Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-17-2018, 04:46 PM   #201
3thirty
#1 Goaltender
 
3thirty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Back in Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
It depends, do we seriously upgrade our offense in the process and become a bigger threat in the next two seasons during the primes of our star young players? Or do we wait for him to possibly be a star three or four years from now when Gaudreau's set to be a free agent?

If we was a regular prospect than yeah, I'd be very tentative about a trade, but the NCAA flight risk is a valid concern and especially so with a Harvard student.

I know the rosy idea is that the Flames are a great organization and he's a good kid who will want to play here because he's been at camps and said the right things. End of the day though, the NHL is a business and if after four years his options are

1. Sign with team who drafted him or;

2. Wait two months and sign with any team in the league in what's sure to be a bidding war.

He'd be absolutely crazy not to take number two.
While I agree with most of this, the only luxury is he can choose who he plays for. The contracts will all be the same assuming max.
3thirty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 04:50 PM   #202
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Hickey was a lesser prospect, and they did mention quite frequently that the reason he was included was because of the flight risk.

Also, he was not leaked to the media as a available, just traded, so there was no chance for the media to say anything pre trade. Of course the Flames would let it be known league wide if a prospect of this caliber was available, and of course the media would jump on the NCAA factor.
I'm trying to recollect the timing of Trelving saying he wasn't going to sign, I think it may have been after the trade, but there was speculation from the local media guys that he wasn't signing before hand. It kind of ramped up after the season ended when Trelving was saying they were going all out to get him signed early.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 04:50 PM   #203
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

@ thirty ^^^^^^^^

Correct yes, I got a little over excited typing that post out, lol. He can only sign for the max and Calgary would be signing him for the max anyways, so it's a moot point.

It puts every team on even playing terms and the best teams in the east will hold the power.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 06:00 PM   #204
JJFlash
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

I never heard why he was not invited to play in the Olympics or if he was, why did he turn it down. I am not sure players need to tell teams what the want to hear when they are in a position like fox. I think the Flames have a really good idea of Fox's intentions. If the Flames suddenly trade one of their stud Defenders or Defender prospects...we have our answer. There is no better time for a smallish skilled defender than now.
JJFlash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 07:21 PM   #205
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
I think the Flames have a really good idea of Fox's intentions.
Based on what?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 04:12 AM   #206
nemanja2306
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Exp:
Default

The thing is, if the Flames start offering Fox, the other teams will probably know that Fox has not intention of signing with the Flames. That greatly reduces his trade value - would you give up a lot for a prospect that has a great chance of being a flight risk?
nemanja2306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 05:05 AM   #207
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

The NHL needs to get this loophole closed. Maybe they should've traded that for Olympic participation.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 06:42 AM   #208
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
If I am Fox, I know I am going to prefer signing somewhere else. Why? Look at the depth the Flames have on defence.
Flames depth on defense is something to consider, but if I'm Fox I'm more concerned about opportunity to show I can play, period. The Flames are proud of their "over cook prospects" strategy. I'm sure Fox is aware of it too. I'm also sure that he agency (currently known as advisors) is aware of this and will be telling his client to look at the treatment of the many college players that signed with the Flames of late, like Kenney Morrison and Spencer Foo, just as a couple of examples. It doesn't take a Harvard economist to figure out the difference between earning a minor league salary and earning a NHL salary, and how that money will never be recouped. Opportunity will be a big driver, and the Flames are a team that have a history of not providing opportunity until their hand is forced. I hope Fox signs with the Flames, but because of this loophole, I'm not certain that is going to happen. This is one of the few times where players can control their destiny from the get-go. There is no benefit to the player in not going to free agency.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 07:21 AM   #209
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
I never heard why he was not invited to play in the Olympics or if he was, why did he turn it down. I am not sure players need to tell teams what the want to hear when they are in a position like fox. I think the Flames have a really good idea of Fox's intentions. If the Flames suddenly trade one of their stud Defenders or Defender prospects...we have our answer. There is no better time for a smallish skilled defender than now.
Fox isn't the greatest skater. I could see that being a concern on the bigger ice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Two Fivenagame View Post
Fox has to be looking at the Flames RD depth wondering where/if he fits.

The Ham's have #1 and #2 RD locked up and Rasmus is already knocking on the door.

What else is there for Fox in the NCAA? Sounds like Harvard is only going to get worse, so likely no chance at a national title.

Maybe he signs at end of this season, turns pro and gets a head start developing his pro game in the AHL.

Interesting prospect to watch.
Th difference between Fox and all the other Flames d-propsects is he immediately become the best PP defenseman on the team as soon as he signs a contract. That gives him an edge on the other guys who may be better 5 on 5.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 07:24 AM   #210
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Fox isn't the greatest skater. I could see that being a concern on the bigger ice.



Th difference between Fox and all the other Flames d-propsects is he immediately become the best PP defenseman on the team as soon as he signs a contract. That gives him an edge on the other guys who may be better 5 on 5.
Hamilton is currently our best PP guy yet hadn't seen proper usage for the longest time, I don't have the best faith that it'll slide into his advantage immediately.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 08:49 AM   #211
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Fox isn't the greatest skater. I could see that being a concern on the bigger ice.



Th difference between Fox and all the other Flames d-propsects is he immediately become the best PP defenseman on the team as soon as he signs a contract. That gives him an edge on the other guys who may be better 5 on 5.
Hamilton quarterbacked the Canadian PP at the WJs as well. And he has 6 years and 400 games of NHL experience on top of that.

Fox is a great prospect but the way fans overvalue prospects in relation to actual NHL players, never ceases to amaze me.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 09:26 AM   #212
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I can't believe the NHL has not fixed that stupid loophole that allows college players to go UFA. It is just wrong.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 09:31 AM   #213
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I can't believe the NHL has not fixed that stupid loophole that allows college players to go UFA.
...because it's not a loophole.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 09:33 AM   #214
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
...because it's not a loophole.
It is ridiculous.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 09:36 AM   #215
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I can't believe the NHLPA has not fixed that stupid loophole that allows teams to not sign players that they drafted if the player doesn't have a great college career. It is just wrong.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 09:37 AM   #216
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
I can't believe the NHLPA has not fixed that stupid loophole that allows teams to not sign players that they drafted if the player doesn't have a great college career. It is just wrong.
It is ridiculous.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 09:42 AM   #217
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
It is ridiculous.
No, it's not.

What's ridiculous is people's attitude. Once upon a time the "loophole" folk whining about (Also not a "loophole") was teams losing exclusive negotiating rights a year before graduation if the player had a gap year and played an extra year of prep level hockey... now it's a "loophole" when the exclusivity window expires per usual time at graduation?

Stop calling it a loophole. The way it works is the way it is intended to work.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 09:48 AM   #218
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I can't believe the NHL has not fixed that stupid loophole that allows college players to go UFA. It is just wrong.
What's the solution? The team gets 30 days after their college career to sign them. If they REALLY want the player that it's tempted to test the UFA market, then pay that man to keep him around.

If the team didn't want him, but rules were in place that he couldn't freely sign with anyone else that has interest for say, a whole year, that's not really fair to the player.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
Old 02-19-2018, 09:52 AM   #219
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Flames depth on defense is something to consider, but if I'm Fox I'm more concerned about opportunity to show I can play, period. The Flames are proud of their "over cook prospects" strategy. I'm sure Fox is aware of it too. I'm also sure that he agency (currently known as advisors) is aware of this and will be telling his client to look at the treatment of the many college players that signed with the Flames of late, like Kenney Morrison and Spencer Foo, just as a couple of examples. It doesn't take a Harvard economist to figure out the difference between earning a minor league salary and earning a NHL salary, and how that money will never be recouped. Opportunity will be a big driver, and the Flames are a team that have a history of not providing opportunity until their hand is forced. I hope Fox signs with the Flames, but because of this loophole, I'm not certain that is going to happen. This is one of the few times where players can control their destiny from the get-go. There is no benefit to the player in not going to free agency.
You don't think agents are smart enough to see that Kenney Morrison isn't good enough to be on an NHL roster?

That Spencer Foo looked a little overwhelmed at camp and needed seasoning?

These guys are advisors and are well educated on the percentages for their clients when they sign.

Neither of those guys would have made any NHL roster.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 09:52 AM   #220
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

They should probably just make it similar to RFA rules. Makes no sense that they get to go right to UFA.

If you offer your own draft pick the Rookie Maximum contract (think of this as the qualifying offer) then he either has to sign with you or you retain his RFA rights.

Another team can still sign him but would have to pay a pre-determined compensation (Maybe it's a 2nd round pick).

Then at least the team gets something in return, the other team has to give up something, and it's less about just allowing a player to pick his own team.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021