11-21-2015, 07:52 AM
|
#1
|
First Line Centre
|
Let's talk about RADON
Because of this thread:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?p=5409840
And some other info I came across I've been looking into Radon, bought a detector and had a Radon company come check out my house. Is Radon really a serious concern? If you read all the sites WHO, Health Canada, etc. It's nothing but legitimate serious concern, but the reality seems to be that nobody really takes this seriously and most people have never heard of it (let alone tested their homes). If it wasn't for legitimate organizations putting up warnings the Radon thing smells like a scam. Is it just in it's infancy of awareness? In Calgary there are only 2 legitimate testing and mitigation companies and if the problem is as serious as everyone lets on they'd be backlogs for years, but when I met with one they basically said it's a pretty slow line of work.
Beginning this month Alberta adopts the 2010 NBC that requires a rough in radon reduction system in new construction. So the Governments are taking this seriously, but the general public does not seem convinced and most people (including me) hadn't even heard of it as an issue.
So anyone get their homes tested for Radon before? Is this the first you've heard of it? Is this really a concern? Why is there not more awareness around Radon?
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:07 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
I've really only heard of Radon being a concern because it is one of Mike Holmes campaigns and as such I view it as being blown out of proportion.
From the little bit that I know about Geology in Western Canada the occurrence and concentration of uranium rich rocks is very limited in Southern Alberta. As such, I wouldn't get too freaked out about my basement getting filled with radon. If I lived in areas with higher Uranium concentrations like Northern Saskatchewan or parts of Ontario I would probably look into it more seriously.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:07 AM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boxed-in
|
Have heard of it for about 5 years.
I don't worry about it because I think there's plenty of air exchange in my house, including the basement. My furnace fan runs most of the summer bringing in lots of fresh air, and I have air returns and combustion air drawn from the basement. And I've looked for statistics or reported evidence that there's a higher likelihood of there being a problem in my area of the city and found none.
Detailed story made short:I think radon is only a huge problem when air when air flow in basements is very poor, or in very well sealed houses with minimal air exchange. AND, ofcourse, there must be the correct underlying soil conditions. But maybe I just have my head in the sand because I don't want to get suckered into paying for a test kit.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:30 AM
|
#4
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
I've really only heard of Radon being a concern because it is one of Mike Holmes campaigns and as such I view it as being blown out of proportion.
From the little bit that I know about Geology in Western Canada the occurrence and concentration of uranium rich rocks is very limited in Southern Alberta. As such, I wouldn't get too freaked out about my basement getting filled with radon. If I lived in areas with higher Uranium concentrations like Northern Saskatchewan or parts of Ontario I would probably look into it more seriously.
|
According to this map, we're in the highest risk zone:
http://mr-radon.ca/toronto-region/ra.../#!prettyPhoto
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:53 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Had mine tested, came back at 110 Bq/m3. Canadian limit is 200, so I figure I'm OK.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:57 AM
|
#6
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
http://www.forensic-applications.com/radon/radon.html
Industrial Hygienists, in general, are engaged in protection of humans against the harmful effects of ionizing (and nonionizing radiation). The specialized field of managing ionizing radiation is known as “Health Physics” and the job of the Health Physicist is to manage the beneficial use of ionizing radiation while protecting workers and the public from potential hazards. Although political organizations (such as the US EPA) publish a variety of statements of elevated risk, to date (2010) there are no scientific studies that have ever actually shown that radon gas, as typically seen in houses, increases the risk of cancer. To be clear: There are NO valid studies that have conclusively demonstrated that typical residential exposures to radon increase the risk of cancer at all. In fact, all of the valid studies performed thus far show one of two things: 1) No risk and/or 2) a decreasing risk of cancer. This view is reflected in a position statement issued by the Health Physics Society, the premier Health Physics organization in the US. According to the position statement issued by the Health Physics Society1a, for doses below 100 mSv (10 rem)
“…risks of health effects are either too small to be observed or are non-existent."
http://www.cato.org/publications/com...at-false-alarm
Last edited by troutman; 11-21-2015 at 12:07 PM.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 09:03 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
I wish I had less scruples and got in on this cash cow before the scam gets shut down.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 09:16 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace
|
I would interested in knowing what the underlying data actually is for that map. I bet the radon sampling is probably very sparse. For Western Canada, they are basically just using the extents of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and putting the whole area as high.
Here is what a team a scientists published, less than 10 years ago, about Uranium potential in Southern Alberta:
Quote:
we could not identify significant sources of uranium.
|
http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/conferences...m-matveeva.pdf
Last edited by calgarygeologist; 11-21-2015 at 09:21 AM.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 10:03 AM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
|
It's almost as bad as dihydrogen monoxide!
__________________
...Rob
The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs;
it's Don't Tread On Me.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rbochan For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2015, 10:06 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbochan
It's almost as bad as dihydrogen monoxide!
|
http://www.dhmo.org/truth/Dihydrogen-Monoxide.html
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2015, 10:36 AM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbochan
It's almost as bad as dihydrogen monoxide!
|
I wouldn't go that far, but the risks are probably over-stated. Still it's pretty cheap to do the test yourself (I bought a 3-month test kit from a not for profit group) if you're concerned, particularly if you spend a lot of time in your basement. I'd be pretty hesitant to hire one of the companies advertising all over to come in and do the test for me.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 11:07 AM
|
#12
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
|
I've known about Radon for about 20 years. My wife however had not and as was in full panic smother the kids mode from the radon commercials recently. She insisted that we have the house tested. So I bought a three month test kit for $40 back in June. Sent the kit back in October and just got my results this week. 59 Bq/m^3, 200 is when people start dropping like flies...hopefully this puts her at ease.
__________________
Long time caller, first time listener
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 11:43 AM
|
#13
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Since I'm on a crawl space with a poly sheet over dirt, I was concerned about radon. I live on the island but they've redone the ratings over the last few years and it could be a concern, so I ended up buying a detector as well.
In regions where levels are high, think it's worth looking into.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 01:04 PM
|
#14
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
I wish I had less scruples and got in on this cash cow before the scam gets shut down.
|
Ya these types of comments^
From the canadian cancer society radon is second to cigarette smoking for causing lung cancer. This is from heir website:
Exposure to radon gas increases your risk of lung cancer. This risk depends on the level and length of exposure, as well as if you are a smoker. Lung cancer can develop after years of radon exposure. Health Canada estimates that about 16% of lung cancer deaths are related to being exposed to radon in the home. Radon exposure is the leading cause of lung cancer in non-smokers and it’s estimated that in Canada there are about 3000 lung cancer deaths related to radon each year. If you smoke, you are at an even higher risk of developing lung cancer if you are exposed to radon.
Read more: http://www.cancer.ca/en/prevention-a...#ixzz3s9rWHEVl
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:29 PM
|
#15
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Radon isn't a scam, and should be taken seriously. Obviously if you're not living overtop of decaying Uranium, it's not going to be much of an issue for you.
It's an issue we've been dealing with in Saskatchewan for a long time. Lot of hotspots around the province that have tested well above 1000 Bq/m3.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 08:32 PM
|
#16
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio
Sent the kit back in October and just got my results this week. 59 Bq/m^3, 200 is when people start dropping like flies...hopefully this puts her at ease.
|
I've lived in greater than 200 for my entire life. Not good for long term health, I agree, but the dropping like flies comment was way too much.
|
|
|
11-22-2015, 11:21 AM
|
#17
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto
|
My wife would be very pleased to see this thread on CP. She's the program coordinator for radon awareness for Ontario
It doesn't get a lot of attention as tobacco is what people usually associate with lung cancer.
The danger with it is long term exposure. Because it's a gas that arises from rock, the concern if you spend a lot of time in an area the gas can collect and concentrate, such as a basement or basement suite. You can get a kit from home Depot and test areas where you spend time regularly. Leave it there for 3 months, and send it off to the lab for results.
If you do have high levels in the home, it can be rectified by installing a fan pipe in the basement to vent the gas outside.
She had a lot of fun working with Mike Holmes on the PSA, and hopes it reaches a lot of Canadians.
I can relay any questions you might have on radon to her.
LChoy
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LChoy For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-22-2015, 11:37 AM
|
#18
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
I've lived in greater than 200 for my entire life. Not good for long term health, I agree, but the dropping like flies comment was way too much.
|
Really? It was in jest, obviously people aren't going to be dropping dead from Radon exposure.
__________________
Long time caller, first time listener
|
|
|
11-22-2015, 01:41 PM
|
#19
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
If you don't let the radon build up though, how else will you develop super powers?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daradon For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-22-2015, 08:12 PM
|
#20
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lchoy
My wife would be very pleased to see this thread on CP. She's the program coordinator for radon awareness for Ontario
It doesn't get a lot of attention as tobacco is what people usually associate with lung cancer.
The danger with it is long term exposure. Because it's a gas that arises from rock, the concern if you spend a lot of time in an area the gas can collect and concentrate, such as a basement or basement suite. You can get a kit from home Depot and test areas where you spend time regularly. Leave it there for 3 months, and send it off to the lab for results.
If you do have high levels in the home, it can be rectified by installing a fan pipe in the basement to vent the gas outside.
She had a lot of fun working with Mike Holmes on the PSA, and hopes it reaches a lot of Canadians.
I can relay any questions you might have on radon to her.
LChoy
|
Can she respond to the detailed report in post 6 that concludes there is no proven risk in residential scenarios (2010)?
And this?
http://forensic-applications.com/radon/reviews.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heal...n#Health_risks
Last edited by troutman; 11-22-2015 at 08:21 PM.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 AM.
|
|