03-15-2022, 02:04 PM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
|
[Poll Request] Monahan Off-Season Trade Value (or negative value)
This discussion pervades nearly every other thread, so 1 more can't hurt, and I think a poll would be interesting.
Presuming a move in the off-season with no retention. I suspect an eventual deal will involve a few players/prospects/picks so we can forever argue about the details, but in pure draft pick terms, I propose the following options:
1. Returns a 2nd or better
2. Returns a 3rd-5th
3. Negligible assets included either way (6th/7th/C-level prospects/future considerations)
4. Sweetened with a 3rd-5th
5. Sweetened with a 2nd
6. Sweetened with a 1st or better, traded with retention, or buy out
I'll offer some historical comparables for anyone looking to make an informed decision :
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:05 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't see how the Flames don't give up at least a second. If the Flames manage to retain both of Gaudreau and Tkachuk, I imagine it's a 1st.
The Flames had to give up a 4th to give away half a season of Pitlick at $1.75MM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:10 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Wouldn't be surprised if it takes a sweetener of a 2nd plus a 5th to move his contract.
That said, if he stays here for this year's playoffs and has a good showing, the sweetener amount reduces somewhat.
__________________
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:11 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Too soon to say. A big playoff could change the answers given today considering this is a question for the offseason
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
BoLevi,
CSharp,
Erick Estrada,
foofighter15,
getbak,
GioforPM,
GreenHardHat,
Jetfire,
kkaleR,
Loudog,
P-DAZZLE,
powderjunkie,
Press Level,
Scroopy Noopers,
Stillman16,
The Cobra,
trackercowe
|
03-15-2022, 02:14 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.
I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
__________________
"We don't even know who our best player is yet. It could be any one of us at this point." - Peter LaFleur, player/coach, Average Joe's Gymnasium
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:20 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.
I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
|
The real question is who starts the Legend thread.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:21 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
I don't see how the Flames don't give up at least a second. If the Flames manage to retain both of Gaudreau and Tkachuk, I imagine it's a 1st.
The Flames had to give up a 4th to give away half a season of Pitlick at $1.75MM.
|
I don't think there is any chance the Flames give up a first to move one year of Monahan.
Maybe Monahan and a first for an asset the Flames actually want
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:21 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
because the options don't have anything to say about cap ( the primary reason to move Monahan) I am not going to participate.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:27 PM
|
#9
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Monahan is staying.
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:28 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I'm morbidly curious as to how this poll would pan out. There is a hardcore group on here that have been Monahan detractors for a full season, and that has to wear on the general CP reader. I think that other markets see Monahan as having more value than most CPers, because Calgary fanbases love to have one player in the doghouse at all times.
I'm worried about the eventual Monahan trade, because I already see the CP stirrings of the heir apparent to be crapped on as the next Flames 'failure', and I'd rather Monahan stay around as the heel we know.
|
Yep. CPers just want someone to pick on. That's why Monahan is getting criticism. No other reason at all. His play this year isn't deserving of criticism at all. Got it.
__________________
Last edited by Mathgod; 03-15-2022 at 03:16 PM.
Reason: Didn't think green text was needed, but you never know...
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:29 PM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
Monahan is staying.
|
My thoughts exactly. At least for this playoff run...winning faceoffs is actually a thing...
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:31 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.
He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one
He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,
Likely have to add to make a deal
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:32 PM
|
#13
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Republic of Panama
|
His value is way too low. I think you need to give him another year here and see if he can regain at least some of his talent.
__________________
Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamingHomer For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:33 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.
He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one
He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,
Likely have to add to make a deal
|
The only thing is - that keeps being said about players around the league and yet I can only recall a couple instances where teams had to add to make a cap trade.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:35 PM
|
#15
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:36 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
With how critical cap is to every team, Monahan has negative value.
He has a $6.375m cap hit, with another year after this one
He is currently a depth player on the Flames roster,
Likely have to add to make a deal
|
There are a bunch of teams where the cap isn't all that critical, especially when they move pieces out to tank for Bedard
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:37 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
|
Those $2M will be crucial if this team plans to re-sign all 4 big FAs long term.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mathgod For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:37 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
I can't see how one can predict this now, because while he clearly has negative value now, his playoff performance can and will effect that value.
If that cost ends up a first round pick, I can't imagine the Flames pay that price. They'd prefer to move out Mangiapane for a first round pick than lose one.
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:39 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
There are a bunch of teams where the cap isn't all that critical, especially when they move pieces out to tank for Bedard
|
The cap may not be that critical, but it doesn't mean they take on unwanted cap for no cost. Arizona for one has shown they will you give them enough draft capital to do so.
But agains, let's see how the year plays out, he might have a great playoff.
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 02:39 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Isn't a buyout a better option than sending back a big asset or taking back a contract? The Flames add on another $2 million in 2023/24 but it saves 4 million next year.
|
Buyout is better. Retention is better still. But buyout doesn't require a partner.
Maybe Treliving can pull a draft day deal by trading down plus Monahan.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 PM.
|
|