Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-13-2019, 11:38 PM   #81
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Is the leverage on a trade any better now with the team floundering out of gate than it was in the off-season?
Boyle or Williams would be “free”, so the required move of a salary away to fit the $700-$1M salary in, Frolik as the easy, yet not only option, would be for a draft pick, and not as part of a package for a Jason Zucker. So yes, leverage would be lost as far as the return, but only due to the Flames cap situation.

It’s not ideal situation, but in those 2 guys cases, it brings another vet elements., The Flames crapped the bed against Pittsburgh last Oct 25, with no material changes...so still some time to sort this out, but as said, I don’t think BT is waiting as long as he did last year, given it’s not a new coach, nor has the roster turned over as much...and the window is a year closer.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2019, 11:38 PM   #82
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Homer View Post
Frolik- no trade value
Ryan- negative trade value
Bennett- could get possibly a 3rd
Jankowski- would clear waivers
Mangiapane- probably the most value of what you listed because he’s unproven and has room to grow.
Janko was already traded if Kadri would have waived...he would not clear

Bennett is the most valuable and could fetch more than a 3rd
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2019, 11:39 PM   #83
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Homer View Post
It’s not about the points. I’ve also never been a “the sky is falling” guy either. What I see is an absolute total lack of effort all around. We have a bottom six full of tweeners that last seasons success allowed us to overlook. and is becoming pretty apparent. You guys can paint it however you want to feel better about it. But the fact is we’re not good enough after our top 5 players. If the top line isn’t hot we lose. It’s not something that can be argued or even has a small sample size to be an anomaly. Major stretches last season. Our entire first round against Colorado and the whole start of this season...
I will call this exactly what it is: premature panic to a disappointing start.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2019, 11:43 PM   #84
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

“The homers that dominate this board”
Boy it would be nice if people could state their opinion without that garbage
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2019, 11:46 PM   #85
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Flames played fine. One bad play on the shortie and a bad break on goal 1. Especially on a back to back.

Like the Flames themselves have been saying, that team effort is a win most games.

Last edited by AC; 10-13-2019 at 11:51 PM.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2019, 11:49 PM   #86
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

two out of six isn't good enough

Colorado, Dallas, Vegas, and SJ on the road is about as hard a schedule to start the season as possible though...pretty similar tone to one year ago on here and the team finished with 107 points. Need to give it a few more games before panicking
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:00 AM   #87
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Flames played fine. One bad play on the shortie and a bad break on goal 1. Especially on a back to back.

Likes the Flames themselves have been saying, that game is a win most games.
Special teams should have been the difference tonight in a good way. Instead, 0/4 and gave up a shorty.

Special Teams are actually a bit concerning dating back to last year:

18th PP last year.
21st PP this year.

21st PK last year.
13th PK this year.

We should be better at these things.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:06 AM   #88
Mayo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Seemed like a more complete game tonight

It's still early in the season - but we need some W's sooner than later - cannot always count on 2nd half runs
Mayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:06 AM   #89
calgarywinning
First Line Centre
 
calgarywinning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
Exp:
Default

Love this. Some Flames fans are like an unpinned grenades in a trench.

It's so negative.

Let's just take a short walk back to last season and where were the St. Louis blues before the Christmas break?

Maybe we could somehow get Neal back in a trade that included Jankowksi.
calgarywinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:23 AM   #90
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Learning not to get too invested in every single game and get stuck on that rollercoaster ride.

If they win enough to make the dance after 82, then great. How they go about getting there isn't a big concern. I think we know they have another gear or two. Wandering to the ledge after every loss is a tiresome routine and I'm hoping to participate in it less this time around.

Lots of season to get it figured out. These guys are notoriously slow to get there, but they do.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 12:25 AM   #91
flames_fan_down_under
I believe in the Jays.
 
flames_fan_down_under's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitsilano
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Man... man man man.

Frolik
Ryan
Bennett
Jankowski
Mangiapane

These are the Flames' 6-10 forwards.

These five guys collectively averaged 17 goals per 82 games last year. Averaged! And they're all depth guys...

The NHL is a really good league but it's not that good. The Flames' depth is fine. They've played a few bad games to start the year but there is still plenty of reason for hope.
Bit of an odd stat to post seeing that not one of those guys actually scored 17 goals last season.
flames_fan_down_under is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to flames_fan_down_under For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2019, 01:12 AM   #92
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

For those ragging on Derek Ryan he had 9 points through 30 games at the start of last season and then 17 points in the last 25 games. He’s also averaged 35 points/year the last 3 years. His points will come as will the rest of the bottom 6.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 02:15 AM   #93
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_fan_down_under View Post
Bit of an odd stat to post seeing that not one of those guys actually scored 17 goals last season.
per 82.
__________________
"We don't even know who our best player is yet. It could be any one of us at this point." - Peter LaFleur, player/coach, Average Joe's Gymnasium
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 03:00 AM   #94
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

What is needed is a ritual sacrifice. One of the posters with the frogs or salamanders should offer it up to the hockey gods.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2019, 05:56 AM   #95
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Janko was already traded if Kadri would have waived...he would not clear

Bennett is the most valuable and could fetch more than a 3rd
I seriously doubt that. Yakupov got a 4th only and actually out produced sam. Bennett is not going to have much value around the league. Better off keeping them.

Anything that can be had for janko, frolik, or brodie (or any combination therein) should be taken.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 06:02 AM   #96
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Man... man man man.

Frolik
Ryan
Bennett
Jankowski
Mangiapane

These are the Flames' 6-10 forwards.

These five guys collectively averaged 17 goals per 82 games last year. Averaged! And they're all depth guys...

The NHL is a really good league but it's not that good. The Flames' depth is fine. They've played a few bad games to start the year but there is still plenty of reason for hope.
Frolik and particularly jankowski hurt this team with lazy/ cowardly play, stone hands, and lack of on ice awareness. They should be sent packing asap.

Ryan and mangiapane shouldnf be included in the conversation and Bennett should not be moved out of the bottom 6 again. All of them are worthwhile depth though. Dont lump in our functional bottom Sixers with losers like janko. He belongs below lucic in terms of player worthiness
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 06:05 AM   #97
Saqe
First Line Centre
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Frolik should be paid what Ryan is, about 3 million per. But when you're paying a guy who doesn't move the needle much at all and ideally should be in your bottom six 4.3 million for a ridiculous five years, it's a mistake.



Even with today's cap there is no one who would give Frolik that kind of contract.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Saqe For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2019, 06:46 AM   #98
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

PP has not helped what is a disappointing start to the season.
Results will come if the 3ffort continues

Last edited by EldrickOnIce; 10-14-2019 at 07:02 AM.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2019, 07:09 AM   #99
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The team has no jump. They don't care.

I watched the Habs beat the Blues on Saturday. The Habs have nobody but just watch the effort.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 07:09 AM   #100
UKflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
UKflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Exp:
Default

I'm actually starting to wonder if Peters got to option of the line blender is becoming part of the problem. If we fail to score or fall behind out it comes and players have no idea who they are spending the next shift with. There is a real lack of chemistry in this team at the moment and blending the lines for 2 out of 3 periods every game isn't helping that.
#2RW is a prime example, players get a period or two to prove they belong or they get dropped back down the lines. This isn't just Bennett, Mangipane got the same treatment. Yes he ended up on his ass a lot but maybe that means he should be the shooter and Tkachuck should be the one on the boards digging out pucks, he is supposed to be the feisty one after all.
With everyone worrying about who they are playing with or being completly jumbled it is no wonder that the bottom 3 lines are struggling to get anything going.
UKflames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to UKflames For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021