check to buyout Neal, so it doesn't matter to them.
The questions is do you help Edmonton with a potential buy out next year to save 7 million in real cash.
(Assuming both players are still useless next year which I essentially think they will be)
|
Right. But a buyout in Neal’s final year doesn’t cost $15mil and it gives you significant cap space when Johnny Gaudreau goes UFA.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 PM.
|
|