View Poll Results: Should this trade pass?
|
yes
|
|
10 |
45.45% |
no
|
|
12 |
54.55% |
01-30-2018, 06:53 PM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
|
Rangers deal for review
Team: San Jose Sharks
- 2018 2nd Round Draft Choice (tb)
Team: New York Rangers
- Yandle, Keith (D) NHL
Terms: sharks get 7m
Last edited by Jiri Hrdina; 01-30-2018 at 11:32 PM.
|
|
|
01-30-2018, 06:54 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
Yandle is a 71 OVR dman. Feels like he should fetch more than a 2nd.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-30-2018, 07:50 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
A 2nd and a prospect would be better
|
|
|
01-30-2018, 10:48 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
|
He's 30 and needs a grid, but had been a very consistent producer on the back end and has top pairing minutes and PP duties in Florida. I also think he's worth more.
|
|
|
01-30-2018, 10:54 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
|
UFA with a 7 million cap hit with no cap changing hands?
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
|
|
|
01-30-2018, 11:32 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
Not sure why it didn’t show up when I pasted the deal but the Rangers are also sending 7m
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 12:25 AM
|
#7
|
Uncle Chester
|
Yandle for a 2nd? I had to vote no and I rarely vote no.
SJ should add in my opinion.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 06:14 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Voted yes.
SJ could probably add more but far from a terrible valuation in my eyes
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DropIt For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-31-2018, 07:01 AM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Sorry everyone, no chance I add something to a good 2018 2nd for a 40 game rental, ain't happening. The way this league works it's possible he could draft a 1st rounder with that pick.
If the majority vote is NO someone better step up and offer him a good 2nd + prospect otherwise he will get no return on Yandle and will be stuck to either let him go for nothing or forced to sign him to a new 3 year 1-way deal. Not ideal.
And if the prospect everyone is talking about is going to be just an average guy anyways why on earth would you vote no?
Last edited by MJK; 01-31-2018 at 07:07 AM.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 07:12 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM
Not sure why it didn’t show up when I pasted the deal but the Rangers are also sending 7m
|
To clarify it's $7Mill to cover his salary this year, there is no cash for next year.
I have no plans to sign him, he's a 40 game rental to try and give Doug something to work with, my D is horrible.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 07:44 AM
|
#11
|
Uncle Chester
|
That's what she said?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-31-2018, 08:55 AM
|
#12
|
something else haha
|
Yandle is a pending UFA, you shouldnt really be getting much more than a 2nd. Voted yes
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 09:03 AM
|
#13
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I pushed for + prospect as well, but agreed that he's a UFA end of season, and he's brutal on my d line for defense (+/-) (surprise surprise)
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 09:12 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
Is anyone willing to give manwiches a 2018 2nd and a good prospect for Yandle? If so, please speak up so if this gets a majority NO vote, he will have another deal lined up.
Prospect would have to be good based on comments here because there is no reason to vote no if the difference is an average prospect.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:22 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
|
I tried like a bugger last season to get a 2nd round pick for Lucic, ended up trading him for a depth player at the deadline because I wasnt able to find a buyer
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hanna Sniper For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-31-2018, 12:57 PM
|
#16
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
C'mon... someone offer a prospect + 2nd....
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to manwiches For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-31-2018, 05:07 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
GMs involved in the deal should not be voting. So vote is 11-5. Will give it a bit more time.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 06:27 PM
|
#18
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
SJ is in the lower portion of the standings, its a high second rounder to a rebuilding team for a rental UFA for a potential playoff push? it fits the needs of both teams? values not perfect but in line with goals.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Completely For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-31-2018, 06:31 PM
|
#19
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
This deal doesn't make a lot of sense. Voted no.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 07:11 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
|
You can go ahead and close it down, I’ll keep my 2nd. Sorry manwiches, I just don’t agree with some here that I should add a good prospect as well.
Hope you find a trading partner that will pay up, I recommend reaching out to anyone that voted No first and go from there. You should get your 2nd and good prospect from one of them.
Good luck.
Last edited by MJK; 01-31-2018 at 07:18 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 PM.
|
|