Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2024, 11:48 AM   #21
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I am a big fan of trying to take on a cap dump that expires in 2025 if we are getting a good return with future assets.
Right.

Did we learn nothing from the Monahan trade? Target teams with cap issues (there will still be some even if the cap goes up), and take on an underperforming contract for picks. Can't have enough in a rebui....er....re-tool.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 11:49 AM   #22
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

1 year deals on over priced C's and try to trade for guys in the last year of their deal. See if Carolina will give up anything to take Orlov, the give him every chance to raise his value.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:00 PM   #23
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
The best thing they can do this off season to weaponize cap space is what Chicago and Arizona have done, which is to sign guys to one year “show me” deals with the intent of moving them to a contender at the trade deadline.

Give a vet or two ample opportunity to produce and then ship them off. Guys would are looking for big-money deals but don’t find a home would be good for it as well
This. Absolutely this. Do the same until 2026 when the new arena opens, and as we accrue more picks. I don't think they should make any big moves in free agency for at least 2-3 seasons. Only these short term "show me" deals.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:03 PM   #24
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Sign cup chasing veterans to one-year deals who can't catch on with a contender, then trade them to a contender at the deadline.

Kind of like what Buffalo did when they signed Hall and traded him to Boston at the deadline for a 2nd and a younger roster player.

Philly used this tactic before as well.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:07 PM   #25
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Thankfully the UFA market is going to be so sparse that even if the Flames wanted to load up on UFAs, there just isn't much there to tempt them.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:10 PM   #26
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

I'd rather sign UFAs to one year contracts for slightly above market value and retain at the deadline than be a 3rd party broker

I can see us getting 2nd or 3rd (maybe even a 1st) round pick doing this instead of 4th and 5th round picks
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:16 PM   #27
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser View Post
With only Kylington & Pelletier to re-sign, we are looking at having $15M+ in cap space next season. If we trade Markstrom, this will likely be close to $20M.

How can the Flames best capitalize on this?

In typical Flames fashion, the cap is going up by $4M next year, giving lots of teams some breathing room and reducing the value of cap space. Regardless, I am sure there are still a number of teams that will be cash strapped and may need to bury some bodies elsewhere.

Looking for some creative thoughts and speculation as to what the Flames can do to acquire some assets.
Typical unfortunate timing.

However, teams are still going to be strapped, and the extra $4M is going to get used up very quickly, as many players have been holding off, waiting for the cap to go up, before they go for big contracts.

Pettersson getting $11.6M is indicative of this. Contracts are just going to be that much bigger this year, due to the extra $4m, and everyone will be a the cap right away again.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 12:18 PM   #28
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

"be like Arizona"
might be the worst advice ever

they have been rebuilding for 100 years and are still ####ing terrible
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:29 PM   #29
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
"be like Arizona"
might be the worst advice ever

they have been rebuilding for 100 years and are still ####ing terrible
plus the strategy of signing veterans to 1 year show me deals sputtered out this season...

Zucker signed for $5.3 million --> 6th round pick
Dumba signed for $3.9 million -> 5th round pick in 2027 and they also had ship out a 2025 7th

Stecher got a decent pick, but that was because he had such a low cap hit and was one of the few veteran d-men that Edmonton could fit in their remaining cap space. Flames picked him up for basically no asset cost last season.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 12:34 PM   #30
CFO
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

Flames should target 1st and 2nds that are 3-4 years out for short term cap dumps. Then take these pics in a few years and go hard at any elite young RFA's for offersheets.
CFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:37 PM   #31
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
"be like Arizona"
might be the worst advice ever

they have been rebuilding for 100 years and are still ####ing terrible
You post this like the Flames have a choice. What is your plan for a small market team that no one wants to play for?
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:39 PM   #32
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO View Post
Flames should target 1st and 2nds that are 3-4 years out for short term cap dumps. Then take these pics in a few years and go hard at any elite young RFA's for offersheets.
Has an offer sheet ever worked out long term for the team making it?
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:40 PM   #33
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Maybe we can 'pull a Monahan' and take someone's overpaid centre along with a first round pick, only for that centre to actually turn out to be ####ing awesome and then later traded for ANOTHER first round pick
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:42 PM   #34
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
You post this like the Flames have a choice. What is your plan for a small market team that no one wants to play for?
Lots of people want to play here.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 01:04 PM   #35
Funkhouser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Funkhouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
plus the strategy of signing veterans to 1 year show me deals sputtered out this season...

Zucker signed for $5.3 million --> 6th round pick
Dumba signed for $3.9 million -> 5th round pick in 2027 and they also had ship out a 2025 7th

Stecher got a decent pick, but that was because he had such a low cap hit and was one of the few veteran d-men that Edmonton could fit in their remaining cap space. Flames picked him up for basically no asset cost last season.

This is a good point. In no world is a 6th round pick worth $5M.
Like I suggested, what is a full season of _______ worth?
-Mangiapane @ $2.9M (costs the Flames $2.9M)
-Kuzmenko @ $2.75M (costs the Flames $2.75M)
-Coleman @ $2.45M for 3 seasons (costs the Flames $7.3M)

Instead of taking on overpaid UFAs and unloading them for low picks, we should be retaining on our own future UFAs and unloading them at the start of the season to teams in a cap crunch.

Mangiapane & Kuzmenko to Avalanche for a 1st.
Coleman to Dallas for Bourque & a 1st
Markstrom (no retention) and Mangiapane to Leafs for 2024 1st, Minten & Reaves

Last edited by Funkhouser; 03-11-2024 at 01:07 PM.
Funkhouser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 01:11 PM   #36
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

This is the Calgary Flames we're talking about... the last time they were in this situation they used it to give overpayments on multi-year deals to Mason Raymond, Matt Stajan, & Derek Engellend.

Let's just say that my expectations are low.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 01:19 PM   #37
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Call it a hunch but get ready for the Chandler Stephenson overpay.
I think there's unfortunately going to be some truth to the "retooling" talk.

Hope I'm wrong, but I see the Flames offering a couple of $6mllion x 4+ year contracts.

My guess is Anthony Duclair and Brandon Montour. They'll try to bring back the Huberdeau band.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 01:21 PM   #38
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Agree to find a Monahanish player to take on with 1 or 2 seasons left for a 1st rounder.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 01:33 PM   #39
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Re-sign Monahan to a giant contract and then give up another 1st round pick to get rid of it.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 01:34 PM   #40
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
I think there's unfortunately going to be some truth to the "retooling" talk.

Hope I'm wrong, but I see the Flames offering a couple of $6mllion x 4+ year contracts.

My guess is Anthony Duclair and Brandon Montour. They'll try to bring back the Huberdeau band.
I could see Montour easily. I'd be fine with Duclair on a 1 or 2 year deal, nothing more than $3 million per. He is just way too fragile and inconsistent.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021