06-19-2019, 04:25 PM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
BOG approves expanded video review/coaches challenge
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
Details on expanded video review/coaches challenge/officiating modifications that have been approved by Competition Committee and today by NHL B of G are sketchy because GMs need to hear/sign off tomorrow in VAN, but here’s some of what we’re hearing:
Referees would be permitted to check their own work by viewing monitor at penalty box after they’ve assessed a major penalty or a double minor and, if necessary, amend/rescind or uphold the call
Coaches challenge for video review would be expanded to include ability to challenge missed calls that lead to tainted goals — uncalled illegal hand pass (Meier to Karlsson); uncalled high-sticking of puck to a teammate; uncalled puck hitting the out-of-play protective netting.
Not 100 per cent certain of this but I believe a failed challenge in these instances would result in a minor penalty, same as the current rule for coaches’ challenge on offside. If so, that would limit volume of challenges and eliminate frivolous challenges.
Again, just a guess, but I would think these new video review challenge criteria would become an automatic review by Hockey Ops situation room if in final minute of a game or in overtime.
Finally, none of this is 100 per firm/official until after the GMs deal with it in their meeting tomorrow in Vancouver.
Last edited by sureLoss; 06-19-2019 at 04:32 PM.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:27 PM
|
#2
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Every penalty is a Major / Double Minor*
*pending review
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:35 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I hope they have the sense this time to put a time limit on those challenges or some other criteria so they're not rewinding every play ad infinitum until they find some stupid reason to take a goal off the board.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:37 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
This is going to suck so, so much.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:40 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hyperbole Chamber
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
Details on expanded video review/coaches challenge/officiating modifications that have been approved by Competition Committee and today by NHL B of G are sketchy because GMs need to hear/sign off tomorrow in VAN, but here’s some of what we’re hearing:
Referees would be permitted to check their own work by viewing monitor at penalty box after they’ve assessed a major penalty or a double minor and, if necessary, amend/rescind or uphold the call
Coaches challenge for video review would be expanded to include ability to challenge missed calls that lead to tainted goals — uncalled illegal hand pass (Meier to Karlsson); uncalled high-sticking of puck to a teammate; uncalled puck hitting the out-of-play protective netting.
Not 100 per cent certain of this but I believe a failed challenge in these instances would result in a minor penalty, same as the current rule for coaches’ challenge on offside. If so, that would limit volume of challenges and eliminate frivolous challenges.
Again, just a guess, but I would think these new video review challenge criteria would become an automatic review by Hockey Ops situation room if in final minute of a game or in overtime.
Finally, none of this is 100 per firm/official until after the GMs deal with it in their meeting tomorrow in Vancouver.
|
I'm guessing it will have to be within two assist touches prior to the goal.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:41 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
I'm guessing it will have to be within two assist touches prior to the goal.
|
That would be the logical solution ... so don't count on it.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:43 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
The tradeoff should have been to eliminate the useless offside video review, or at least limit it to one overhead camera so that only obvious errors are overturned.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:44 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Man, they are missing the low hanging fruit - missed high sticking (and bad high sticking calls). That's the call I see blown most, and the one easiest to resolve through replay.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:46 PM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
|
The San Jose Sharks 2019 Playoffs Rule Set?
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:47 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Hey, remember back in 2015 when some media guy tried to start controversy because Jones appeared to hit the puck with a high stick prior to Russell's GWG in Game One against Vancouver?
Now, that would potentially be reviewable. Does anyone want that?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:51 PM
|
#11
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
I hope they have some of these reviews during TV timeouts or some games are going to be painful.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 04:54 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Are they going to be using cameras better than 480i 15fps? Because that would help...
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 05:02 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hyperbole Chamber
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Are they going to be using cameras better than 480i 15fps? Because that would help...
|
No. The Samsung Galaxy Tab 1's on Saddledome Telus wi-fi can't play anything more than that.
Maybe clear the screens of all of the fingerprints too.
|
|
|
06-19-2019, 05:04 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Video review should be done off ice, with no input from refs, by a guy with decent equipment. It can be done in 30 seconds. I'd go for one on ice official, one in the booth with video equipment - he sees something wrong, looks at it, calls it in - boom. No need for challenges, just another official making a call.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2019, 07:17 PM
|
#15
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Of course the NHL is going to do this in the way that wastes as much time and sucks as much life out of the game as possible.
__________________
Fire Geoff Ward.
Into the Sun.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to theinfinitejar For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2019, 07:43 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
This is terrible. We need less reviews, not more.
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:42 PM
|
#17
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
|
I hope they get this right
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:55 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Everybody: Video review sucks
NHL: expands it
Typical. So typical. Video review is absolutely terrible. I would much rather put up with 1-2 egregious human errors on offsides per year than waste more time reviewing trivial things.
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:59 PM
|
#19
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
How are people surprised about the expanded review?
After the blown major in the SJ/VGS series, the blown offsides call in the SJ/COL series, and the blown hand pass in the SJ/STL series, this was guaranteed to be coming.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2019, 07:46 AM
|
#20
|
In the Sin Bin
|
This isn't going to backfire like literally every other coaches' challenge situation pro leagues have implemented over the last few years has...
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.
|
|