07-07-2018, 10:43 PM
|
#1881
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
|
Bennett for Puljujarvi deal?
|
|
|
07-07-2018, 10:58 PM
|
#1882
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothskatingbrodie
Bennett for Puljujarvi deal?
|
Ugh. Why?
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-07-2018, 11:08 PM
|
#1883
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothskatingbrodie
Bennett for Puljujarvi deal?
|
My gut and the statistics tell me Puljujarvi is currently the better player and I also think he has higher upside. Therefore, I think I’d do this trade for sure. However, despite the fact that Puljujarvi has better stats despite playing more difficult opposition and starting in the defensive zone more often, the one thing you can’t discount is Puljujarvi had better linemates. So this probably skews the stats in Puljujarvi’s favour a bit.
Playing circumstances
Puljujarvi
OZS% 50.10%,
Quality of Opposition 0.1395,
Linemates
22.18% Lucic - McDavid - Puljujarvi
10.35% Lucic - Puljujarvi - Strome
10.08% Lucic - RNH - Puljujarvi
Bennett
OZS% 59.23
Quality of Opposition -0.0376
Linemates
25.24% Bennett - Jankowski - Hathaway
GAR
Puljujarvi - 46
Bennett - 19
Goals for percentage
Puljujarvi - 48.39% (on ice save % - 93.12, on ice shooting percentage - 6.64)
Bennett - 40.9% (on ice save % - 91.73, on ice shooting percentage - 5.66)
CF%
Puljujarvi - 50.96%
Bennett - 52.6%
Relative CF%
Puljujarvi - +1.8%
Bennett - -1.3%
I also think Puljujarvi would fit in rather nicely simply because a Frolik is able to play either wing.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Backlund - Neal
Frolik - Ryan - Puljujarvi
Mangiapane - Jankowski - Czarnik
Last edited by Nelson; 07-07-2018 at 11:49 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nelson For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-07-2018, 11:15 PM
|
#1884
|
Franchise Player
|
no way a trade between the Oilers and the Flames happen with those two players...
neither side would take the chance of that trade blowing up on them...
a third party would have to be involved after the fact, like the Hoffman trade
|
|
|
07-07-2018, 11:52 PM
|
#1885
|
First Line Centre
|
I’d rather stick with Bennett. Don’t want that glaikit dumpling on my team
If you’re not Scottish look up glaikit on urban dictionary etc. Describes Puljujarvi perfectly.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to soreshins For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2018, 12:03 AM
|
#1886
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
So this probably skews the stats in Puljujarvi’s favour a bit.
..
Bennett
OZS% 59.23
Quality of Opposition -0.0376
Linemates
25.24% Bennett - Jankowski - Hathaway
..
Gaudreau - Monahan - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Backlund - Neal
Frolik - Ryan - Puljujarvi
Mangiapane - Jankowski - Czarnik
|
You have Jankowski pencilled in on a 4th line and Hathaway doesn't make your top twelve, but the difference between that and Connor McDavid is a "bit".
__________________
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
07-08-2018, 07:24 AM
|
#1887
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
My gut and the statistics tell me Puljujarvi is currently the better player and I also think he has higher upside. Therefore, I think I’d do this trade for sure. However, despite the fact that Puljujarvi has better stats despite playing more difficult opposition and starting in the defensive zone more often, the one thing you can’t discount is Puljujarvi had better linemates. So this probably skews the stats in Puljujarvi’s favour a bit.
|
This is one of the times I throw stats out.
Both players have head issues that need to be overcome. Bennett's is a lack of confidence without production and a need to do too much that gets him in trouble by either hanging on to the puck too long, or taking silly penalties trying to force the play.
With JP there seems to be a lot of smoke in the air about his lack of overall maturity and the ability to use his talents to their fullest because his grey matter may get in the way.
The best bet to overcome these is the answer.
Can't discount quality of linemates though, for sure.
|
|
|
07-08-2018, 08:54 AM
|
#1888
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
My gut and the statistics tell me Puljujarvi is currently the better player and I also think he has higher upside. Therefore, I think I’d do this trade for sure. However, despite the fact that Puljujarvi has better stats despite playing more difficult opposition and starting in the defensive zone more often, the one thing you can’t discount is Puljujarvi had better linemates. So this probably skews the stats in Puljujarvi’s favour a bit.
Playing circumstances
Puljujarvi
OZS% 50.10%,
Quality of Opposition 0.1395,
Linemates
22.18% Lucic - McDavid - Puljujarvi
10.35% Lucic - Puljujarvi - Strome
10.08% Lucic - RNH - Puljujarvi
Bennett
OZS% 59.23
Quality of Opposition -0.0376
Linemates
25.24% Bennett - Jankowski - Hathaway
GAR
Puljujarvi - 46
Bennett - 19
Goals for percentage
Puljujarvi - 48.39% (on ice save % - 93.12, on ice shooting percentage - 6.64)
Bennett - 40.9% (on ice save % - 91.73, on ice shooting percentage - 5.66)
CF%
Puljujarvi - 50.96%
Bennett - 52.6%
Relative CF%
Puljujarvi - +1.8%
Bennett - -1.3%
I also think Puljujarvi would fit in rather nicely simply because a Frolik is able to play either wing.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Backlund - Neal
Frolik - Ryan - Puljujarvi
Mangiapane - Jankowski - Czarnik
|
You cited metrics not stats.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rhino For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2018, 11:21 PM
|
#1889
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I was reading some hypothetical trades for Karlsson earlier and had a question pop up with the Gretzky trade being mentioned. Can a team pay cold hard cash $$$ as part of hockey trades today? My guess is no in a cap world but wanted to check.
|
|
|
07-08-2018, 11:28 PM
|
#1890
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
Yeah, that's basically the central driver for the original statement I think.
|
no ####, I lol'ed at "considering retirement"
There is no considering...his retirement has been forced on account of no NHL teams wanting him
I am also considering retirement from the NHL
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 12:04 AM
|
#1891
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spuzzum
I was reading some hypothetical trades for Karlsson earlier and had a question pop up with the Gretzky trade being mentioned. Can a team pay cold hard cash $$$ as part of hockey trades today? My guess is no in a cap world but wanted to check.
|
No. The only way that money can be involved in a trade is with retaining salary.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 12:33 AM
|
#1892
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
No. The only way that money can be involved in a trade is with retaining salary.
|
Just curious (haven't looked into any details) but when Buffalo was looking to unload RoR before they had to pay his bonus, and was rumoured to be willing to take less back to do so, isn't that effectively what's happening in that kind of situation?
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 04:54 AM
|
#1893
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
Just curious (haven't looked into any details) but when Buffalo was looking to unload RoR before they had to pay his bonus, and was rumoured to be willing to take less back to do so, isn't that effectively what's happening in that kind of situation?
|
Not really, like Heatley before him (and others), he had a significant signing bonus that he got paid on July 1, 2018. Whoever's team he was on at that time had to pay the bonus, which was $7,500,000. So Buffalo wanted more after July 1 than they wanted before. That was just part of O'Reilly's contract.
With Gretzky (and others before the cap), they just traded actually cash in the trade.
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 07:54 AM
|
#1894
|
Franchise Player
|
some of the mock trades on twitter are laughable - such as:
TB - gets Karlsson and the rangers fifth rounders in 2020
Ottawa - gets Sergachev, Point, TB 2019 first roudner, Rangers 2019 second rounder
NYR - gets Ryan Callahan, bobby ryan and Ottawas 4 round 2019 pick
the players Tampa loses in this trade gnerated about 120 points - that is a lot out of the score sheet
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 08:00 AM
|
#1895
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Talk on 960 this morning about Panarin and goalie Bob wanting out of Columbus (or maybe it's a bargaining tactic).
Panarin here would be awesome. Bobrovsky would be even better.
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 08:03 AM
|
#1896
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Talk on 960 this morning about Panarin and goalie Bob wanting out of Columbus (or maybe it's a bargaining tactic).
Panarin here would be awesome. Bobrovsky would be even better.
|
Portzline had some interesting notes at the end of his segment on this the other day. Panarin literally grew up with nothing. Equipment from the lost and found, parents gone at a young age, the whole 9 yards. And Portzline suggested that because of this, he's a guy that wants his stuff. He wants the big city life and fancy things because he never had them.
Speculative obviously, but interesting.
__________________
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 08:16 AM
|
#1897
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
some of the mock trades on twitter are laughable - such as:
TB - gets Karlsson and the rangers fifth rounders in 2020
Ottawa - gets Sergachev, Point, TB 2019 first roudner, Rangers 2019 second rounder
NYR - gets Ryan Callahan, bobby ryan and Ottawas 4 round 2019 pick
the players Tampa loses in this trade gnerated about 120 points - that is a lot out of the score sheet
|
Huge price to pay for Tampa, but I also dont understand what's in it for the Rangers. Taking on cap from both teams and losing picks??? Obvioisly someone throwing mud at the wall.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Samonadreau For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2018, 08:31 AM
|
#1898
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
You have Jankowski pencilled in on a 4th line and Hathaway doesn't make your top twelve, but the difference between that and Connor McDavid is a "bit".
|
The way I look at it is that playing with McDavid would be a huge boost for Puljujarvi stats versus Bennett’s stats, but that starting significantly more often in the defensive zone and playing against more difficult opposition would mute this huge boost.
But I still probably should have taken out the words “a bit.” My understanding is that linemates are a more important factor than opposition. Your comment made me laugh. Sometimes you just have to laugh at yourself.
I think another thing is that Puljujarvi got better on ice save and shooting percentages so that would’ve made up a significant amount of the difference in the goals for percentage.
Also, to the other person, I don’t know what the difference is between metrics and stats.
Also also, I would still absolutely trade Bennett straight up for Puljujarvi.
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 09:11 AM
|
#1899
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
This is one of the times I throw stats out.
Both players have head issues that need to be overcome. Bennett's is a lack of confidence without production and a need to do too much that gets him in trouble by either hanging on to the puck too long, or taking silly penalties trying to force the play.
With JP there seems to be a lot of smoke in the air about his lack of overall maturity and the ability to use his talents to their fullest because his grey matter may get in the way.
The best bet to overcome these is the answer.
Can't discount quality of linemates though, for sure.
|
With respect to the grey matter, I wonder how much of his ability to understand things is a language issue. When he was drafted by the Oilers, he did not understand any English.
|
|
|
07-09-2018, 11:33 AM
|
#1900
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
This is something the Flames should look at:
https://www.freep.com/story/sports/n...ock/768163002/
Quote:
It would not be surprising to see the Wings trade Athanasiou. If they get a good offer – at least a second-round pick or a good prospect, preferably a defenseman – he could be flipped to help the rebuild.
As talented as Athanasiou is, he shouldn’t be as quiet as he is at times – last season he went for stretches of 10 and 15 games without a goal. That came even as he averaged 15:19 minutes per game, up from 13:28 in 2016-17. His average power play time increased to 1:44 from 1:13, yet he contributed only four points during man advantages.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM.
|
|