Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2019, 10:37 PM   #81
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
It actually requires corn.
Limestone
rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rhino For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2019, 05:09 AM   #82
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
So, what part don't you agree with? Do you disagree that Ferland's career looks to be in jeopardy? Do you disagree that it was nice for him to earn one more big contract before he is forced into retirement?

I don't get it.
Op mistyped, I think.
They wrote "happy he received that contact" and everybody read contract.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
Happy for him that he got that contact. It looks like he is close to done.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 05:37 AM   #83
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Here's a flashback.



Check out the Flames' Top Five Prospects at the time....
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 05:52 AM   #84
foofighter15
#1 Goaltender
 
foofighter15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: EASHL Locker Room
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Here's a flashback.



Check out the Flames' Top Five Prospects at the time....
Well... at least they were right to rate Brodie 1st out of that bunch....
foofighter15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 06:24 AM   #85
crapshoot
First Line Centre
 
crapshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foofighter15 View Post
Well... at least they were right to rate Brodie 1st out of that bunch....

Max Reinhart looked like a really, really good prospect after his 2010-11 season though. The others were already fairly underwhelming at that point in time as I recall.
crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 06:31 AM   #86
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Here's a flashback.



Check out the Flames' Top Five Prospects at the time....
That's a reminder of the Darryl Sutter decade of drafting. Brodie and Backlund and a whole lot of junk for the most part.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 07:34 AM   #87
foofighter15
#1 Goaltender
 
foofighter15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: EASHL Locker Room
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crapshoot View Post
Max Reinhart looked like a really, really good prospect after his 2010-11 season though. The others were already fairly underwhelming at that point in time as I recall.
I had high hopes for Max too, and even Leland Irving. Its always mind blowing when you look at how many more flops there are than one who stick. But that's the business.
foofighter15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 07:39 AM   #88
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
As much as we love Mangiapane, he has 23 points in 87 games. He is a ~0.3 points per game guy both this year and last.

Baertschi has put up a serviceable 0.5 points per game the last 3 seasons.

If Mangiapane continues to develop, he should hopefully have a higher ceiling.

But right now people love him for his potential, more so than his results.

Also, on the topic of players relevant to Sven, Rasmus is shaping up quite nicely
Not when you take into account opportunity.

Baertschi in in Vancouver career has been a 1.60 Points/60 player.

Mangiapane was 1.79 last year and 1.53 this year ... for 1.67/60 in the last two seasons.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 07:51 AM   #89
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Not when you take into account opportunity.

Baertschi in in Vancouver career has been a 1.60 Points/60 player.

Mangiapane was 1.79 last year and 1.53 this year ... for 1.67/60 in the last two seasons.
So you are saying they are roughly comparable, by that metric, and slight edge to Mangiapane at the moment.

I see the per 60 used a lot in support of guys with limited ice time

Honest question. How well does it generally scale? An increase in ice time potentially can result in an increase in quality of competition. (More ice time is allocated to better lines, and they receive more attention from the opposition)
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 08:31 AM   #90
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
So you are saying they are roughly comparable, by that metric, and slight edge to Mangiapane at the moment.

I see the per 60 used a lot in support of guys with limited ice time

Honest question. How well does it generally scale? An increase in ice time potentially can result in an increase in quality of competition. (More ice time is allocated to better lines, and they receive more attention from the opposition)
Absolutely ... it's not a straight line

But then either is points per game when players play a different average of minutes per game.

I think in this case it works though. His production is off this year for sure, but it hasn't flat lined and he's getting way fiercer quality of opposition.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 08:35 AM   #91
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Here's a weird/ maybe interesting proposition:

If we clear out some of our wingers (frolik, bennett, mangiapane) in a hall trade, could we pick sven up to fill that role?
I am really struggling to understand the thought processes required to believe that a Hall trade centred around giving up our junk + Mangiapane is feasible, or to believe that picking up Baertschi is in any way a useful move.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 08:36 AM   #92
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Not when you take into account opportunity.

Baertschi in in Vancouver career has been a 1.60 Points/60 player.

Mangiapane was 1.79 last year and 1.53 this year ... for 1.67/60 in the last two seasons.
Mangiapane is also a sixth round pick. That he's even in the show is a win.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 09:01 AM   #93
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Wow, dead on with that Loui Eriksson comparable. He didn't quite live up to the 6M wasted cap space on the Canucks that Loui is, but 3.3M of wasted salary is nothing to scoff at.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2019, 09:07 AM   #94
Rando
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
Rasmus Andersson is easily a 1st round talent if they redid his draft year, so we did quite alright with Baertschi eventually. I'm more than happy on what we got for him.
The 2015 draft is turning out to be an absolute killer, he might not.

Everyone seemed to make out well. Calgary traded away three picks in the first two rounds and still drafted Andersson, Kylington and Mangipane. Edmonton nabbed Ethan Bear in the 5th while somehow managing to snag Connor McDavid 1st overall.

The funniest thing about that whole draft is Boston Jakub Zbori, Jake DeBrusk and Zachary Senyshyn 13th, 14th and 15th while Matthew Barzel, Kyle Connor and Thomas Chabot were picked 16th 17th and 18th.

Ouch.
Rando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 09:08 AM   #95
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Boston missed out on a dynasty by being too cute with that draft.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2019, 09:08 AM   #96
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Mangiapane is also a sixth round pick. That he's even in the show is a win.
Mangiapane also makes $715K. Sven makes $3M+.

On the PP/60 topic, it's obviously not scalable easily - quality of opposition/quality of linemates, plus effectiveness at a certain number of minutes all plays into it.

And then you have to add in the non-scoring play. I haven't watched Sven for a while, but I hated his play in his own zone and on the forecheck (he always got to the puck a hair late and on the wrong side of the puck, so he never won a puck battle). Mangiapane is pretty good on the forecheck and I never notice a bad defensive play.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 09:15 AM   #97
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I’d agree. I was at a skate in Baertschi’s career and chatting with Conroy and he was raving about his compete level.

Something got broken with the kid, he just couldn’t sustain it consistently at the NHL level
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 09:37 AM   #98
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh View Post
1) Lol, clearly wrong
Despite those savings with Schaller, they’re already being realized with Baertschi. Nothing gained. Further Schaller has a caphit of $1.9, Baertschi 3.3, with under a $100k in cap room.
Okay, let me be really clear because apparently this is difficult to grasp for some people.

If you are swapping a player on your NHL roster for a guy on your AHL roster, and both players make more than 1.075M, the exchange has no impact whatsoever on your cap situation. It does not matter that one player makes more than the other.

Because both players make over 1.075M, if they were to call up Baertschi and send down Schaller, the total cap space of the Canucks would be exactly the same as it is now.
Quote:
2) You’re clearly not watching him play, when you suggest defensive winger.
I didn't. I suggested 3rd line scoring winger, which is pretty much what he is, and that the Canucks have room for one of those because their third line is more of a scoring line than a checking line. All in all, they'd be better with him in the lineup than Schaller. Not that it's the difference between them being the mediocre team they are and actually being good, mind you.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 09:55 AM   #99
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Wow, dead on with that Loui Eriksson comparable. He didn't quite live up to the 6M wasted cap space on the Canucks that Loui is, but 3.3M of wasted salary is nothing to scoff at.
Take three or four concussions off either guy's brain and I'm certain they're not viewed as misfit toys across the league.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2019, 10:02 AM   #100
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Sven Baertschi (VAN) clears waivers.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021