12-08-2017, 09:11 AM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
|
18-19 Cap Projected at $78M-$82M
News Update@PierreVLeBrun
NHL shared next season salary cap projection with Governors today: between $78 M and $82 M depending on negotiated inflator with NHLPA in June... so either way, up from current $75 M
At least $3M more in space due to the cap increase + at least $4M coming off the books from Stajan and Jagr. Get that Backlund extension done, Brad!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:15 AM
|
#2
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Section 217
|
And Peter Chiarelli breathes a sigh of relief...
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CrazyCaper For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:15 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
With Stajan, Versteeg, Jagr, the Mason Raymond buyout coming off the books, and possibly a Brouwer buyout, this team could fill holes with prospects and have a large budget left to re-sign Backlund and still add a good player if they want.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:18 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Plus 1M from Raymond buyout ending, and 1.75M from Versteeg contract.
Jankowski and Kulak are going to get nice raises though.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:19 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Oh yeah, forgot about the Raymond buyout ending and that Versteeg's contract was more significant. $9M-$14M in cap space right there, with Backlund the only significant UFA to be re-signed and no RFAs due for big pay hikes. Even figuring in AHL replacements or veteran signings to plug some of the lineup departures, $5M-$6M for Backlund should be easily achievable and quite comfortable under the cap.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:20 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Thats a significant bump, I thought $2-3M at best.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:21 AM
|
#7
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
The cap figure is astounding, i doubt most teams will even spend to it. At the time when they introduced the salary cap process, there was only one or two teams spending that much(80 million). I am not sure even the Flames can keep up with that.
Last edited by Flamenspiel; 12-08-2017 at 09:34 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamenspiel For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:21 AM
|
#9
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Plus 1M from Raymond buyout ending, and 1.75M from Versteeg contract.
Jankowski and Kulak are going to get nice raises though.
|
I predict Jankowski will sign a bridge deal similar to Sam, 2-3 years.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:37 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman88
I predict Jankowski will sign a bridge deal similar to Sam, 2-3 years.
|
Yeah I don't expect anything crazy either, but it's going to be more than he gets now so it'll eat some of that cap space.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:41 AM
|
#11
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin
News Update@PierreVLeBrun
NHL shared next season salary cap projection with Governors today: between $78 M and $82 M depending on negotiated inflator with NHLPA in June... so either way, up from current $75 M
At least $3M more in space due to the cap increase + at least $4M coming off the books from Stajan and Jagr. Get that Backlund extension done, Brad!
|
I'm not a cap guy, but I don't get how the cap is going up like it is. I mean fine Vegas is there, but that's just adding a larger pool of money to a larger pool, it shouldn't be bumping everyone's cap from 3 to 5 million bucks.
I mean frankly isn't a 3 million dollar increase equivalent to about $500 million in increased revenue?
I'm watching quite a few games and seeing a lot of empty seats in a lot of rinks including Vancouver and Ottawa, so I'm not sure how that makes sense.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:43 AM
|
#12
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
With Stajan, Versteeg, Jagr, the Mason Raymond buyout coming off the books, and possibly a Brouwer buyout, this team could fill holes with prospects and have a large budget left to re-sign Backlund and still add a good player if they want.
|
I don't know how much room they'll have to add a good player. For a year perhaps, but after that Tkachuks contract isn't going to come cheap.
The potential Brouwer buyout will help. Just to make sure I understand this correctly:
Brouwer is getting $4.5million/year each of the next two years for a total of $9million owed
He's over 26 so take 2/3rds of that, $6million owed
Double the length and you've got a cap hit of $1.5million/year for 4 seasons
Correct?
I don't see a situation where they don't buy him out this offseason. $3 million/year in space easily pays for his replacement and then some.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:45 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
The more the cap increases, the more it helps teams that are poor cap managers.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:47 AM
|
#14
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
A year with a significantly increasing cap after some years without is not a year to grab a star free agent. It's a year to spend assets on a star already under contract.
If it's closer to $82 million, then we'll see an inflated free agency full of dumb car buyers racing into dealerships saying "I've got lots of money and want to get something awesome!!".
This is where every team flashes money towards star players that are set to be free agents while the Flames flash a surplus of D-men to GM's and snipe a star scoring forward under contract.
Last edited by jayswin; 12-08-2017 at 09:50 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:58 AM
|
#15
|
First Line Centre
|
Resign backlund. Fill the rest with prospects.
Unless we get a true #1 Rw I don't think we need anything. Would prefer they wait and go crazy at the trade deadline
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 09:59 AM
|
#16
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Good chance to lock up JANKO long term at value. 6 years 2.5 per.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 10:05 AM
|
#17
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipper_3434
Good chance to lock up JANKO long term at value. 6 years 2.5 per.
|
Why would he do that?
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
|
Cheese,
ClubFlames,
CsInMyBlood,
dino7c,
ForeverFlameFan,
HockeyPuck,
ignite09,
kkaleR,
Lil Pedro,
MisterJoji,
Otto-matic,
redflamesfan08,
Rubicant
|
12-08-2017, 10:11 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
With Stajan, Versteeg, Jagr, the Mason Raymond buyout coming off the books, and possibly a Brouwer buyout, this team could fill holes with prospects and have a large budget left to re-sign Backlund and still add a good player if they want.
|
or you let backlund walk and give tavares his $10M, and our center depth becomes tavares/monahan/jankowski/lazar
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 10:15 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevman
I don't know how much room they'll have to add a good player. For a year perhaps, but after that Tkachuks contract isn't going to come cheap.
The potential Brouwer buyout will help. Just to make sure I understand this correctly:
Brouwer is getting $4.5million/year each of the next two years for a total of $9million owed
He's over 26 so take 2/3rds of that, $6million owed
Double the length and you've got a cap hit of $1.5million/year for 4 seasons
Correct?
I don't see a situation where they don't buy him out this offseason. $3 million/year in space easily pays for his replacement and then some.
|
https://www.capfriendly.com/buyout_c...r/troy-brouwer
Yes, your calculations are correct.
|
|
|
12-08-2017, 10:22 AM
|
#20
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenspiel
The cap figure is astounding, i doubt most teams will even spend to it. At the time when they introduced the salary cap process, there was only one or two teams spending that much(80 million). I am not sure even the Flames can keep up with that.
|
Way more teams will spend to it then should. That's why teams need taxpayer funder arenas and why we might get another lockout, because teams can't manage a budget that matches their revenue.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.
|
|