Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2022, 02:04 PM   #1
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default [Poll Request] Monahan Off-Season Trade Value (or negative value)

This discussion pervades nearly every other thread, so 1 more can't hurt, and I think a poll would be interesting.

Presuming a move in the off-season with no retention. I suspect an eventual deal will involve a few players/prospects/picks so we can forever argue about the details, but in pure draft pick terms, I propose the following options:

1. Returns a 2nd or better
2. Returns a 3rd-5th
3. Negligible assets included either way (6th/7th/C-level prospects/future considerations)
4. Sweetened with a 3rd-5th
5. Sweetened with a 2nd
6. Sweetened with a 1st or better, traded with retention, or buy out


I'll offer some historical comparables for anyone looking to make an informed decision :

Spoiler!
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:05 PM   #2
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I don't see how the Flames don't give up at least a second. If the Flames manage to retain both of Gaudreau and Tkachuk, I imagine it's a 1st.

The Flames had to give up a 4th to give away half a season of Pitlick at $1.75MM.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:10 PM   #3
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Mathgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't be surprised if it takes a sweetener of a 2nd plus a 5th to move his contract.

That said, if he stays here for this year's playoffs and has a good showing, the sweetener amount reduces somewhat.
__________________
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:11 PM   #4
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Too soon to say. A big playoff could change the answers given today considering this is a question for the offseason
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:14 PM   #5
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.

I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
__________________
"We don't even know who our best player is yet. It could be any one of us at this point." - Peter LaFleur, player/coach, Average Joe's Gymnasium
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:20 PM   #6
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.

I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
The real question is who starts the Legend thread.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:21 PM   #7
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I don't see how the Flames don't give up at least a second. If the Flames manage to retain both of Gaudreau and Tkachuk, I imagine it's a 1st.

The Flames had to give up a 4th to give away half a season of Pitlick at $1.75MM.
I don't think there is any chance the Flames give up a first to move one year of Monahan.

Maybe Monahan and a first for an asset the Flames actually want
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:21 PM   #8
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

because the options don't have anything to say about cap ( the primary reason to move Monahan) I am not going to participate.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:27 PM   #9
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Monahan is staying.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:28 PM   #10
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Mathgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.

I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
Yep. CPers just want someone to pick on. That's why Monahan is getting criticism. No other reason at all. His play this year isn't deserving of criticism at all. Got it.
__________________

Last edited by Mathgod; 03-15-2022 at 03:16 PM. Reason: Didn't think green text was needed, but you never know...
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:29 PM   #11
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
Monahan is staying.
My thoughts exactly. At least for this playoff run...winning faceoffs is actually a thing...
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:31 PM   #12
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.

He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one

He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,

Likely have to add to make a deal
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:32 PM   #13
FlamingHomer
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FlamingHomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Republic of Panama
Exp:
Default

His value is way too low. I think you need to give him another year here and see if he can regain at least some of his talent.
__________________
Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.
FlamingHomer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamingHomer For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:33 PM   #14
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.

He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one

He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,

Likely have to add to make a deal
The only thing is - that keeps being said about players around the league and yet I can only recall a couple instances where teams had to add to make a cap trade.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:35 PM   #15
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:36 PM   #16
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.

He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one

He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,

Likely have to add to make a deal
There are a bunch of teams where the cap isn't all that critical, especially when they move pieces out to tank for Bedard
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:37 PM   #17
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Mathgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
Those $2M will be crucial if this team plans to re-sign all 4 big FAs long term.
__________________
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mathgod For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 02:37 PM   #18
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

I can't see how one can predict this now, because while he clearly has negative value now, his playoff performance can and will effect that value.

If that cost ends up a first round pick, I can't imagine the Flames pay that price. They'd prefer to move out Mangiapane for a first round pick than lose one.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:39 PM   #19
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
There are a bunch of teams where the cap isn't all that critical, especially when they move pieces out to tank for Bedard
The cap may not be that critical, but it doesn't mean they take on unwanted cap for no cost. Arizona for one has shown they will you give them enough draft capital to do so.

But agains, let's see how the year plays out, he might have a great playoff.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:39 PM   #20
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
Buyout is better. Retention is better still. But buyout doesn't require a partner.

Maybe Treliving can pull a draft day deal by trading down plus Monahan.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021