Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-05-2024, 04:20 PM   #61
bigpete
Crash and Bang Winger
 
bigpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
the biggest issue for me with TB is that a 2026 1st, if part of the package is two years away from even happening.

Then add 3 more years to see if you have a player from it, maybe 4. This is a ~5 year investment. That isn't planning for now, this is planning for 2030. Decent chance the front office won't even see the fruits of their labor, coaching staff will have changed, perhaps twice.
I would trade for as many firsts as far into the future as possible. Good teams could be bad in 2 - 3 years from now and vice versa. If I had two choices:

1. Taking a first rounder in 2024 that is probably going to be in the 15 - 31 range
2. Taking a first rounder in 2026 that could be anywhere from 1 - 31

I would take the Option 2 in 2026 every time.
bigpete is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to bigpete For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:20 PM   #62
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

Tampa really has no young players or prospects that move the needle. Hard to imagine a trade that will feel like a win for the Flames.
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:21 PM   #63
8sPOT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
8sPOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
the biggest issue for me with TB is that a 2026 1st, if part of the package is two years away from even happening.

Then add 3 more years to see if you have a player from it, maybe 4. This is a ~5 year investment. That isn't planning for now, this is planning for 2030. Decent chance the front office won't even see the fruits of their labor, coaching staff will have changed, perhaps twice.
On the flip side though, because it is so far away, this could be a top 10 pick for all we know, top 5 even. Assuming of course it isn't protected.

Then thats not a 2030 player but more like 2028, possibly right away even in 2027.
8sPOT is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 8sPOT For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:21 PM   #64
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashes View Post
For whatever it's worth, on 32 thoughts today, Elliott was talking to Jeff about Florida and how good their team is and how they're set to compete for a cup for the next few seasons and should go all in this year.

Elliott says that the best/only pieces they really have available to move are Lundell and their young goalie. Both Elliott and Jeff agreed that if that's the price they have to pay to win it all this year that they should do it/will do it even though they really like their young players.
I wonder how Knight is seen by Florida and the rest of the league right now.

2 more years left at $4.5M ... .898 save percentage in the AHL this season is not great.

Feels that a team that wants to win now, and is facing a bit of a cap crunch would potentially want to move that contract out, and is probably negative value at this point.

Hanifin
Dansk

for

Lundell
Knight

I'd do that in a heartbeat, and helps the Panthers open up $4.5M of cap space for two more years after this one that they desperately need.

For the Flames they take the risk on Knight...but they can feel more confident moving Markstrom, and then would have Knight/Wolf in the goalie pipeline (two guys played in two WJC championships together for the Americans).
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:21 PM   #65
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by genetic_phreek View Post
Against the grain, I want Howard included.
I like Howard as a prospect a lot but hd feels like the type to pull a Fox and I can’t handle that again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
Tampa really has no young players or prospects that move the needle. Hard to imagine a trade that will feel like a win for the Flames.
An unprotected 2026 1st from Tampa would be nice. They might not be so good in 2 years.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:21 PM   #66
Flames0910
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
the biggest issue for me with TB is that a 2026 1st, if part of the package is two years away from even happening.

Then add 3 more years to see if you have a player from it, maybe 4. This is a ~5 year investment. That isn't planning for now, this is planning for 2030. Decent chance the front office won't even see the fruits of their labor, coaching staff will have changed, perhaps twice.
Yes you have to discount the value slightly as it's a future asset... however CC could always use this pick in a trade with a team who's looking further out. 1sts always have value and 2026 is only two seasons away. A high first could end up joining the team more quickly, or the pick could be packaged out next year when it's only a season out and has higher value.

two picks and a prospect is not bad value TBH.

Last edited by Flames0910; 03-05-2024 at 04:25 PM.
Flames0910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:23 PM   #67
browntrout
Crash and Bang Winger
 
browntrout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I have heard Lundell is not in play from Florida. I reported a couple days ago the initial offer from TB was 2026 1st, 2024 3rd, and Howard. I wonder if they accepted that or if there has been some tinkering.
The key is that 2026 first round, has to unprotected or if top 10 protected, then a 2027 first round pick with no lottery protection

Could be absolute homerun, I see Tampa Bay being a much crappier team in 3-4 years
browntrout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to browntrout For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:23 PM   #68
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Plus... who knows... maybe Tampa faceplants in 2026 and we get Gavin McKenna or Joe Iginla.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:24 PM   #69
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

So will it end up being another Iginla trade?

Hanowski for Hanifin?
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:25 PM   #70
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

These rumored Tampa returns are depressing TBH.

Basically the same return that Ben Chariot got as a rental a few years ago.

A 26 year old top pairing defenseman with an 8 year extension should return a huge package.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:26 PM   #71
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

Maybe they'd like to send Point our way. They don't need that guy anyway.
flylock shox is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to flylock shox For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:26 PM   #72
butterfly
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
These rumored Tampa returns are depressing TBH.

Basically the same return that Ben Chariot got as a rental a few years ago.

A 26 year old top pairing defenseman with an 8 year extension should return a huge package.
Or they can wait a few months and sign him to a better 7 year deal without giving Calgary a thing…
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:27 PM   #73
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

One thing about that 2026 draft pick...for those that are down on 2026 picks....2026 is Joe Iginla's draft year.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:27 PM   #74
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really like the 2026 unprotected first if that’s part of this deal. Very attractive asset IMO. Tampa is on its way down.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:28 PM   #75
D as in David
#1 Goaltender
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Huuhtanen is intriguing, not as the main return but as a sweetener. I wonder if the Flames have scouted him.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:29 PM   #76
Bingo Jr.
Bingo's Official Offspring
Yes My Dad Knows I'm Here
 
Bingo Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I wonder how imminent a trade is
Bingo Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:29 PM   #77
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Gauthier + Howard + 2026 1st + cap dump for extended Hanifin with 50% retained on remainder of expiring contract?

Can see the Lightning moving Cirelli, not really living up to that contract. Would be shocked if they moved Hagel. That Nick Paul extension looks rough these days given he's a -21+/-.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:30 PM   #78
Jiggy_12
Franchise Player
 
Jiggy_12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Any team is capable of paying the price, it’s a matter of how creative they get
Jiggy_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2024, 04:30 PM   #79
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I’m sure Tampa with Hedman , Point , Vasileski , Hanifin, Sergachev and Kucherov will be bottom 10 in 2 years ….
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2024, 04:30 PM   #80
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Huuhtanen is intriguing, not as the main return but as a sweetener. I wonder if the Flames have scouted him.
Huuhtanen and Perbix would convince me Conroy is trading purposefully for interesting names
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021