Quote:
Originally Posted by Love
Revisionist history. We were let down by poor goaltending and horrendous gaffs like that Grossman ones and phantom calls like McDavid's penalty shot call for a Wideman tap, when the Referees turned into Stevie Wonder on the other end when Larsson and Nugent Hopkins almost hacked the ribs off of Gaudreau
skip to 57:07 even in the commentators own words: "hooked from behind, no penalty called)
Even the Puljujarvi goal was weak. Questionable turnover under pressure by Engelland and laughable weak shot to allow by Elliott (a continuing theme that we'd see for the rest of the season)
So that's three out of seven goals allowed that were suspect, and then an empty netter to intensify the score even more.
We dominated them on the shot chart (41 to 28) and the faceoff dot (60% to 40%). Hits, blocked shots and giveaways were nearly identical. And they had 7 powerplays to our 4 (not counting that weak penalty shot call). It was a night where the refs wanted to be the stars of the show and we couldn't get the adequate goaltending or defending to do anything about it.
|
I'll agree that I may be misremembering how bad everyone else was in 7-4 and 5-3 losses, but it's also fair to say that nobody was really earning their contracts in the first couple nights of the season. Which is fine. We still would have lost at least one of those games, even without Niklas Grossman.
Unless we went 3-0 in the Grossman games, we couldn't have impacted our season. Our place in the standings is the same whether or not he ever suits up. Grossman didn't impact our cap, at all. He was an embarrassing footnote. That's all he was.