Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-05-2024, 04:10 PM   #41
Flames1217
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

If there is an extension in place it makes me believe that this may be a hockey trade instead of a futures deal.

Will be interesting to see who is involved.
Flames1217 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:11 PM   #42
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Their package can't possibly be the best the Flames can get here. Especially three days out.
Maybe not from a fan perspective, but I would bet that anything Tampa Bay can offer is probably within the ballpark of the maximum other teams are going to offer. Might be a case of inflated expectations on our side, but there are some realistic (good) pieces that make TB as good a destination as anyone else.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:11 PM   #43
HighLifeMan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Don't want Howard.

Some combination of Perbix, Gauthier, Huuhtanen, Thompson and a 1st 2026 would be alright with me.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:12 PM   #44
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I have heard Lundell is not in play from Florida. I reported a couple days ago the initial offer from TB was 2026 1st, 2024 3rd, and Howard. I wonder if they accepted that or if there has been some tinkering.
dissentowner is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:13 PM   #45
saillias
#1 Goaltender
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

the biggest issue for me with TB is that a 2026 1st, if part of the package is two years away from even happening.

Then add 3 more years to see if you have a player from it, maybe 4. This is a ~5 year investment. That isn't planning for now, this is planning for 2030. Decent chance the front office won't even see the fruits of their labor, coaching staff will have changed, perhaps twice.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:13 PM   #46
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

isn't Calgary going to have to take on some salary for this to work for TB?

Would Hagel as part of the puzzle be something to consider?
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:13 PM   #47
bigpete
Crash and Bang Winger
 
bigpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Is anybody tracking the flight? I heard it made a stop in Toronto.
bigpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:14 PM   #48
Ashes
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Ashes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Exp:
Default

For whatever it's worth, on 32 thoughts today, Elliott was talking to Jeff about Florida and how good their team is and how they're set to compete for a cup for the next few seasons and should go all in this year.

Elliott says that the best/only pieces they really have available to move are Lundell and their young goalie. Both Elliott and Jeff agreed that if that's the price they have to pay to win it all this year that they should do it/will do it even though they really like their young players.
Ashes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashes For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:14 PM   #49
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Their package can't possibly be the best the Flames can get here. Especially three days out.
Lundell was always a pipe dream. It was always going to be a 1st, roster player, and prospect
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:14 PM   #50
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Even if it's not Lundell from FLA, I like their prospects more.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:15 PM   #51
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
If there is an extension in place it makes me believe that this may be a hockey trade instead of a futures deal.

Will be interesting to see who is involved.
Could only really be Cirelli, Sergachev, Hagel or Cernak if it is a hockey trade with salary coming back.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:15 PM   #52
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

The Lightning have no cap space, so even if the Flames retain on Hanifin's expiring contract, the Lightning still need to dump cap. Who will it be? Paul? Sheary?
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:16 PM   #53
FlamesAreOne
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FlamesAreOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Man, I am not loving Tampa as his destination personally.
FlamesAreOne is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAreOne For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:17 PM   #54
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
The Lightning have no cap space, so even if the Flames retain on Hanifin's expiring contract, the Lightning still need to dump cap. Who will it be? Paul? Sheary?
They have LTIR space.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:17 PM   #55
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
Default

Against the grain, I want Howard included.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to genetic_phreek For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:18 PM   #56
butterfly
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
the biggest issue for me with TB is that a 2026 1st, if part of the package is two years away from even happening.

Then add 3 more years to see if you have a player from it, maybe 4. This is a ~5 year investment. That isn't planning for now, this is planning for 2030. Decent chance the front office won't even see the fruits of their labor, coaching staff will have changed, perhaps twice.
When today is 2030, you will want to win now every bit as much as you do today.
butterfly is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:18 PM   #57
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
isn't Calgary going to have to take on some salary for this to work for TB?

Would Hagel as part of the puzzle be something to consider?
Hagel has gone from 44 points to 64 points to likely around 80 points this year and is locked in at 6.5 for 8 years and is 25 years old. Doubt he would be available.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:18 PM   #58
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

I have no issue with acquiring Howard in a nutshell. Would just prefer a center over yet another winger, but it is what it is.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:18 PM   #59
Jetfire
First Line Centre
 
Jetfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
The Lightning have no cap space, so even if the Flames retain on Hanifin's expiring contract, the Lightning still need to dump cap. Who will it be? Paul? Sheary?
For this season? Though Hanifin's cheaper I think he eats into injured Sergachev's money. For next year though when his deal kicks in, yeah they'll need to ship someone out either in this deal or in the summer.
Jetfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:19 PM   #60
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
They have LTIR space.
Yep, I would think an contract would also be sent back to the Flames (i.e. like the Lindholm trade)

if the trade occurred
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021