Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor
What an insightful post.
Now. You going to answer the questions?
|
I would rather let your consistent rants die from lack of attention as they serve no purpose but to #### on Slava or myself while offering little in the way of any interesting or new information on this thread.
But, i'll bite a little.
Let's start with the history of Man U and the culture of winning instilled there by its own past, ownership, and the fans. Man U isnt just any top half EPL team; it is (arguably) the most expensive franchise in the world, with (arguably) the most prolific history. This team demands results from its managers and players.
Concurrently managers have to live in the shadows of one of the greatest managers of all time, SIR Alex Ferguson. Ferguson was manager from 1986-2013: 27 YEARS and won 38 trophies. No one has come close, and they certainly havent been given much of a leash:
Managers since then:
David Moyes: 51 Games; 53% win %
Ryan Giggs (caretaker): 4 games; 50%
Van Gaal: 103 games; 52%
Mourinho: 144 games; 58% (plus Europa and league cup)
OGS: 118 games; 57%
Its interesting that Jose and OGS have similar win % - while Jose taking a major trophy - and yet we speak of his reign their as a disaster. But i don't want to get into that, its just an observation.
I also think the amount of money a team spends can add to the pressure, as it explains why Lampard is feeling more heat. Spending money in the transfer windows and seeing a lack of results can increase pressure as well. Man U have spent over 250 million in the last 2 years.
So yeah, lots of pressure for a manager - and Man U started this season off... not great.. they lose to Spurs 6-1 at home. Barcelona got trounced by Munich in the semis of the Champions League and that was enough to sack their manager. the Spurs loss probably would have been a bigger deal if Liverpool didn't get crushed by Leeds the same weekend. Then they get turfed from the Champions League.
The Pressure was on, and it wasnt just Slava:
https://talksport.com/football/80155...mpions-league/
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...-sack-23147735
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...ammed-sack-SNT
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...ampions-League
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...vals-City.html
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/footb...end-of-season/
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-b1615198.html
https://weallfollowunited.com/2020/1...-being-sacked/
https://www.skysports.com/football/n...d-two-years-on
So, I would say it was in the news. It was discussed at length in a lot of newspapers, podcasts, and on TV (Sky Sports, Football Daily etc.). I would also say, where there is smoke there is often fire.
So why get mad at Slava?
You bring up Tottenham in response and why Mourinho isnt getting the same heat. It frankly has to do with all of the above. Tottenham lacks the same domestic and international past as Man U. Its also not as popular of a club or worth as much. You cannot compare the managing environments of Tottenham and Man U as both teams have different expectations (fans, owners, etc.)
For example, Pochettino is lauded for bringing the spurs into relevancy, had some unreal teams and never one a significant trophy. That type of performance over 5 years wouldn't fly at Man U, but at Tottenham Pochettino is a modern deity.
So, the managerial pressure is lower..
You may disagree, but Mourinho still holds a ton of cache in footballing worlds, and to Daniel Levy. He called him one of the two best managers in the EPL when hired. Gave him 19 mil a year to manage Tottenham, a notoriously stingy club (on top of paying Pochettino's severance). He got Tottenham out of the bottom third last year and had them fighting for a champions league spot until injuries to Son and Kane (and Lloris) derailed that. They got Europa (if they hadn't it might be a different tune this year) and look to have a pretty good shot at winning that. I would argue that, given Jose's reputation, salary, and limited success from last year given injuries, his leash is longer.
This offseason, Tottenham added some key players but in the end, the fees paid were not outrageous. They didn't spend 250 million like Chelsea, but added some key pieces for sensible money. So the money pressure isn't really there, yet.
This season, Tottenham's stated goals were top 4 and champions league qualification. I would also argue that either silverware or near silverware was important too. So far, he has at least met those marks. League Cup Final, decent upcoming draws in the FA Cup, and currently in a crowded mess for top 4. He even flirted with 1st place for a while - a historically big deal. He has effectively beaten the teams he has needed to beat to prove that this team, under him, is capable of winning - Man U, Man City, Chelsea.
And don't get me wrong, he is taking flack for the recent slump and the horrendous draws Spurs are suffering against lower ranked teams. This team should easily be in Top 4 if they didnt surrender 11 points buy allowing goals in the final 20 min. That is on him and its on the team for sure.
But, for all of the above reasons, the media isnt hounding Jose or Spurs. I can't find a single opinion piece suggesting he should be sacked, nor can i find one suggesting he is on the hotseat. The Athletic posted an article after fulham saying he needs to share the blame with the players. thats it.
Don't get me wrong. Spurs fans are pissed over the recent run of games, but there is no point comparing the potential outcomes of Mourinho and OGS.