Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2018, 05:15 PM   #61
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
I am curious to know why people slot Lindholm as a top 6 forward and Janko as bottom 6. Both were first round draft picks and both scored 17 goals in the their rookie season (I know 4 those goals shouldn’t count because it was in a nothing game but since he did this with limited minutes and no PP time...I am going to count these). I don’t care that Johnny and Monny are the dynamic duo...the team owes it to itself to see if there is any long term chemistry with Janko and Johnny.
Wat
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 05:18 PM   #62
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
I am curious to know why people slot Lindholm as a top 6 forward and Janko as bottom 6. Both were first round draft picks and both scored 17 goals in the their rookie season (I know 4 those goals shouldn’t count because it was in a nothing game but since he did this with limited minutes and no PP time...I am going to count these). I don’t care that Johnny and Monny are the dynamic duo...the team owes it to itself to see if there is any long term chemistry with Janko and Johnny.
Lindholm's rookie season was, like, five years ago dude. He's proven himself as a capable top-six forward in Carolina, and has only built upon that thus far in Calgary.

Jankowski has never been consistently slotted into the top-six, and there's a reason for that -- he's streaky and the opportunity hasn't presented itself for a long-term assignment on the basis of injury.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 05:29 PM   #63
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Wat
Granteed's alternate account
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 05:43 PM   #64
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
I suppose, IF Monahan was ever to miss a game, Elias Lindholm could become #1 centre by default.
Gaudreau - Lindholm - Tkachuk

Will do.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 06:14 PM   #65
JJFlash
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Lindholm's rookie season was, like, five years ago dude. He's proven himself as a capable top-six forward in Carolina, and has only built upon that thus far in Calgary.

Jankowski has never been consistently slotted into the top-six, and there's a reason for that -- he's streaky and the opportunity hasn't presented itself for a long-term assignment on the basis of injury.
Well dude....that really has no bearing on why Janko has been given only 1 game on the top line. I really don’t know if Lindholm played top 6 minutes in his rookie year but I am betting he did and with better linemates than Bennett and Hathaway.

Bennett has been given every opportunity to work his way up the line up...Janko showed that he could rise to the occasion is a small sample size. To me that would warrant another opportunity. He did not play higher than the 3rd line in pre-season while rookie prospects were bumped up the line up.
JJFlash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 06:17 PM   #66
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
Well dude....that really has no bearing on why Janko has been given only 1 game on the top line. I really don’t know if Lindholm played top 6 minutes in his rookie year but I am betting he did and with better linemates than Bennett and Hathaway.
Maybe he will get some time on the top line this season, and while I thought he was a lot better on Saturday night Jankowski has just not been anywhere near good enough this early in the season to warrant an assignment with Monahan and Gaudreau.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 06:19 PM   #67
Hells Bells
First Line Centre
 
Hells Bells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Bennett-Backlund-Neal
Tkachuk-Ryan-Czarnik
Dube-Jankowski-Frolik

Each line has a mix of size, skill, speed and defensive awareness.

Backlund with Bennett/Neal looked good last game. Tkachuk and Ryan have both shown chemistry with Czarnik at times. Jankowski and Dube benefit from Frolik's experience and defensive awareness.
__________________
Hells Bells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 06:29 PM   #68
JJFlash
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Janko by no means is blameless in this odyssey. He needs to play with size and grit. I am just saying that he had 1 game on the top line all last year and he hit it out of the park. Other players like Bennett, Shore, Lazar, and Stewart were given longer auditions with limited results.

In summary, since he scored his 4 goals in the regular season last year he has been stapled to the 3 rd and 4 th line in the pre season and 4th line minutes averaging 8 minutes per game to eventually a healthy scratch. I am just saying the math does not add up.
JJFlash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 07:22 PM   #69
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
Janko by no means is blameless in this odyssey. He needs to play with size and grit. I am just saying that he had 1 game on the top line all last year and he hit it out of the park. Other players like Bennett, Shore, Lazar, and Stewart were given longer auditions with limited results.

In summary, since he scored his 4 goals in the regular season last year he has been stapled to the 3 rd and 4 th line in the pre season and 4th line minutes averaging 8 minutes per game to eventually a healthy scratch. I am just saying the math does not add up.
Of course it does. Context is especially key here. Yes, Jankowski had a four-goal game, and I believe he still has untapped offensive potential. But that game was a glorified exhibition tilt against a team that had punched their ticket to the playoffs and were trying their damndest to avoid breaking a nail. good for Jankowski, but his preseason and the first two games were not great—and NOT because of the quality of his line mates. Look at what Bennett has done: he has willed himself off of the fourth line and was easily the most important player in the Colorado win. Jankowski needs to do what Bennett was doing in the Nashville and the St Louis game to get a promotion.

I also think Peters's treatment of Jankowski has to do with higher expectations he has for him as a player in the long run. It's a long season and there will be a lot of movement up and down the lineup with injuries and week-by-week performances. I trust that if Jankowski continues to improve on his game on Saturday—which I thought was really good—he will get opportunities, but I do not think it is a great idea just to hand them to him.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 07:35 PM   #70
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

If both Monahan and Backlund miss a game, what an opportunity that will be for either Czarnik, Jankowski, Bennett or Dube to fill in on one of those lines.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 08:19 PM   #71
Ryan Coke
#1 Goaltender
 
Ryan Coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
This term is being thrown around way too loosely lately, just because they have a differing opinion than the majority they are being personally attacked.
This is a major gear grinder lately on here.

People throw troll around all the time, and it almost always is in the context of a small mind that doesn’t like someone disagreeing with them.

It’s like all my left over anti Gulutzan rage is now directed at the complete over use of calling people trolls.

Apologies for going off topic.

Last edited by Ryan Coke; 10-15-2018 at 08:29 PM.
Ryan Coke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryan Coke For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2018, 08:22 PM   #72
EVERLAST
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: https://homestars.com/companies/2808346-keith-my-furnace-guy
Exp:
Default

This is why it's great to finally have depth and a coach willing to let our younger players play and earn something.
Jankowski will learn pretty quick its all up to him if he wants in the lineup to stay.
EVERLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 08:25 PM   #73
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJFlash View Post
Well dude....that really has no bearing on why Janko has been given only 1 game on the top line. I really don’t know if Lindholm played top 6 minutes in his rookie year but I am betting he did and with better linemates than Bennett and Hathaway.

Bennett has been given every opportunity to work his way up the line up...Janko showed that he could rise to the occasion is a small sample size. To me that would warrant another opportunity. He did not play higher than the 3rd line in pre-season while rookie prospects were bumped up the line up.
I’m confused......are you actually asking why a player who has proven to be top 6 forward is considered a top 6 forward by fans on this board, and why a player who is still proving he’s an NHL regular isn’t being considered a top 6 forward by fans on this board yet?
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2018, 08:05 AM   #74
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Sounds like some type hand injury for Backlund...Boomer reporting that he’s using his left hand to shake peoples hands at the special olympics event today
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:24 AM   #75
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Bennett-Backlund-Neal
Tkachuk-Ryan-Czarnik
Dube-Jankowski-Frolik

Each line has a mix of size, skill, speed and defensive awareness.

Backlund with Bennett/Neal looked good last game. Tkachuk and Ryan have both shown chemistry with Czarnik at times. Jankowski and Dube benefit from Frolik's experience and defensive awareness.
Don't like Tkachuk with Ryan and Czarnik.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:39 AM   #76
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Lindholm's rookie season was, like, five years ago dude. He's proven himself as a capable top-six forward in Carolina, and has only built upon that thus far in Calgary.

Jankowski has never been consistently slotted into the top-six, and there's a reason for that -- he's streaky and the opportunity hasn't presented itself for a long-term assignment on the basis of injury.
Love your new avatar! A Tkachuk getting a new “mean module” installed.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick M. For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021